SOVIET TROOPS STILL IN CUBA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000200190010-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 24, 1999
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 3, 1963
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000200190010-2.pdf178.06 KB
Body: 
r FOIAb3b ~ APR ~ i963 Approved For Relea~~l'A4/14 : CIA-RDP75-001498000 .A 1998 - CONGRESSIONAL RECORD policy will be applied to the Department of Agriculture's role of providing factual quotations from the report: Tho commercial vegetable index dropped 8 percent during the month. The March index (for dairy products) was 3 . percent below a year earlier and lowest' for the month since 1956. Lower prices for eggs and commercial broilers dropped the index 1 percent dur- ing the month to 155. I point out these instances of declin- ing farm prices as a means of explaining the continued decline of -the farmer's parity ratio and more specifically; the farmer's income. I do this for the pur- pose of keeping the record straight as to the tea 'effect of the administration's .farm olicfes. Soviet Troops Still in Cuba EXTENSION OF REMARKS ' ' HON. STEVEN .B. IDEROUNIAN - ~- OF NEW YORK - TN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES .Monday, April i, 1963 Mr. DEROUNIAN. Mr. Speaker, the following editorial appeared recently in the Paris .edition of the N~,ga.,;'Yo3?l~.I3sr~ a~d.~I~buz~e. Under leave to extend my remarks; I''am pleased to call to the at- tention of the- House the ,Herald Trib- une's excellent commentary on the con- tinued presence of Soviet troops in Cuba. A ~L7;Rif'YeX(~:PRSSFItI-~tAT,1i~R A not-so-funny thing happened on the way to no place at all this week. At his news conference, President Kennedy was' asked athree-part question. Did the administration have accurate information on the number of Soviet troops actually with- drawn from Cuba? 'Was Mr. Kennedy satis- fled with the rato of withdrawal? Was-there any arrangement with the Soviets fox?.'veri- flcation of the withrlrawal7 ?NO," said the. President, "tho answer to your question would really be 'No' to all of .them." He grinned. The' reporters broko into laughter.- And that was that. It may have been a clever way to handle an embarrassing question, but the answer--- ox? at least its implications-didn't strike us as particularly amusing. Or reassuring. The situation in Cuba is'certainly better today than it was last October, before Mr, ' Kennedy forced tho Soviets to dismantle their offensive missile bases. But it's far worse than it was a year ago, or 2 years ago. And ono of the principal rehsons is the con- tinued presence of those Soviet troops which, tho President acknowledged, are not being .withdrawn at a Paco he considers satisfac- . tort'. Nor are l:Ixost other Americans likely to consider the pace satisfactory. The tx?oopa may not be preparing to in- vade Miami, but they do constitute a clear and present danger to the hemisphere. They are in Ouba precisely because it suits Mr. Khrushchov's purposes to keep them there. -And we ail know what his purposes are. Khrushchev, CiASI%r0 and Co. "aim t0 sub- sphere and we have recently been treated- it is pointed. out, that "in Poland, per capita to some expert. testimony by, CIA Director power output increased tenfoldl' There MGCone.On' the extent;.-pf CUbaA 2fPOitB. to are many other statistics leading to the 5c ort r v i NCr C old ~ ----- -~?--` " e p olut , e on: ' _;the .,-Mc one t Houso' ~I{oreigu ;"Affairs ., Corx3mittee ,.that_~:"at leasl;??'1~,000 'to '1,500'`pexsoxis"" from" other Latin American countries went to Cuba in 196& for training in such subjects as sabo- tage and guerrilla warfare. Soviet "tech- nicians" can play a major role In such train- ing; they also bolster tho Castro regime against threats from the Cuban people. And as long as they remain, the possibility re- mains that "Mr, Khrushchev might Clandes- tinely reintroduce his missiles. Whatever their activities in Cuba, we can be sure of one thing: we-the free nations of the hemisphere-are the target of those activities. Mr. Khrushchev didn't send his" troops to the "Caribbean for a: holiday, and he isn't keeping -them there to sgare them a Moscow winter- The Reds'=What IVow? EXTENSION OF REMARKS of - In this connection, it may seem strange that I suggest that you study the March- April 1963, number oY Mission. Thin, mini- ature magazine is a publication of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen. In pointing out the Com-., munist persecxxtion of the Catholic Church, it dwells conspicuously on Red Poland, We are reminded that Cardinal Wyszynski suffered several years in prison, that 91 priests were killed, 260 disappeared without trace, and that 550 were deported. We are also told that 2,133 Catholic churches were closed. We learn, too, surprisingly, that two priests were sent to prison for 3 years for. translating Bishop Sheen's own books into Polish. Excellency is not concerned with any pa. tical or economic aspects in giving 'us his review." But we as laymen and as American citizens can soberly ask ourselves: What sort of friendly "imago" is the United HON. EIDVVARD J. DERWINSKI OF ILLINOIS IN THE ROUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES- LVednesday, April 3, 1963 Mr. DERWINSKI. Mr. Speaker, the' Brooklyn Tablet, the weekly publication of the Roman . Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, N:Y., is one of the most re- spected and effective publications of this nature in the country. In it? issue of March 28, it carried an article by Louis F. Budenz which em- phasizes the obvious fact that aid to Red Poland strengthens Moscow. In view of the proposals in this year's foreign aid bill which have just been made at the insistence of the adminis- tration, shoyring extremely favorable consideration to Poland and Yugoslavia, I feel this article is extremely timely, and I insert it into ?the RECORD at this pointy , - THE REDS-WHAT NOWT-AID TO RED POLAND -STRENGTHENS MOSCOW (By Louis F. Budenz) Praise for foseph Stalin as "a good Marxist and good Communist," uttered by Khrushchev in -early March, to be under- standable, must be .linked up with a big Kremlin endeavor. As highlighted iu the February International Affairs, ,this is the' re-creation of Stalin's victims, the captive nation, into economic battering tame against the West. ' The aim of the enterprise, as set forth in that issue's leading article, "Council for Mutual .Economic Aid ilrxd the Six," is to provo "that the .planned socialist economy is superior to the 'coordinated' capitirtilist economy." The narrative covers the al- leged .differences between the Rod-ruled Council for "Mutual Economic Aid and the European Common Market. It i& naturally directed against us. ' . ~ RATES FIRST The first of Stalin's victims among the .captive nations, Poland,. now. 'allegedly stands highest as an .agency to destroy the freo world economically. Oi 273 industrial enterprises,. constructed in "the- Socialist countries" with Soviet technical assistance, States creating for itself, as some newspa- pers suggest, by giving favorable trade treat- went and support by aid to this atheistic , Communist regime2 - The answer -was furnished last year by Wiadyslaw Gomulka himself. He should know, for he is the head of the Polish Com- ? munist Party and the Red Polish Govern- ment. Gomulka has given an interview which was bitterly anti-American. The Worker of July I6 and 22 published it in full, and I invite you to look it up. SUPPORTS K. In the interview, Gomulka started right ofP by saying: "If it depended on the Soviet Union only, the prospect for peaco would be very bright indeed." But he showed that the United States was the other big factor in the international scene and that It in- dicated no desire for peace. From thence on,- he supported item by item Kixrushchev's de- mands on the free world. He raised aloft tho banner of peaceful coexistence, implying that America opposed such an idea. Gomulka knew Lull well that peaceful co- .existence had been the slogan under which Poland had been taken over by Stalin in agreement with Hitler. I have in my hand at this moment No. 9 of the Communist .International for 1939, tho predecessor as directive giver of the World Marxist Re- view. There w? have the speech of Premier V. M. Molotov of the Soviet Union on "Tho . Meaning oY the Soviet-German Nonaggres- sion Pact," in other words, the Hitler-Stalin alliance. His ch1eP thought is expressed thus: "In our foreign policy toward non- Soviet countries, we have always been. guided by Lenin's well-known principle of the peace- ? ful coexistence of tho Soviet state and of capitalist countries." So it was, that peaceful coexistence was the excuse for the betrayal of the West, -jxxst as it was for every other major Soviet move, In a word, as Gomulka knows, . peaceful coexistence constitutes that favor- able cover under which Soviet power can best advanco at any particular period. The great weapons of tho socialist bloc" against us economically are to be. i,wofold, says International Affairs. They are great ' joint electric power and~oil pipeline 5ysterns through all the Red-ruled countries and regimented trade with the West.. Socialist trade will gain because of its stable prices, which means ttxe cheap results of slaw labor. It is no wonder that. the Worker of March ' 17 advertises many Rod Polish products along with East Germari~exports as though they Approved For Release 2000/04/14 : C1A=RDP75-.00149R000~00190010-2