THE CIA'S SECRET VIETNAM STUDY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000200180045-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 6, 2000
Sequence Number: 
45
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 23, 1964
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000200180045-8.pdf93.05 KB
Body: 
SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE Approved For Release 2001/0$p(@t1TQPe3P - p0001R000 CPYRGHT Matthias observed in a s, views on negotiating a settle- An o;iicial of the Central Intelligence gcuey cc..'et. and that it was of a has suggested the possibility of "some Lied 'of tisc:ursive nature. negotiated settlement" of the hostilities in South VV.ien it was made availa- Vietnam. e to the press it had a cov- According to the proposal, which was made r sheet signed by Sherman public but not endorsed by Administration Kent, chairman of,the Board. . ..... , sources, the negotiated settlement would be based of National Estimates, stat- ing their offensive more vig- upon neutralization of the area. ing that the paper had "gen- orously than ever. Willard Matthias, a member of the CIA's oral board approval, though "The political mistakes of Board of National Estimates, one of the highest no attempt has been made to the Diem regime ..inhibited units, in the ageney, was author of the su gestioi reach general agreement on the effective prosecution of in a 50-page working paper dated Junc S. every point of it." the war, which -. is really did not reflect Official Unit c States policy. It was ma ? A colleague of Matthias de- I available apparently only scribed the paper as a "think cause a copy was said pie c e," typical of many have been obtained by 1.1 which are d i s t rib u t e d Chicago Tribune, which i' throughout the various agen- dicated it . planned to, pr ; cies of government. excerpts. Q u a l i f i e d sources said, 'STALEMATE' however, that while Matthias' paper that there was "s: r -. ment did not reflect the mu- ous doubt that victory can 1 e vial U. S. position, they were won" and indicated that, t widely held in government best, "a prolonged st 1. - and were the subject of re- mate" might be achieved; current official discussions. more of a political contest than a military, operation, and led to the regime's de- struction. it was felt that the views a single official sug :esting'~ . a possible negotiation.' alight be incorrectly consti'aecl as the Administration's. policy. Administration souiv.;es said. it was then decided -to make the paper public to demon trite both that it was not a" Working papers of offi.c A s In his paper e n t i t l e d of the Central Intellit. a 1 e ':Trends in the World Situ- Agency are almost n x ation," Matthias wrote: made public. It was bellte , however, that when Ada i 1 _ - "The g u e r r i l l a war in istration leaders learned 111 't; South Vietnam is in its fifth a copy had fallen into Me year, and no end appears in hands of a newspaper }',sight. The Vit, Cong in the feared some political: i 't` South, dependent largely .might be- made of it. upon their own resources but under the direction ancVcon- trol' of the Communist re- gime in-thu North, are press- "The counter-guerrilla ef- fort continues to flounder, partly because of the inher- ent difficulty of the problem and partly. because Diem's successors have not:.yet dem- onstrated the leadership and inspiration necessary.: "There remains ' serious doubt that victory.: can be won, and the situation re- mains very fragile.. If large- scale U.S: support -continues and if further political dete- rioration within South Vict- n.zm is. prevented, at least a prolonged stalemate` -can be FOIAb3b "There is also a chance that political evolution within the country and develop- ments upon the world seen could lead to some kind 0 negotiated settlement base upon neutralization " AppromedlEor_P,e!ease-20Q1./Q8/Q1_:CW-RDP7.5-00001R00020oa80045-8