(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000300180071-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 25, 1998
Sequence Number: 
71
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 15, 1961
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000300180071-5.pdf124.35 KB
Body: 
FOIAb3?Er, CPYRGHT ? 1I T Approved For I ei 117 F'resr en , obviously promp y Zlisappotnt.7 ,,, it in the Belgrade conference, has now taken a stand against non-alignment. After signing t? ioreeign aid authorization bill, he remarked: -It is my belief that in the administration of n r..e funds we should give great attention and onsideration to those nations who have our view of he world crisis." It seemed as if John Foster >ulles' doctrine that "neutralism" was "immoral"- )reviously repudiated by the Kennedy Administra- ion--was coming back into vogue again. FK vs. Nixon: President Kennedy slapped at ixon for "taking political advantage of our ditfi- ?ulties" so sharply that observers concluded that the orriher Vice President had struck at Kennedy's not vulnerable point. What Nixon had said (on olumbia Broadcasting System television) was that 'moving a few ground troops" into Berlin to scare 'lu?ushchev was "nonsense," and that the latter 'night well interpret it as weakness rather than 't r't'e gth ." ' 1 n :this remark, Nixon revealed himself as close to tie "unmuzzled" US military point of view- which he has been fdr many years. On September 1, IiI;N~Att EvEN'rs reported the military's fears that Kennedy's stance on Berlin had actually encouraged Khrushchev to aggression. Nixon also deserves credit marks on his consistent stand, on the issue of atomic testing. During the campaign, he demanded a "cut-off" date soon after the first of the year (1961) on test-ban talks and early test resumption if Russia stalled. Kennedy to(-;K a procrastinating line in the campaign which he followed up until now.? ? Nixon's stand on foreign aid, however, indicates that the Republican candidate of last fall still suffers from the "me-tooism" which apparently harmed his appeal to the people and presumably resulted in his defeat. This represents a double failure for Nixon, as follows: (1) he was unable to understand, as did GOP legislative leaders Halleck and Dirksen, that a grass-roots revolt against foreign aid was under way with explosive results in ('rurgress ; and (21 he failed to understand that the opinion of the grass-roots is that foreign aid, as op4rated by Ike and JFK, is discredited, is of pomitive danger to the country; and that the country is behind the military in placing first emphasis 'on power through weaponry and tough diplomacy instead of the "Santa Claus," be-nice-to-everybody (including neutralists) course of Eisenhower an Kennedy. This Nixon failure may lead to the furthe rise of Senator Barry Goldwater, who differs o this issue from Nixon and. Rockefeller and wh understands the basic issue of the internationa power situation. Warnin Not Heeded: The National Broad casting (. rnpan ?'s Berlin bureau chief, Piers Ander t''11, reported la isl1tmz der Appd"omMEare Communist design to seal off East Berlin and virtually annex it to East Germany in violation o all existing agreements between East and West Anderton said the news came to Western powers through a minor East German bureaucrat who fled to the West bearing a document showing in detail an East German plan to cut off the flow of refugees to West Berlin. The East German plan, said Anderton, was the following: First, a barbed-wire fence "would be thrown up along the 25?mile. border between East and West Berlin. This would stop all' East Germans from going to West Berlin. It the fence went un- challenged, the Communists would build a cement wall along the boundaries through the center of the city." (This plan was not utilized in 1958, pre- sutnably because Khrushchev was aware of Eisen- hower's determination to wage all-out nuclear war, if necessary, to stop it.) 'T4t$ 'llieoreElcal''s the 'Reds planned to use in 1958 has become a reality today, said Ander- ton. What diplomatic observers on Capitol Hill would like to have answered is why Kennedy failed to have any plans to stop the erection of the East Berlin barricade since our government had been orewarned of the Communist plans. irting with Fidel: It becomes apparent Capitol Hill that the Kennedy Administration, far from pressing a program to rid Latin America of the Castro dictatorship, is following a. program of reconciliation toward the Cuban despot. Some of the press.last week reported Administra- tion attempts to learn to live with Castro in order to quiet things down. It also told of the growl frustration this policy is bringing to anti- Cubans. Anti-Communists, of course, found th meeting in Montevideo between Che' Guevara and Kennedy Latin American adviser Richard Goodwin (HUMAN EvENTS, September 8) very disconcerting. HUMAN EvENTS now,learns that Goodwin has bee meeting in the White House with another Cast man, An agent who - is . here ostensibly as a new paperman. An authoritative source tells us tha this agent fed Goodwin the current Cuban lin that Fidel is on the ropes and can only hold out fo a few months. This argument, it is thought, being bought by the New Frontier as an excuse fo continued inactivity. JFK will "wait and see' regarding Cuba-- rQfrain from harassing the TO OUR READERS ... The changed appearaaee in your address is due to our new addressing system, forced upon as by our increase to circulation. We are limited to the-use of two initials only for the first name. If tho content or form of your address is incorrect, please send us the envelope from this issue, marked for corrections, which will be made within the limits of the system. Allow four weeks for changes to eas t?e1 tDP75-00149R000300180071-5