CIA - - BLACK OPERATIONS IN 'DIRTY TRICKS DEPARTMENT'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000400190065-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 28, 2000
Sequence Number: 
65
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 29, 1966
Content Type: 
PREL
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000400190065-3.pdf140.72 KB
Body: 
Y'~AL'1'liti UtiUNtSl'1'~ ~? I 1-pa.~.a. ~:v, ~.~~~~ ~nnrn~iprl Fnr RPIPacP 7000/08/ 6 IA-RDP7 G00001 ROOOd001 A006 - STATION pA NtTW01l~TOP Radio, CBS CIA -- BLACK OPERATIONS IN "DIRTY TRICKS DEPARTMENT" WALTER CRONICITE: Todayta report -~ more an the CIA. Eerily this+we?k, one of theov broadvasts touvhod on the sub~evt of the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGEI~'CY -- the CTA -- and its r?lation to our domocrativ society. There was spocifia reforvnae to a case pending in~Baltimore fod4ral court, where it seemed apparent the t a traditional ~udiaial process was being abandoned in the name of national sevurity. Novr its clear thatts aaactly what hsa happen?d. The litigation involy?a tyro Estonian refugees >- one of thorn is Juri Raus, who has been revealed as an agent for the CIA. Rous i$ being sued for slander by Erio Hoino, ~rhom Raus publicly labeled an agent far the Sowiet oovrot polioo. Attorneys for th? CI A Herr claim that Rnua is? lvgr~lly immune from th? slander vhargv, beaacisv of his privileged role as a government ag?nt. They also Maim that Raus mAdo the char~r? .against Heinn on specific instructions from hie superiors in the. Int?lligdnve Agency, and they insist that a triAl, which would rQquire the CIA to produce witnassrss in support of its claims about Raus and Hoino would not be in the intore,st of the sovurity of the Unit?d States. Offioiala say such app?aranc?s would furthest compromise the s?cre~vy of .the CIA. It ~i-s .not poaaible for a layman to confirm or dopy the lvgitlmavy of the CIA claims about the stAtus, of agent Raus. It is clear -? and .lawyers for the Amoriaan Civil Liberties Union confirm it -- that Heine, ~vho alai~~s he was slandered, is being denied due process. This in itself contravenes constitutional guarantoea of impartial juatioe. Outright disregard for long established Judicial practices hardly seems the way to defend democravy. At the very least bad judgment is involved. If it wore necessary f~ the agenoy to stay out of the limelight in the Rous- Heine ease, it r~ouid have been I'ar;.mQre~:prudent, it eeeme~ ' to Yet the slander ease go by defau9.t. ~ ~ ~ .A good man~- Amerioana are disturbed about what theg deem ' Approved.;F`or Release 2000/08/26 : 'CIA=RDPZ~~Q:0:~0'4~~~ Approved For Release 2'000/08/26 :CIA-RDP75-000018000400190065-3 2 .. "slippery" quAlities of tha CIA, in dealing not wi~L?h onotny, but with the Am?rican public. Sonator J. W. Fulbright~s now challenging vahat h? calls a CIA effort to propagandize the American public. More on that after . Sts propaganda activities. This is Walter Cronkite . . . Sonator Fulbright has noted that an articl.o about the Vi?t Cong, writtQn by a CZA employee, appears in th? current isnuo5of "Foreign Affairs" quart?rly. Tha autho~+, Gearge Carver, is not ido~i~ifiod as a CIA man. Fulbright maintains this unacknowledged connection with th? CTA moans the article may win accaptanoe as an independent evaluation, rather than a governor?nt a~+vraisal of the sub~eot covered. Fulbright believes wide use of such an int?rnal .propaganda roothod could debase the currency of Atne~rican scholars -and foreign policy experts. Sti11 another point, the importance of the CIA, as an information gathering agency is unquestion?d -- but there must and should be, reservations about its ao-called "'black operations in the dirty triaka~ department -- even greater reservations about Approved. Fo_r' R~1~,as.e 2000/D8/~6 ~~~~I~i,=RDP`~5'00001~ROC~t~~0:0190065-3