COMMENTS ON MR. ROBERT MAYO'S LETTER TO MR. HELMS DATED 22 MARCH 1969 (Sanitized)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP72R00410R000100140009-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 21, 2004
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 27, 1969
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP72R00410R000100140009-4.pdf73.26 KB
Body: 
TOP SECRET Approved For Release 2004112/15: CIA-RDP72R00410R00010014000 7 ~J ' 14 00023355D opy 2 7 MAR 1969 25X1 25X1 MEMORANDUM FOR : Executive Assistant to the Deputy Director SUBJECT Comments on Mr. Robert Mayo's Letter to Mr. Helms dated 22 March 1969, 1. Mr. Mayo's letter of 22 March to the Director restates the Bureau of the Budget's opposition to I F intelligence needs for the system. As other offices are more competent to comment on these issues, this memorandum will be confined to addressing several program related matters raised by Mr. Mayo. The cost data quoted in the attachment to Mr. Mayo's letter appears to be badly out of line. However, the NRO Comptroller-is in the best position to comment on this issue. The basic thrust of the letter and its attachment is aimed at 3. Attached to Mr. Mayo's letter is a graphical display entitled "ImpL )ved Photographic Resolutior.". For search satellites this display is inaccurate in several regards. First, in 1967 with the introduction of the J-3 version of the CORONA system, the NRO review(s) completed. Release 20011Op5 R00410R0001 25 25 25 Approved For Releass N IS .R 9I-DP72R00410R000100140009-4. SUBJECT: Comments on Mr. Robert Mayo's Letter to Mr. Helms dated 22 March 1969, F77 -7 search resolution improved from something like ten feet to seven feet, not six feet as intended. There will be no further important changes in the CORONA system performance. Therefore,' the dotted extension to the curve is misleading. 5. There is also a statement in Mr. Mayo's letter which implies that the three inch framing camera now being flown with CORONA is entirely adequate. Assuming that the Department of Defense requirements for 1:50, 000 scale maps is.valid, Mr. Mayo's conclusions about the capabilities of the three inch framing camera are incorrect.. There is no way that adequate imagery can be collected to meet this DOD requirement without developing and flying a new framing camera system. S16RED JOHN J. CROWLEY Director of Special Projects DD /S & T I I Page Two Approved For ReIeasT 4/ ECKATRDP72R004 25 25 25 25 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/12/15 : CIA-RDP72R0041OR000100140009-4 Approved For Release 2004/12/15 : CIA-RDP72R0041OR000100140009-4