DODD SEEKING TO AMEND SUIT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000200300049-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 20, 1999
Sequence Number: 
49
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 26, 1966
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000200300049-7.pdf129.35 KB
Body: 
STATINTL Sanitized - Approved For Rele :2SII DP75-OO149R noaa Seeking To Amend suet 11 ' Pearson Statement a conspiracy to "induce, aid and A statement relca rd by abet" Dodd's employes to Peason's office said: remove documents ' from the "It seems to us that the drop-senator's office and later pub- ping of 10 significant counts is fished material from those an indirect admission that Dodd [ allegedly stolen documents, did accept compensation from companies for which he did favors, and that he did profit from the proceeds of campaign dinners. We intend to prosecute the defense of this suit vigorous- ly."' A statement released by Dodd's office, however, de- scribed the action as "measures that would insure trial at the earliest possible dale." In a motion for relief filed with the court, Sonnett said the action was taken to "concen- trate this case, on the fewest possible hard-core issues." His motion said the new suit 2. They inaccurately wrote that Dodd made a 1964 trip to %Vest Germany to aid Julius Klein, a Chicago public relations man who is a registered foreign agent for West German Inter- ests. Klein was the subject, of extensive publicity in the West German press after he was called by a Senate Foreign Relations Committee probe of foreign agents in 1963. The columnists said Dodd's ,trip was designed to help Klein "hang on to his clients" and that Dodd "accepted expensive gifts" from Klein in return for th e Moves to Withdraw 10 of 14 Charges By ROBERT WALTERS Attorneys for, Sen. Thomas J. Dodd, D-Conn., today moved -to drop 10 of the; 14 charges con- Itained in a libel suit Dodd filed against' newspaper columnists Drew Pearson and Jack Ander lson. Dodd's lawyers also reduced their damage claim- from $5 ,million' to $2 'million, waived their. right to a .jury. trial, asked ;for assignment of a single judge. to the case and said they hoped the suit would be brought_.to trial, by July., .. The developments came in a series of legal papers filed in U.S. District Court here by John F. Sonnett and Donald Mulvi-. hill,' the a ttorneys who have represented Dodd since the initial suit was filed May 6. Among the charges dropped by Dodd were charges that the columnists inaccurately report- led the senator's 'two-year log of a car from a Connecticut businessman and the senator's alleged transfer of campaign funds for personal use. Remaining Allegations The amended suit against the tcolumnists, contains one charge of conspiracy, ' two. specific allegations of libel and a fourth `count charging that the Pear- ,son-Anderson columns, taken together, have damaged Dodd's reputation. The move came as Dodd's attorneys were scheduled to take the first deposition in the case-a pretrial statement from James P. Boyd, the senator's former administrative assistant: Sonnett estimated that the examination of Boyd would take about three days. The ]text ings in this suit would subject; scheduled deposition is to be Sen. Dodd to continued assault l taken from Dodd by attorneys for the columnists. Elimination of the to earlier allegations would mean that charged that Pearson and' assistance. Anderson conspired to damage 3. They inaccurately wrote Dodds reputation only in 1965j'th3 Dodd ato subvert and 1966, while the initial suit attempted n1lannri Ihnt thn rnn-nirnrvlI U.S. foreign policy in the Congo began In 1958 and continued through this year. Shift on Depnsilions Sonnett had earlier said he in 1961 by "acting in cooperation with another foreign agent, Michael Struelens." Struelens, chief of information services for the breakaway Province of Katanga, had offices I wanted to take depositions from In this country but was ordered Ithe two defendants, two sccre-by the federal government to th i t e coun ry n 1962 ti i th bildih Iweave aresneung were. 4 Ther col mns ! k n "malice and reckless disregard". for the truth. Pearson and Anderson have written . more than 30 columns about Dodd j since late January. Earlier Allegations Among the earlier allegations by the columnists contested in the initial libel suit but not included in the amended com- plaint are charges that Dodd: 1. Accepted a two-year loan of a car from a Connecticut con- tractor and later interceded with federal agencies to gain government contracts for the businessman. 2. Diverted for his personal use funds raised at a series of testimonial dinners and ear- marked for campaign pur- poses, then failed to report the money on his federal income tax. Dodd claims the money represents tax-free gifts. 3. Accepted a "whopping $500,- 000" legal fee from the Team- sters Union, 4. Misused his position as a senator to reward the Korean government and several firms and individuals who had given gifts to him. The Senate Ethics Committee has announeed its intention to hold public hearings on Dodd's relationship with Klein, but has not yet scheduled a date for the Anderson works and five former together, tend tocast doubt on employes of Dodd. Dodd's ..ability to serve as a In his motion today, however, Sonnett said he was prepared to forego taking pretrial state- ments from at least two of the 'nine persons "and maybe able to forego some others, depend- ing on the truthfulness of those to be examined." Sonnett also charged' that the columnists were attempting to "delay and commercially exploit this case in every way poser ble." ! He further charged that Pearson and Anderson were "determined to cast reflections not only on the plaintiff, but as well on this court, on the Feder al Bureau of Investigation and on anyone else who refuses to. "Protracted pretrial proceed- in Pearson's column," said a statement released by . the 1 .1 senator's office. 'The remaining allegations against the . columnists are about them because the charges! these: - , . , ' 1 1 are no longer relevant to the] 1..They unlawfully'engagedin Case senator and were made with first session. . ' Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RbP75-00149ROO0200300049-7 '