THE ECONOMIC FRONT LECTURE TO THE NATIONAL STRATEGY SEMINAR FOR RESERVE OFFICERS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
21
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 22, 1999
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 17, 1959
Content Type: 
SPEECH
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1.pdf1.48 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIMIRDS75---0-01261R40200550005-1 TEE ECONOMIC MONT ORAL STRATEGY SEMINAR TOR MERU OFFICERS The National War College Washington, D.C. 41351aM ST4 Cont!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"4 25X1A9a reciate the opportunity to speak to this distinguis udience and to participate in the *Atonal Strategy Seminar for Reserve Officers. general Arastrong has quite appropriately asked ms to talk about the economic front. The Soviet challenge, as you all know, le more than economic -- it is military, subversive and political S s well. Ity remarks will of necessity touch on all these fields. I hope thereby to gain In perapective more than is lost by departing from e movie purity -- if it in not 4 contradiction in terms to put the word "economic" next to the word ?purity.* trat of all, the regimes in *scow and Peiping are governed by the principles of international Communism. Their single purpose is the liquidation of our form of free society and the emergence of a Sovietised communized =rid order. The aims of international Communism, with its headquarters in Moscow, are vorld-vide in score; its Objectives axe unlimited. Soviet leaders firmly believe and eloquently preach, that Communism is the system which mill eventually rule the world. Each move they make is directed to this end. It follows togically that the economic development of the ! which is the vanguard of world Communism, is Shaped to serve the a of international Communism, not of the Soviet people, Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 To diversion of oecnonic tbe Soviet Union is uitbout in L1atO17 uf the wad. I define notional s*a to include defense' research and devologinant foreign Invsetnent in industry. ot ir objectives Oily bays detorianed cost titheit forsidable nilitary ostabliebnent and a strong ichwin provide a secure bone Woe n1111i? to foreign activities. te fact by oneadning bee totol outputs ins elloostod in the trkV last year, vn vision of the productina Plo? itiatisa AU 3.) of the &sods and services larger torriart population* tin dispsrity in living t snows Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 wenta The or ro oar shopping treaters, Td building props* tiara fer the military ;rat in absolute dollarti ow national products theY ors to military pxrpores ae se ems 40, 41K 4111, Olt fort Further, am moar typos to largo stocks of obsolomont or me nest motel. eon ba need by the Commesist loaders to *tames Conesdats Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 et isle Tho September 33 sri tt pt *involute to sinks roma, affeoutlitsit sad as tabs meld my hams, these have been pnfttabZa Or.Possession of modern areamente also is ge by the leaders of the ace Africee Communist same have pams to Citilmoa es by a militaxymissios. There taloa nationals in Wilma, Thus, ger too first time* ?f Cot tionisdevalopiug, in the will tome/am fronwilitsry Ow se* outlays are so high in the of emesomio growth In the short space of 30 par*, ths awrist 4high hata Pawn from & relatively beeboard motion to become the second largeot Issinstriulisod usioomy is the world. It is true that the ismaang pose ef induetriallsation hes slowed moderately innocent years. liewever# its growth is still sell over twice that which we aehUreed during ths *weds of the 19$0,6 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 on his e rent military strength. lie is convinced that the final victarf ccemanien ecn be edlienced wanly b.: tion-ialitia7 MIMI* thresisehger explained soviet piennse develspiont tor tne resit wrest years in those verdeb to ausrarise tce ten booze of his opening end sliming remarks at the 21st Piuti Congresor The ernmonic eight of the Soviet Union ie hosed on part of beim indestry. This still Inver* the Soviets victor7 in pearmfol estosostie emipet.ition elth oefitalist countries. arrolopment of swit soonomic eight mill give Ccemenisa the decisive edge in the international balance of povr it iii sttrahorss ta Atla in on way to progrens In toe $!r*.s lees of of the sect. es, p.respit* income are half those s the rasa Int Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 4 to establieh quidral f rapid eceneate appeal. The lmsd*rs at world Connuatima ars alert to the opportimmi4, transformation afforde then. In their radio creed. musts to Af the Middle Last and Asia, and %breath t&ir local front genisations, the Soviets ple4eet the image of the &ovt spasm se tht nagie blueprint for achieving rapid preaess. should not underestimate the attractios vnieh Audi an beige has nen of influence in underdeveloped countries nhe are denperately to lead their people Into Us Twentieth Cantu*. I* so sem moo one piece of Seelet prepaondb nhica in India last year. (Briefing Aid 2) in the Soviet Unless ceeparee 177S1.1. and in the rated States in a highlp green fiw tines &IF fast as that in t IA beth Zovis But in *As of metros* ek recession of 1958. the Soviet output ems still ouch deprmiummitmeasse of the ver'is destruction it 2vsla relay the line l*Prios.ritingt g?-S.1 you SOO 'Wit as this cMrt Um* the first quarter &aline in 1958 vlOod Out 454. product.ton increees in recent sears. Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Tou see Uncle 8i - pot-bellied and dark-spectacled, bending backwardly; to vlev the exalted level of Soviet prodictioi. As an added bit of Socialist realism, Uncle Sam's leg is conveniently placed to hide our best years of growth. - IN, VON d a its beiieye tbst the underdeveloped countries es heel of the WeEtern World. These countries similar to that of the proletariat in early inleaders, the free World underdeveloped z thegreatest opportUnities for an extension of Corn- the *duty 0/the USSR as the valward of the o invest some of its resources in promoting this ?xtensioz. The tactical shift in Soviet foreign policy to aid the newly emerging bourgeois governments was unveiled to the vorld in 19$4. The party line turmed from the "armed struggle" phase of the late talin e2s,t,This!4ce "peaceful coexistence." Since then, pesefui. coexistence has become more than a tact cal maneuver; ineed, it is the battle itself. What is "peaceful coexistence? voidsXn the of former Soviet foreign mi*ster She ilov, and Rere I quote *P.sc.tui coexi5teuce does not mean a quiet life. long as different social and political wartime exist, contradictions between them are inevitable. Peaceful co- existence lea struggle -- a political struggle: an economic struggle an ideologioal struggle." Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 When the Communist economic of nsive started, many Western observer3 belittled Soviet capabilities to provide aid to under developed nations. These observers believed that internal Soviet requirements for machinery and equipment, generated by the program of forced draft industrialization, would leave no surplui for export. The judgment overlooked the fact that the Soviet Union had become a major industrial power in the world. Br 1955, its annual production of industrial goods we already running over V billion dollars a year. Furtiler, industrial at an annual rate of nearly. 10 percent. It clearly follows that the 3ov1ets possessed the industrial muecle to step up Communist activities in the Free World by economic means) all that vas needed was the political decision to do eo. A diversion of lecs than one percent of annual oatput W44 enough to support an aid program of significant proportione. The aid program is not a large one by United States standards, Total credit extensions by the USSR over the past four years have only amounted to 1.8 billion dollars, and the net annual drain that is the difference between drawings anci repayments, has never amounted to more than half a billion dollars. The main point is that of all 5oviet outlays for na purpose defense, domestic investment, etc. .- foreign aid impo?s far and away the smalls drain on resources. It could be increased substantially if the Communist leadership saw politically profitable opportunities to do so. Approved For Release 1999/09/08.; 61A-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 put was increasing Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 By 1965, the Soviets could have a forign aid program Wal to ours with still no obacrable stziz on its econcaorip it seems inescapable that the economic compettion will grow. This is part of what Kbruohchev meant when be told Walter Lippman, rFeonomically speaking, We Will cause you Americans more trouble every year.* Up to this point in time soviet Bloc &d to fal, under.. developed countries of the Free World has been dwarfed by 'Western aid. However, it is important to keep in mind that Communiet economic aaflatance is heavily concentrated in a few key target countries. In these countries, the Soviet program is eitt*r arger than the *id provided by the United States, or is sizeable enough to be of considerable importances Here are some examples, (Briefing Aid 3) The bars in this chart compare U.L aid and Bloc tid tram 954 to the first quarter of 1959 Xor ie1ected can see that in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Afghistw. Ceylon and Indonesia, the Bloc has put in far more economic *id than we have. Although not shown in the chart the same is true for Tamen. 3. in Burma India, and Nepal, while Bloc economic aid is less than our own, it ia neverless substantial. This applies to Cambodia as veil. Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 ountries have been willing to expand economic eontact? h the Soviet Bloc for a variety of reasons but a buie tion of the success of the Soviet aid program lies the a the underdeveloped countries are capital-etarved. Many leadere in these countries, in fact, have voiced their suspicions of Soviet intentione, but have defended their acceptance of Bloc assistance on the ground that the great need for additional capital requirements of the underdeveloped countries will become even greater in the future, and unless the Soviets commit serious blundere the Bloc mill continue to find numerous potential eutlete for it assistance offers. So far, however, the Bloc has made acme blunders but has cornmitte Tell yelp. ferwmajor mistakes in its aid program. Its program, in fact has bEen cleverly formulated so as to have a general *Lopes' to all underdeveloped countries. Yeah offer of assistance seem specifically designed to offer a solution to an immediate problem facing the target country. In certain instanceg where the Bloc prornm difera from that or the U.S. the Bloc progrem suffers in comparison. !fever- s there are interrsting contrasts between the Bloc and the U.S. mai &nee programe. First of all, Bloc eoDnomlc aid is peddled on integrated and a continuing basis. A lin of credit is offered simuItaneoulsy Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08: CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 a increased trade e having diffioul e.e1MtaflC, training, and in particular, ties. Now,if an underdeveloped country elling tt products at adequate prices So'et'$ 1ong.teri trade offers have the size of their program is not subject vie, the Sovi.ets are not inhibited r.elnente In contrast, U.S. trade is e aid.progran. We would find it ible to provide a guaranteed cotton or Burmese rice, to cite only two argely outsi politically market for Sr* as SOVtSt Bt?c eid is d has consisted primarily o grnnt. on the Development Loan !Undo however, will y reIie the importance of credits in the U.S. program. arry a two and one-half percent Interest goods to begin the year after the projects has been brought into production. Further repayment prtcea are ub5eet to annual negotiations, which gives 401 or lenient, depending on on a the Soviets an opportunity to W things are go burden is c lo*n averigee 12 ear ? WL wet s our amortisation terms on loans are 20 to 1O year pe oda, so that the annua1 loan previous Western aid had taken Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 ;chi to service further oanstoder would be dubiauL s largely for nduetrtsl devLop" d is intended to appeal to the desire for immediat01,7 in industrialization. It is rarely, for h as under our PL 450 program, t part of total U.s. aid. This remains ea a visible and assistance Fourth, the &atrial development programs are almost always in the public sector of the ec omz, o r. Thia encourages Socialist thinking on economic development as as stimulating government ownership rether e enterprise. aid programs are free of military acts articular e in uncommitted countries. d le a member of a Bloc militia)* alliance. in cor.. own aid goes to countries with *doh the U.S. arramemente. the Communist aid and ide prog 4etned and packaged with the target in mind. It pea1s to neutralist sentiment it prcvides an attractiv aupplement or Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 are there, Policy of economic, pens ion fits like * glove There are over ans in the Free World, helping to train military ? no obvious de com3atgi of.subvers nd to build various indu?trial plants the 3arg8et cshieh initians do engage in prop- . Together with the Oamrmnizt hese tecirnioians do serve to establish * peat oviet presence; to lend credence to Soviet statements of dia. ted help in sthie the Commun economic progress, propeganda goes out through the front reoted overtly or covertly from Moscow. One of gtona in India is the Indo-Zoviet Cultural Society. alook at it. diibted by such 4) tbis Indo*Soviet Cult ociety of its br es are located in MadhYR Pr4desh steel mill is being comPleted propagani, siqdlar to the slide I showed ?S? and USSR industrial growth, is organisations, Ii tok, Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Wt you have seen on this ?Ude is only ne Coiawi1st front zation.? But the Soviets and their Chinese Communist allies ganlzed a vast number of fronts, covering almost every branch enterprise. They include youth and student groups, labor &no organisations, women's groups, and, of course, the World Peace Council with its inznsicrable peace societies. In total, the olailmodsmnbership of all fronts runs into several hundred million people. In addition to the front organizations, and native Communist pszttea, as devices to spread the arguments for Communiert, massive sap programa are beamed daily to Africa, Asia and the Middle East. These arelmotritin scores of languages. They cage from clandestine transmitters as wall as those which are opmayacknowledged. There is no set pattern to these =sears. Moscow carefully tailors broadoasta to fit the particular vulnerabilities of each target area and audience. stress this point because one of the b)ecttves of the Sino t Bloc aid program is to place ita radio broadcasting cqip- nt in areas. Complete radio stations are offered either at cut prices under very liberal credit terms or as a eft. Bloc technicians are always employed in the survey, installotion and initial operating stages at these projects. Mat does Bloc boe to gain by having its transmitters installed in undereveioped countries? Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 nationd by e 8 rally the SOTiet8 have little trouble countries cabinet members or other le Br set facilities stern revolutionary the tic Communism. Charges of brutality by Western colonial powers not only please Moscow but undoubtedly are more permissive to local populatione when broadcast from one of their own countries than when beemed frma MbecoWl At the leaders of the Bloc hope that., Tadio etationa, they will receive the right to broadcaet their own pro am material on these stations. For examples the Chinese Cntmists have presented Cambodia with a gift of a rodio trna- titter. Now the Chinese axe trying to set, the Cambodians to allocate several hours a day for rebroadcasts of Peiping radio programs. would like to Shaw you where the Bloc has built or is of Bring buildto oadcarting facilities in the Free World. (Priefing Aid 5) of i1, there are the two stations in Egypt o come. There are two scheduled for Syria member of the UAR. Perhaps this investment dose fitable to MosooW today as it did a year ago. 2. Eawever, the USSR is now putting up four trans- fers in Iraq, where the Communists are a most powerfe e in and ott of the government. Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 3. Moving from the /4 ddle East to Africa, you can see the otter of a transmitter to Guinea. Rumors suggest that other newly emergent African nations will receive similar offers. h. The bodian station, supplied by China, I have ersa4y mentioned. sa. mo, *No oN? OM am now from the Communist aid program to with the Free World. In wry opinion, thea La a sharp and clear cut I nee in vation between Communist trade with the industrial West and Cctmit trade with the underdeveloped countries of the Free World. st Soviet trade with the Free World is with the industrial Ws The Russians seek to buy chemical equipment, electronics tonation equipment tire plants, and are interested in purchasing facilities to improve their ferrous metallurgical industry. This trade is motivated prarily by internal economic considerations, not by it political impact on the West. Soviet imports of machinerY from Strops, embodying advanced technology, are important to the rapid expansion of Communist industry in certain key areas. This was frankly admitted by Khrushchev when he stated that through such imports; and here I quote, Soviet Union could be given the opportunityof quicker fulfillment of it program without waatint time. ? 16 - Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 of those ma from the Vest in of raw materials, fuels and iednufa ovi*t goods available marketo for Soviet machinery in Germany lee in England. t sales of tin end aluminum at low aeries of "dtng0 from Free World suppliers Rewever such charges overlook the fact that Soviet silos of industrial raw materials to Europe are designed to gain foreign exchange needed to pay for increased imports of ahiz7. The Soviets have always charged as muCh as they thought th. market would bear. When in 1958 Western commodity merkets Acing *recession, Russian prices were low; the recent rise 1 platinum prices, however, misled by Soviet sellers. /n my Qinioflj the Soviets have nothing to gain by disorganising markets and driving prices down in this area -- on the contrary, lower prices. Soviet materials have to be s.nt to secure a, given of ign exchange. I stress this because & distortion of Soviet mtives 40s zr good in the long run. it 3at cozi.fuass the po3itics3 challenge of international iatmuniat in Weitevn Europe has been met and turned beck. Stimelated by Marshall Plan aid, Western Europe has undergone rapid economic growth over the pas decade; unemployment has largely disappeared, most currencies are 17 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 stable? and Communist every- loped nations dif nt its political iact on the d. Its ult motivation is to export Communism. ago v atated, tatiorLe is that obtaining between the nomically underdeveloped of course sgy that in this case OflOTdC relations are bated on mutual advantage from the commercial viewpoint, our economic cal aid to the underdeveloped countries is even arm unp'ofttab3. for us. Soviet motivation behind much of the created trade vity between the Communists and the newly independent countriee Ultimately to bring those countries into what Moscow calls, the Socialist camp.* This is not to be done in one step, of course. The initial stage consists of replacing traditional Western trade In these areas by Soviet Bloc trade. This has already been done in a limited number of countries. For example Iceland's fish now goes to the Soviet Bloc, not to the United Kingdom. Over 60 percent et Egypt's cotton exports are now to the Blocs not to Western Europe. Iraq is currently deriving more and more of its imports from the Mop less from the West. Soviet oil is now crucial to several small countries, and all nations receiving Soviet plant and equipment must return to the Bloc for maintenance and spare parts. Approved For Release 1999/09/08 .....Cif-rDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 woke of ear t.t's effort is Welly selective, About trade in underdeveloped areas is with only the same pattern of concentration which I aid is also true of Bloc trade a concen- tration on key target oountries. Theme expanded trade activities are, more re based on ihly complementary economies. Mbat the underdeveloped countries have to mill is overwhelmingly food, fibers, and industrial raw materials predmcts which can easily be absorbed by the Bloc. The 'European Satellites as a whoa* are now a deficit food producing area, and sbrqi were dependent upon imports for raw materials, The present low level of per capita consumption in the Soviet Bloc implies a great oapacity for absorbing the exports of many underdeveloped sountries. It follows logic te Soviet presence th the shift in marketing patterns, underdeveloped areas grows While that of the West diminishes, If Bloc economic blandishments and tha leaseive use of propaganda do not lead to an increase in the domestic appeal of Communion over time, there is no reason to believe that the Soviets will hesitate to use economic pressure to bring about state of affairs more to their liking. Once the economic vulnera bility has been created its exploitation along with other Soviet devices is a matter of timing. There we many fresh examples of the use of trade as a weapon the Soviet 19 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Soviets have thre*trnid to cut off it tMt t on allows SATO missile bases to be ir territory. *scow for a Seviat year by the withholding of for a, for Which the traditional has been the UI List ).cbsr, the Fizistt government fell, a victim of to ott sconade pressure. Angered by *fleet* of the linnish government to a etoisr to the West the Sevlots mere quick to react. ?hey cut oft petrels= Implies samoelled orders for menufactured goods refused to negotiate a trade agreement. Soviet economic pressure, vas *Mihaly seeramsted with political pressure by the linnieh Communiet Pertly- end with strong attacks by Soviet press and radio on the government of Finland /ram the beginning of the )lbsoow drive to the toppling of the ?eyehole goverment took only two months, suissarise this sommohat radia1:4/ presentation on the eoonsm frt, the 'lowing points appear to me most important. The !Wrists, year in and year out, devote a very montage of their economic resources to purposes of utimd policy, most prominently to defense and investment in heavy industry. w An * rri].t, the;r aohieved a rate of development Which nww 310t ort3,7 provide s thee with muscle needed to promote the external expansion Approved For Release 1999/09/08'1 titItRDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Approved For Release 1999/09/08 : CIA-RDP75-00001R000200550005-1 Communism,bt also serves a, powerful propaganda in sell Marxism to the peoples of the underdeveloped countries. ). the sbility to provide arms at out rate prices and v.1op*nt capital on attractive reelyment terms opens the to the pread of Communist 'monocle influence in kw underdeveloped countries. In these countries a pressure to reorient trade awe, from the West to the Bloc inevitably fellows. 4 economic penetration, to be understood, must the light of the total Soviet offensive propaganda, subversion, and political penetration in the underdeveloped nations. Trade and aid estiblieh the Soviet presence and provide a plausible front of disinterested helpfulness. 5. The Soviet leaders frankly admit that thefr vation in economic dealings with the new and fragile dineoracies is ultimately-to move these countries beyond neutralism into the Communist empire. Ones a condition of vaneribility has been brought about, history clearly shows the Kremlin will take advantage of its bargaining position. Approved For Release 1999/09/08 i.plik-FDP75-00001R000200550005-1