STUDY OF OPTIONS FOR CONTINUING OPERATION OF THE OXCART AIRCRAFT IN FISCAL YEAR 1969

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP74B00283R000100090001-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 26, 2005
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 7, 1960
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP74B00283R000100090001-4.pdf410.76 KB
Body: 
'~ Ir Clio v..V.LL~ S~;L!f~!fi(i~/,+,^ 11 `,i r?., ' NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE ? OFFICE a ,,, ,25X1 r Xti,;A A G I IT :'NORANDU.2 FOR THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE of the OXCART Aircraft in Fiscal Year 1969 SU13JECT: Study of Options for Continuing Operation aircraft beyond the currently programmed phaseout date of June 30, 1968 has been completed. Althougha number of alternatives have been studied, I believe the following, options are significant'for your consideration: bility and cost of continuing operation of the OXCART In accordance with your request, a study of the feasi- Option 1. The OXCART aircraft would,be transferred, .to the Strategic Air Command (SAC) by October 31, 1968. ? ..SAC-operation of seven of these aircraft (six operation- ally configured plus one trainer) at current rates would ? begin by about January 1, 1969, with substitution of-?. ;.;.Air Force for contractor'support wherever possible. .The eighth (test) aircraft would be sent-to Palmdale for continuing contractor test operation. Option 2. The OXCART aircraft would be transferred to SAC as in Option 1 and the SAC SR-71 inventory would' be reduced by eight SR-71's to be stored at-Palmdale,.., starting September 1, 1968. Flying at current OXCART rates would begin by November 1,'1968._ Option 3. The OXCART aircraft would be retained under CIA operational control and management'. ? ..25X1 prog m set .. ...... would be transferred from F 7to Beale Air Force 25h base by October 31, 1968. u Us 2tution of some Air Force maintenance and other support for,. contractor support is assumed.'.- Present OXCART flying rates ~?, would be resumed.by January.l, 1969. .r, .,.USAF review(s) completed. NRO review(s) completed. 25X1 I rT- q Q _ COMt.oI MO V. v... r to-v. ' r Sara .-Ur\.Lj l.;Yl L' t.cWO[o room .VtOM.TIC MC...o1M. Approved For. Released006f06J4G.1+OW-REW74B60283R000100f~5bU'01= " March 7, 1969 ,;~:;. Approved F lease 20 Q i/ :v' ` tDP74B002 000190090001 4, Option 4. Current OXCART operations would be ' c d i ont nue , at This is a bac:n line option against which the costs o'other options may be measured. . 1.nk pi.ementac 1.on ox any of these options. One factor affecting ...,..be worked out on the basis of more complete planning for ..operating arrangements and contractor support would need to. These costs were necessarily estimates, since details of aid 1969 on the basis of the best culrontly available data. ` The costs of the options studied were derived for F? 1963 estimat'on, it was assumed that the demountable units at trailers and headquarters building. For purposes of cost otc&4"- ft .LA. ru.Ce ease, 1nCiucing aircraft shelters, hangars,- could be moved to Beale Air Force Base and costs were included for site preparation, foundations and utilities;. or additional military personnel at Beale would also pose a b required to accommodate these buildings.' On-base. housing pro lem in the long run, but this could not be resolved Phaseover options. Housing trailers from could help 25X1 ,:The costs .of the,options.are as follows: Option 1 Option 2 Option 3' option 4 FY 1969 These costs include consideration of N ? costs for operation .:USAF25X1of the OXCART by the CIA, costs for operation'of USAF 25X1the OXCART (as appropriate in each option), CIA andi direct support costs for each option, costs of closeout o- .25x1; _ for Options i, 2 and.3 and costs of construction ~ '.1'~ 1~ '? COPY Approved For Relea~seo Idd#.fiDP'~4B0028'3R000a11Qj ebb WHOM 11011,19 9bb1 "at W11 Additional Total (including Beale Air Force closeout of event in FY 1969 u 00'010005OA~~x41? for additional military housing) at e for Options1 and 3. The cost for will be incurred as an NRP cost in any der the current plan for phaseout of after June 30, 1968. The OXCART associated (SAC operation of the OXCART offset by ? the OXCART prog costs in Optio: J ?'' ~ rcrnoyal c f ni r4 SR_7l l $ f'rnni t`he' i, ventr.., y) hav L _ _ _- __ ,. - _ , Table I. It should be noted that the FY 1969 costs for ' '? closing F ____]and for new construction at Beale Air Force Base are on me.l costs; however, costs for ..ears corresponding to a full year of operation without one-time costs included; an estimate for FY 1970 costs i c include e a Cached 1aDle 11. In summary, the FY 1970 costs y: . subsequent to Y Y 1969 cannot be derived by subtracting these one-time costs from the totals; since Options 1, 2 degrees during` the, period June 30. 1968 to^.7anua --~, l , 969 ::;i?;.;ti:, In order to provide comparative costs for these options The Air Force has reviewed the feasibility of options. calling for operation of the OXCART aircraft by SAC, from the standpoint of training, maintenance, facilities at concluded that the options and schedules described above are feasible. However, there are substantial; differences the areas of cockpit, instruments, sensors, engines ^and~ airframe. If commonality in subsystems were to be sought between the two aircraft, considerable expenditure of time and money would be required for modification. Therefore, the options considered contemplate only the operation of the OXCART aircraft in their present configurations. This'. would *require formation of specialized units within SAC 4-,'capable of maintaining and operating the OXCART aircraft 25X1 co.T.oL.o +~ Approved far Re r oT x'61 ,'r~ fc RDP74BQa2$3R0.0G9QQQe;Q,(61-4 ,r,.,., Approved `Fdr lease ~ ti614:HW~ IA-RDP74B0i@ 000100090004- 25X1 c,s is- Conversion of as much of the maintenance from uA.u vy required until the SAC unit were manned and trained contractor to military personnel will require substantial improvements in the techni[!.11 ri^t-n ~~rnti l ~1~1 .F..,. r1. . nvnAnM ,.. utilized for the SR-71. These factors were taken into ?? r account :.n estimating option costs. Continuation of the OXCART program into FY 1969 under any ok the options discussed herein will not only require'- .additional procurement of spares, AGE and other equipment:.'. Z,.. I ..? since up to I lof such items common to the SR-71 and ;'.;..; .. OXCART programs have not been procured for the SR-71 in FY 1968, on the. assumption that OXCART assets would become available in FY 1969. However, adoption of any of the options for the continued operation of the OXCART will c ..,..for adjustments of the allocation of assets and fund re- .~` imbursement between the OXCART and SR-71 programs.. Our ::..;, current assessment indicates that if such transfers of ;'assets and outstanding reimbursement liabilities between 25X11 Security would, require special attention under all of ~:".'' . the options calling for transfer of the OXCART aircraft to %Beale Air Force Base. The most difficult problems would arise in connection with Option 3, in which the CIA would present cost estimates, in the interest of maintaining security separation, between the OXCART and the SR-71 programs at.' Beale'Air Force Base. Options 1 to 3, however, all call for develop-men-6'6f a plausible explanation for the surfacing.. of- these additional. aircraft, differing..in configuration implemented, might require additional buildings and other facilities at Beale Air Force Base, not included in the phis option has not been reviewed with the CIA, and if ~?? continue to operate the aircraft at Beale Air Force Base. ? 'm u Approved-For Reie'age'2t)06f08At8;,-6IA-RDP74B00'283R'd ?programs are made, the net costs for FY 1968 and FY 1969 for 'any of the a Lions may be reduced by between ??~ 25X1 Approved Fb lease 20( 614 / uD ~DP74B002 00100090001-4 14 ? s problems have not been addressed in the current St'udv ?hiit- vU?x,11 o Options ~. tnrougn 3 were contemplated would require detailed attention if i-mplementation - of a?nv COMTRO\ HOJ Approved. For Rele o ~ ot~~~?F P7413002$3R000? a4______..... NRO 25X1 NRO %:;. :.? . Approved For Release 2006/03/15 : CIA-RDP74B00283R000100090001-4 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2006/03/15 : CIA-RDP74B00283R000100090001-4