CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-APPENDIX

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP75-00001R000300360030-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: November 11, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 3, 1998
• Sequence Number: 30
• Publication Date: June 11, 1958
• Content Type: TRANS

Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00001R000300360030-3
AfORI BUNDLE II DATE
PAGES
Box
Foicler-#
For
BEST COPY
AVAILABLE
Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00001R000300360030-3
9 -4
??
JUN 1119543
Sanitized - ArgaMERSIO1cRDILIAGORI31A- 001R01511110110/00a115339_,
r "e give high school scholarships to
i? ? %It can quality. We give
i ?,.holarshipe in the United States
-11 mpetil Ivo basis to PertIVILD ern-
e, who are graduate engineers. On
41.1pct?isory staff we employ more Peru-
, ? , ungliteers than all other natiDnalities
*^,.;cih('r, and would rather employ ?
than an American or Canadian if
? 'oe rp:ellficatione and experience were In
wny comparable. which they more and
?I' ,)!* C11tiP We pay them salaries corn-
n' with their positions. We have a
department for the workers, to
.n LA) advance in their jobs, to be-
? m productive and therefore earn
? -t. 'Motley Workers are housed in camp-
with covered cement floors,
and plumbing. '
o n g the lead-rIne IndustzT, there
,w-cost and efficient producers in this
iii tory, and they will, of course, stay In
t,usines,, It Is the high-cost producers from
....r;.!!nal mines with very low-grade ores
ii ii must face the economic facts of life.
hue you will take the time to read the
e,. itstements I have, on various ?ors.
made rt-cently. 1 am very symps-
W.th anyone in any line of buainfais
ii f's Lunt make a living at It, but in tAle
run Government subsidies and tariffs
tint 'the answer. nor should they be In
,>otelv
Sint ertly yours,
Itostar P. Koran?, President.
Great Wort-
EXTENSION OF REMARKS
OF
. HON. EMMET F. BYRNE
or li..t.xxote
VC :HE 110USE OF IISPRESENTATIVILS
Wednesday, June 11, 1958 ?
Mr. BYRNE of Plincils. Mr. Speaker,
my attention was"directed recently to a
word of praise to the Chicago Policeman
and fireman, appearing in the South-
town Economist of May 28.
For many years I have been a defense
trail lawyer and have spent many
hours with various Chicago policemen ?
My admiration and respect, as well as
rily affection for thens? is a deep thing. A
v.o-uti policeman and a fireman is some-
..tie who merits tile respect and coopera-
I :on of every citizen desiring law and
u-der, protection from those who would
hvrin us or protection and rescue from
;ir. hitt) could destroy/ not only our
P71)1' .rty but our life.
:
believe that Chicago can certainly
tie pi oud of our police and fire depart-
tents.
Two Chicago detectives who reside In
my disci iet.have performed meritoriously
recently. had It not been for their quick
:ictions, a child ? might have been mur-
dered 1 wish to commend Steve Hanna,
514 2 Soul II Loomis and Joseph Nolan,
74 o..) South Claremont, both of Chicago,
well as the other policemen who as-
:?1..:ted In apprehending the criminal. ?
When our public servant., do some-
tiitttg praiseworthy, they should be given
it thank you. They have a difficult VI*
?I a oft to perform.
"I Aoinmendation follows:.
011AX WOLK
The late Mayor Thompson used to say that
the reason everybody likes firemen is that
firemen save lives, and that the reason so few
like policemen is that police put people be-
hind bars.
But two Bouttitown residents who are po-
licemen deserve public" applause for putting
behind bars a dangerous criminal who today
would be held for murder instead of kidnap-
ping had not the two policemen acted
quickly.
We refer to Detectives Steve Hanna, 8142
South Loomis Boulevard, and Joseph Nolan.
7405 South Claremont Avenue. When they
learned that a 7-year-old child had been
seised from a schoolyard, they rushed in
their car to the scene of the kidnaping and
traced the route taken by the criminal.
They had him In. custody within 32 minute('
after be had taken the terrorized child.
Commendation also is deserving of all the
other police, including those from 'Blue Is-
land, who joined in the mass manhunt. 'The
performance of au was ezemplary..
?
Ceniervativet Debate on Oppenheimer at
Harvard
EXTENSION OF REMARKS
or
HON. W1NT SMITH .
OF KANSAS
IN THE HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES
Wednesday, June 11, 1958
Mr. SMITH of Kansas. Mr. Speaker,
much has been written about the so-
called Dr. Oppenheimer case. is com-
mon knowledge that Dr. Oppenheitner
delivered some lectures at Harvard.
Many people were somewhat mystified
that Harvard should invite him to de-
liver these lectures.
The following articles illustrate 'err
clearly the difficulties that surround any
group when, they try to counteract the
actions of the so-called liberal crowd.
It is strange indeed that the great and
illustrious institution of Harvard that
has so proudly proclaimed truth; liberty,
and freedom And, above all else, academic
freedom, should invite Dr. Oppenheimer
over the protests of the students.
It is somewhat difficult to make these
ancient heritages of Harvard stand UP
in view of the difficulties jorefiented to
some conservatives when they wanted to
know the ,whYfOrs of Dr. OsPenheliner's
Invitation.
I commend the articles by Milian'
Brady: .
CONS,121VATIVSS DissaTX ON OrPersrtLIMSX AT
Mimeo ?
(Bp William Cuthbert Brady, founder of the
Harvard Conservative club)
riarvard's time-honored watchword, -Vert-
tas," was compromised with tpis appoint-
ment of Dr. J. Robert Oppenheftw? as Wil-
liam James lecturer?over the protests of
? alumni and students. The Issue is: Should
Harvard lend its name and prestige to a con-
leased liar and security risk as a philosopher?
Alumni opposition to the appointment, was
spearheaded by Col. Archibald A Hotisevelt
and Mr. Kenneth D. Robertson. Jf.,. trAtabert
of the Barnard Veritaa Committee. TUC
rallying point for student protest became
4
the Harvard Athenaeum. an undergrativate
conservative debete organisation.t ? -
This organisation prepared a.10-page rneM-
. greed= on the Oppenheimer eye and sent
copies, together with letters requesting In?ce-
matlofl on why and how Oppenheimer was
se teg the lectures. to Judge Charles S..
e
, chairmen of the board of over-
seers, and Dr. Nathan M. Posey, president of
the university and the corporation. Judge
Wysanald replied ? that the corpus detect! is ?
not in the board of overseers. , Mr. Pusey re-
plied that he hardly thought it necessary to
continent on Oppenheimers qualifications for
the lectureship, since they speak for them-
selves. ?
To encourage a more balanced perspective
on Oppenheimer in the University, the Athe-
'nee= decided to sponsor a debate on the
topic: Should Oppenheimer Be Janus Phil-
osophy ,Lscturee at: Harvard, The debate
Idea mit with the Solid option, of liberal
professors at Harvard and MamieseWi en-
*Unite of Technology (In an., 14 were asked
to defend Oppenheimer, all Oen:1100;14th
Use result that the Athenaeum was obliged
to seek Wilmette, speakers elsewhere. MD.
tually obtaining them through the Amerioui
Civil 1.4bertlea.Union. The poop would not
be dissuaded from holding the debate simply
because the liberals had decreed against It
The debate was finally held on Tuesday.
April le, at Phillips Brooks Howe, Defend-
mg the Oppenheimer appointment were At-
tornel Reward S. Whiteside, counsel for the
American Civil Liberties Union, and Dr. Chase
Kimball. also connected with the ACLU and
former professor or law at Boston University.
Opposing them were two gentlemen who
readily agreed to participate in the debate:
Dr. Medford Ream. Professor of seder science
at Northirestern State College of Loufalana
and for 8 years Chief of Training in the
Atomic Energy Commission, and Dr. Will..
moor, Kendall, prefessor of political science
at Tate University and av editor of National
Review. '
pr. Kimball, !fret speaker for the affirms.
live. leaned ;the debate discourteous to Op.:
penheimer. He spoke in 'general about free
speech ahd academic freedom, and said that
these principles required -that Oppenheimer
be allowed to speak at Harvard. -
Dr. Evans. the next -speaker, emphasised
that Oppenheimer. by his own aduiredbn. had
told "a whole fabrication and tissue of lies"
in great circumstantial detail to security ca-
ters fp Wartime, and that "Opple" had been
lees than candid on other occasions. Hepre:
Dented evidence that, instead of tying tupro-
tect his friends. Oppenheimer had actually
sold them out.
ACLU Attorney WItitetides rebuttal con-
sisted largelf of a rehearsal of Oppenheimers
achievements** a scientist, together with the
observation that he was more than Necien-
tist. Recalling Oppeniteimere brilliant sw-
ami in directing production of . the ant
litomic bombs, Whiteside ' stated; "No evi-
dence has ever been produced that informa-
tion ?Iras lost to the Vatted States by
earthing he did."
, Professor Kepdell. Ina/ speaker for the
nevittre; chmacterfeed the appointment as
en instrument for rehabilitating Oppen-
heimer'. reputation and for discrediting the
Governments security program. The main
teasolt for oPPollind OPPenheimer's appoint-
meat% SS James 'Lecturer. Zendall stated. was
?
a''he dissenters did not object to Oppen-
heimer's coming per is: as the guest at an
undergraduate eirtralrarricular group, be
would have excited Uttle protest, if any. Un-
der the ofliciel sponsorship of the university,
however, his arrival involved everyone at
Harvard.
1 .
Sanitized - Approved For Release: CIA-RDP75-00001R000300360030-3