OUR TWO POLICIES ON TWO CHINAS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000400490004-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 13, 2003
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 20, 1963
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000400490004-7.pdf120.96 KB
Body: 
11 HO D Approved For ReleasjQ 2003/12/02 : CI z 1v ~ur Two Policies . : On Two Chinas. Vi By Marquis Chiidp AS THE pressure' of the Commut1 is ' in Laos Increases 'a familiar' tliadow once again darken%~the eastern horizon. Because United ' Siteg_ policy i ignore! Red China does not mean that it' will conveniently fold up, nor does it mean that the increasing thrust of Chinese imperalism will not, be felt throughout all of Asia. If there are two Chinas-Formosa and Chiang Kai-shek and the Communist mainland-there are' also two China' policies within the Government here. Powerful forces in the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency have not, abandoned the view that American in- terests in the Far East can. never be t +* 4 safeguarded short of a direct coniron? Leashed, Kirk because" IIt" 'Mtt~'~' one-third the size of Cuba with nearly retiring chief of na twice the population--as a theoretical some this seemed alternative to the Red .dictatorship. view If the tank nt, the mainLLi l but he has signed an eth with t for.' or Ie United Stites. Official policy set by the Portugal. President Is opposed to any. Invasion. ors attempt jrould, under present Cirpum+ +U nr a' aam~rat, post. Ii~m stances, ' e suicidal. has taken Oe Formosa post. 12v"10 ? ( NATO naval forces ad the WH, , POINTS this up are rprurrins irl..r w.b he .s......sa .....a _a. 1._A f r! # e act that a high civilian offs. ? Uttie imagination-Is required 1o "e cis; -,1 se Pentagon went to Formosa ,;,the consequences W an, attempt by spe udly to tell the Gimo, short for Chiang to land perhaps a division( nthe Gt ra)L'simo, that his invasion plans China coast some time' this' ktttnmer'i er Jd not be realized without massive when weather conditions are nloet'fa- Y/ited States support which would. not. vorable. This would be in the belief that forthcoming, a troubling doubt . the invasion would set flame to'riride? f a o in tf di ect conflict with China. And ar re. final recommendations are passed Wit. de 1 - ----- -- ~^-- -?w uayavaualaaa; aaiclll. vii gala i-C&LUVWu;'4R?~ means, tvertheless to make the try. He, went to the CIA as one of the'124rbem*:+ has h1 trong support in the past from ? bers'1of the Board of National Eitl4** te,- the 1,' ftsgon-CIA faction that bellevds which does the final U 1? bK o cou uLO.,vajICla,, -sail auC WLLLWR41$L `fhe question, in short, is: Who's in, - ctatorship. ah4 1l" c11irge here? The degree to which CIA It was on that same assumption the i i n recent years shaped policyt to fiasco of the Bay of Pigs invasigK was to by the acts of CIA operatives with unhappily based. ttost?unlimited, unvouchered . funds With disaster looming Chiang would , '. independents on-the-scene authority send up a cry for American help. And (1l-t mrlght, made himself 'an advocate breach between Russia and ChU* gnd. IL. .Ta._ V_w.-_J.. ._.l _ -___ . . .. . V. ormosa cannot be measured. For , touch off a chain reaction so far-rt~ch- '~ m~rly fhn... vnewa Kanln..1.... In 1119ZA iw.. .._ _a-_ --- - . .. /lctld say six-Asian capital; the CIA help would be to invite the cis fo1' ctdef has exerted the real authority a4 the China lobby and the Rep n I a%tinst the American ambasador duly ' opposition that the Democrats the I accredited to the country. only party that lost China twice. The degree of direction from the CIA But to go to Chiang's rescne would i F p ` % 'a to Moscow.4maF l A Foos[ 0Tj?a -R jig P7 III with instructions to keep Chiang old recurring dilemma of Chino.