CHINESE ECONOMY IS FOUND LAGGING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000300210052-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 2, 2000
Sequence Number: 
52
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 7, 1957
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000300210052-5.pdf101.59 KB
Body: 
pane 7 'M 7 N.r w ? y Approved For-Release ? NTTT~TTYh?.~ r..v...T..--- rer .an-s Shonn? .ronv h ? ,v11LLiLAkI A i J%J ViiLi ! I JUIU) LUII\U U.S: Experts Say Output Is Below 1960 Levels CPYRGHT survey of the Chinese economic all Chinese economic growth situation ever published in Eng- Government and ' academic ex-l' achieved in modernizing mili- perts has found that Commu-; tary equipment. J. G. Godaire mist China's economy has lost' of the Central Intelligence much ground in the nineteen-] Agency suggests.that the stock sixties, and that the prospectst of modern arms, based on do- for substantial improvement in! mestic resources, may now be the years immediately ahead equal to the maximum domestic are poor. production of 1957-59 plus the These conclusions emerge value of the Soviet military aid from a symposium on the Chi-i given at that time. nose economy made public byMr. Godaire comments that; the Joint Economic Committee "domestic production of mili- i of Congress. Titled "An Eco- tary equipment seems to have i nomic Profile of Mainland Chi- had priority over the produc- na," the symposium's reports tion of civilian investment goods give the most comprehensive , at considerable cost to the over- Several of the articles raise the possibility that China may suffer economic retrogression in the period immediately ahead because of disruption caused by the Cultural Revolution. The darkest prospects appear to exist in agriculture where, according to Marion R. Yarsen of the Department of Agricul- ture, the food situation 'was tight even before recent disor- ders. "A serious decline in the ipon output in agriculture `" - W.-.. w"`-""- vhere substantial production lion from trade and services, a increases are unlikely. 10 per cent gain over 1957. Tl th d The Joint Economic Commit- author, Dr. Robert M. Field of the Central Intelligence Agency, concludes that at best by 1970 the Peking regime's "misguided economic policies . . . will have cost China a full decade's indus- trial growth." Dr. Field expects slow Chi- nese industrial growth, in the coming years because' of the ontinuing drain of China's atomic and other weapons pro- grams on resources needed for heavy industry and because con- agricultural sector" could result if recent political unrest persists into the period of farm work, according to the report. Paper by C.I.A. Men. A review of China's industry concludes that the country will be fortunate if it is able to regain the 19660 peak of indus- trial production by 1970. The baan slow, other countries have been . increasing their output rapidly. Data presented by Dr. Field, for,example, indicate that India's industrial output rose about 40 per cent between 1960 and 1965, while China's indus- trial production was almost 20 per cent below the 1960 level in 1965. The most impressive eco- A picture of Chinese economic growth is presented by data on gross national product the total production of goods and serv- ices, by Prof. Ta-Chung Liu of Cornell University. Data on China's G.N.P. Expressed in the Chinese monetary unit, the yuan, and in constant prices, the data in- dicate that the gross national product rose from 71.4 billion yuan in 1952 to a peak of 108 billion yuan in 1958. Then the gross national product fell to a low of 92.2 billion yuan in 1961 and finally reached the 1958 level once again in 1965. Yuan values cannot be easily ex- pressed in dollar terms. An alternative gross-national- product calculation in dollar terms is presented by Edwin F. Jones of the State Department. .tie estimates that the Chinese gross national product grew from about 65-billion in 1957 to $73.3-billion in 1965, or just enough to keep per capita pro- duction, for a rising population, constant at $101 annually. In 1965, Mr. Jones estimates, output consisted of $33.7-billion from agriculture, an 8 per cents gain over 1957; $21.5-billion from.industry, construction and transport a 24 per cent 'in- tee,. an informed source said yesterday, intends -to hold five days of hearings next month on the Chinese economy, hear- in, testimony on the papers just publis'ncd as well as expert evalu