CONGRESS CHECK ON C.I.A. BACKED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP74-00297R000401370014-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 7, 2013
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 25, 1956
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP74-00297R000401370014-5.pdf85.34 KB
Body: 
fury r lrleVrt tf7" RS,' giCR 9S 'KM STAT 41J Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/05/07: CIA-RDP74-00297R000401370014-5 tONGRESS CHECK ON C.I.A. BACKED .Senate Rules Unit Gives Strong Support to Bill? 'Hits Excessive Secrecy By ALLEN DRURY? Special to The New York Times. WASHINGTON, Feb. 24?The Senate Rules Committee gave powerful endorsement today to the creation of a special "watch- dog" committee of Congress to supervise the activities of the Central Intelligence Agency. The C. I. A. is theiGovern- ment's super-secret agency for gathering information abroad concerning the strength and in- tentions of other nations, In ? a report 'heavy with criti- cism of C. I. A.'s pres/tnt opera- tions, the Rules Committee ap- proved for Senate consideration a bill by Senator Mike Mansfield, Democrat of Montana, to create a special committee. This group would supervise C. I. A. in the same way Congress supervises the Atomic Energy Commission. The committee would receive $250,000 for its first year. The bill is opposed by Presi- dent Eisenhower and by Allen W. Dulles, director of the C. I. A. The President recently created an eight-man citizen's advisory beard to study C. I. A.'s activi- ties and report directly to him concerning them. Sees too Much Secrecy that secrecy "now beclouds everything about C. I. A.; its cost, its personnel, its efficiency, its failures. An aura of superior- ity has been built -around it. It is freed from practically every ordinary form of Congressional review. "The C. I. A. has unquestion- ably placed itself above other Government agencies. There has been no regular methodical re- view of this ,agency, other than a briefing which is supplied to a few members of selected sub- committees." An equally tart minority re- port was given by the second- ranking member of the Rules Committee, Senator Carl Hay- den, Democrat of Arizona. He argued that through these sub- committees?of the House and Senate Armed Services and Ap- propriations Committees?Con- gress continues to maintain "su- pervision over the operations of that agency to an entirely ade- quate degree." Senator Hayden said that the charge that Congress did. not sufficiently control C. I. A. .ri,-_as a "mistaken and erroneous as- sumption." The Senate Armed Services subcommittee on C. I. A. heard Mr. Dulles in closed session this morning. As usual, it refused to make public what Mr. Dulles said. ' Hoover Inquiries Cited The Rules Committee majority pointed out that over the last six years the C. I. A. had been investigated four times by dif- rent task forces of the Hoover Commission. ? "The substance of the findings over the spread of these years," The Rules Committee based its r chief argument for the Mansfield' bill on the secrecy that sur-i rounds the C. I. A-. It recognized' _ the need for much secrecy in gathering intelligence but said there was "a profound differ-I ence between an essential degree; of secrecy to achieve a specific! purpose, and secrecy for the , mere sake of secrecy." The committee pointed outi it said, "were, generally tIN same ? that inadequacies and poor organization existed .ani had gone uncorrected." The committee, praised the President for appointing his own eight-man Citizens' 'Board on Intelligence. But it offered these objections: ? board will' report . its Endings directly to the Presi- 'dent. ? No provision is made to require the board to maintain Congressional liaison. ? * ? " 2. "The board functions essen- tially on a schedule of semi- annual meetings and operates on a per diem and travel al- lowance. There is no provision for a continuous staff ? ?? ? capable of conducting compre- hensive surveys. The board is a part-time survey." 3. "The board will report its in- formation, good or bad, to the President, thus strengthening the already tight control 'ol the Executive over C. I. A." The committee noted that Mr,. Dulles had opposed a Joint Con- gressional ? committee for fear that gifficient security would not be maintained. It cited the Joint Atomic Energy Committee as proof that this ? fear was groundless. ? " ? _ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/05/07: CIA-RDP74-00297R000401370014-5