RUSSIANS MAKE MISSILE ADVANCES, UNVEIL NEW GENERATION OF ARMS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000100090041-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 5, 1999
Sequence Number: 
41
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 23, 1965
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000100090041-3.pdf105.34 KB
Body: 
FOIAb3b Sanitized - Approved Fpr. Release : or,L ~ ~lIrr~ CFPYRGHT M. 2.16,367 a 356,753 MAY 2 3 1965 Russian s Make Missile, Advances, Generation Of Arms ',,Unveil New By WILL IAM E. HOWARD Washingldn Bureau, The Oregonian WAS14INGTON Russia appears to be well on the ray to erasing whatever cad, the United States holds in long-range missiles. . hi' the past few months, and more recently on May ; they'haveunveiled an en- ire new "generation" of our solid-fueled ICBMs that compare with this country's Minuteman and submarine - launched Polaris missiles. Moreover, they have come up with a new solid - fueled iobile medium-range (about 1,200, miles) missile something the U.S.? can't etch. This weapon, nick- named the "Iron Maiden," is' a considerable advance over the cumbersome liquid fueled Sandal missiles that were deployed in Cuba. Unit Mobile The "Iron Maiden"'is car- ried on a tracked transport- er that also acts as a launcher. It is entirely mo- bile. 'The Sandals needed large bases, on. the other hand, and it. was through the: scraping of dirt for launch sites that the Soviet- Cuba operation was spotted in time to halt it. No such `telltale evidence will be available to snooping reconnaissance p l a n e s should the Russians decide t ship the new missile to Cuba. This is. but one of several worries now surfacing in the wake of what seems to be a major transition in the shape of the Soviet strategic striking force. It. could well force. some. major changes n U.S: armaments and, if it Today, five years later, e asn't already, initiate a is head of the C ntral In- ew "escalation" in the telligence Ag~ Cy.ttl'; rms race. Ruhsirans_[1re parading two It is the contention of solid - fuled missiles which ; most informed observers. they say are designed to be ere that the Soviets never eyed submarines. i - k s et or m arade a new roc Reborn is in an interesting -has ile until long after it position to check on the sc- one into service, possibly c of his forecast . urac is much as two or three .Y ears This would allow The Soviet switch to land- lenty of time for a substan- based solid fueled' ICBMs, ial buildup. about to be launched from But there is a large area an underground silo that' f doubt here. Neither Rus- also-protects them, presents;. ian nor U,S. intelligence is a new complication for the"; e mis-J nd deployment figures. The "missile gap" of the 960 election campaign was based upon prior estimates of the number of big liquid ueled ICBMs the Russians ould produce. -Once the e n n e d y administration' took office, however, the in- telligence estimates were tion whether enough Minute revised. Defense Secretary man and Polaris missiles Robert S. McNamara let it are being built. The planned be known that the, Soviets total is 1,000 Minutemen and had not built very many 656 Polat?is, the latter.'; ICBMs and, very shortly, it' aboard 41 submarines. was claimed that the "mis- . Last year, McNamara, kill sile gap" was in favor of the ed a plan to add 20 more TT Q At the time, there was that the Russians conjecture , had dropped the hard - to. -. Minutemen to the force. He said they weren't 'needed in view of current development of the more deadly Minute- man II favor of easy-to-launch sol- Just two weeks ago, how- id fueled missiles. It ' now ever, the secretary had a appears this is precisely change.of mind about what what happened. . was needed to fight the war In this connection, it is in Viet Nam. The admini'stra- perhaps timely to recall that.. tion is now asking another back in 1960? Adm. William $700 million. for planes and F. Raborn contended on sev- ammunition, eral occasions the Polaris missile was about five years It. will`be interesting to see ahead of Russia; Reborn if the new evidence of Soviet was then boss of the Polaris ICBM muscleorces another program change ?:in thinking.' war names. ? os siles will be much harder to ;i knock out in the event of an' all-out- conflict. It will take,. more U.S. missiles'to do the job. Need Cited CPYRGHT. Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00001 R000100090041-3