JURY ACQUITS 2 IN B26 CASE, IGNORES CHARGES AGAINST CIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000200120015-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 22, 1999
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 14, 1966
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000200120015-7.pdf134.77 KB
Body: 
OCT fA 1966 ApproL'VFq r e'Iease' 1999/09/07: C'IA-RDP7 CPYF~GHT By ORR KELLY Star Staff Writer , 71-27-Two men accused of illegally exporting seven B26 bombers to Portugal were found not guilty on all counts by a federal court jury here last might. The foreman of the jury of 10 men and two women said a de? fense contention that the en- tire operation, had been con- ducted for the Central Intelli- gence Agency didn't enter seri- ously into -their deliberations, which went on for a little more than five hours. Squeals of delight came from the section in the courtroom ;where friends and relatives of John Richard Hawke, the ad- mitted pilot of the seven planes, :and Count Henri Marin de Mont- marin, the alleged go-between 'in the deal, had waited for the verdict. - Immediately afterward De Montmarin, who wears the Legion of Honor for his services i as a fighter pilot with the Free French forces during World War ,II, slipped'off into an anteroom' and placed a call to his wife :and three grown children in Paris, to tell them that he had been freed. Edward Brodsky of New York; who represented De Montmarin, and Edwin Marger of Miami Beach, Hawke's attorney., had' presented distinctively different defenses. Brodsky contended that his client had no reason to be cofi- ' corned about the export licenses which are required when arms are shipped out of the country. Marger attempted, on the other hand, to show that Hawke, a bearded ex-Royal Air Force; pilot,' thought he was working'; for the CIA when he flew the' seven planes across the Atlan tid In the summer-of I965. ApprovedFo'r Release 8 S prize witness was Lawrence R. Houston, general counsel of the CIA, who, in an unprecedented court ap- earance, testified that his gency's sole role in the opera- ion was to learn about it from ndisclosed sources and to pass he information on to other gov- rnrnent agencies.. Wallace Fox, foreman of the ury, said after. the verdict that he jury had been disappointed hat H t ' t ous on s estimony had een 'sharply limited by Federal istrict Judge John 0 Hender- . on, but that the jurors had and the two defendants not uilty on the basis of other con- iderations, quite apart from larger's theory that the CIA ad masterminded the entire oration.'. , Another of 'the defendants, in fighter pilot who allegedly ar- ranged for the planes to be smuggled out of -the country-! has not as yet. been appre-, hended. Board left the United States. two days before Hawke and 'de Montmarin were arrested and.' the government contends it has not, despite continuing efforts, been able to lay its hands on him since. U.S. Atty. 'John T. Curtin, the' prosecutor, and the two defense- attorneys put much of the blame. for the entire affair'on Board,'' in their summation to the jury yc.,_crday. The government had promised" in the United Nations that the, defendants would be vigorously; prosecuted, for violation of a1. prohibition ? against providing; arms to Portugal for use' in-its' African posse sions of A l ' i ngo a s yeas-old for;ber Australian and Mozambique. , t 1999/09107'.: CIA-RDP75-00001 R000200120.0'15-7.