IN WASHINGTON, U. S. BUOYS UP KHANH

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000300490061-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 20, 1998
Sequence Number: 
61
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 25, 1964
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000300490061-5.pdf97.83 KB
Body: 
Approved; For Release 2000/08/2&EQff.'.1 R000 AUG 25 1964 FOIAb3b By Laurence Barrett C 0/ Th[ Jl,,aId 7'rihune iter,' WASIIINGTON. The State Department yesterday spoke out in defense of Gen. Nguyen Khanh's regime, whose already un- certain hold on South Viet Nam in being further threat- ened by Buddhist and student demonstrations. "The United States govern-" ment fully recognizes the need for national unity in South ' Viet Nam and is, therefore, supporting the Khanh govern- ment as the best means of building such unity at the same time that the war effort Is'being prosecuted;" a State Department spokesman said. "Obviously anything . of a divisive nature is neither In the interest of the Viet- namese government nor its. people." . As a rule,. the State Department avoids making official pronouncements about, the internal affairs of other countries. That, it chose to go''_ N, U: S. BUOYS UP KIIANH .on the record yesterday was a spark both of Washington's deep involvement In Saigon's fate and of the concern felt here about the current civil disorders In South Viet Nam. High officials keeping in close touch with events in South Viet Nam said pri- vately that so far the demon- strations did not appear to be at the crisis stage. There was some fear, how-.' ever, that the troubles would follow the snowballing pat- ftern of those just a year ago which resulted in the over- throw of President Ngo Dinh Diem In November. So far, It was understood, the American mission in Sai- gon has reported to Washing- ton no evidence of commu- nist Involvement In the riots, Officials here ascribed the troubles to three factors: Con- tinuing frustration over the seemingly endless war and its impairment of civil liberties; ' ~" '"" '-' a- Leon was obviously unhappy the fact that examinations sary" and that possibly the about the timing and manner war might end with "some of the report's 'disclosure, have just concluded and it .is kind of negotiated settlement. CIA had cleared the paper'for. , based upon neutralization." publication-- Presumably , In Although the report was lull--in a scholarly1ournal. " 11 dated June 9 1964 th , , e Viet- namese section was written in February, just two or three weeks after President Khanh . assumed power. Its apparent pertinence to the situation today, therefore, does not seem great. the normal When for students Khanh government. And it to let off steam; the anniver-i would play into the hands of, sary this month of the Bud- S^n. Barry Goldwater, who is dhist-government fight of a making a major camnnt? ?i year ago. .,,ue with the charge that the One of the hopeful factors Administration is being too is that thus far, at least, the timid with the Communists Khanh government has dealt. in Southeast Asia. rather gently with the dem- The Administration made onstrators. The Diem regime, public the report, entitled attempted repression. This re "Trends in the World Situa suited only In new disorders. tion," Friday night after Meanwhile, the State De- learning that one newspaper' partment and others con- `. had access to it. But officials tinued to deny that a report. stressed that the document written by a Central Intelli- . was simply one man' opinion. Bence Agency officer and That man is Willard Mat made public over the week, thias, a member of CIA's end had any official status. ' Board of National Estimates, which distills information The report covered the en- from all American intelli- tire Cold War front and gence units and attempts to touched only briefly on Viet draw conclusions from -this Nam. However, It said that material for the benefit of there was "serious doubt" the National Security Coun-: victory could be won, That cil, the State Department Diem's. successors have not and the Defense Department, .yet demonstrated the leader-. Although the Administ.,a_ can officials, both here and In Saigon, agree In varying degrees with the conclusion.; that complete victory over the Viet Cong seems unattain- able. It would be most damag-" Ing for the Administratiop to admit this. Such. an admis- 1 sion would be of psychologi-1 4 cal benefit to the Viet Cong. ? LTt Would further weaken,theI Apprqved For: Release 20.0010e126 :-CIA-RDP75=00001 RQ0O30104 9961 ~5