TWO SENATORS SUPPORT CIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000400110007-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 13, 2000
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 26, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000400110007-2.pdf73.38 KB
Body: 
Approved, Fpr Fe~sseg2000/09/14: CIA-R 170^JD-llEttAI-D; Ll - 126,455 S - 273,599 a 6 1967 :,_,i ..., ; ,.:~ `~..1 ~ is ~. ~,? ~ ~''~: , voiced support, for the.Central closure that the CIA's subsid- By Darwin ulofson Secret Subsidizing 3i 3 hey Differ About" "That type of activity has republic came into being," he "Fundamentally, the CIA iq. viously could be vefy useful He is a member of the Sen- ate Appropriations. Commit- tee, some of whose members are on the CIA "watchdog" committee. - Senator Curtis said the CIA obviously was operating under higher Government authority, in financing private groups. He said lie felt it was up to' the Congressional panel, that deals with the CIA to decide whether its- supervision ` was adequate. He said he believed that in' dealing with student and other; g r o u p s, the Government", "could have used the front door instead of the back',; door." It could 'have acted more' openly through Government, officials identified as such, hei contended. elaborated, he would not fault the operation. Senator Carl Curtis said: "I am not critical of the CIA for recognizing the need, for their objectives or for their; concern that the'Communists would use every student or- ganization they could puts their hands on." errors in Judgment But Senator Curtis said he i t... "ht the CIA, or Govern-1 ment cfficials in positions of authority, had made "some' errors in judgment and proce-,, dure." biit too'. somewhat different ing vwith National Security j views of its secret subsidizing :,Council polices established in of a variety of private organ- 1952 through 1954 puts the izations. +, agency "in a more solid posi- Senator Roman Hruska said tion," according to Senator he was "not inclined to criti--~Hruska. cize," unless it could be shown ! He said he was opposed to the CIA deliberately sought !any investigation of the CIA to subvert the organizations. by Congress and had confi So long as the organizations', den in the present Congres remained faithful to their ob- )f sional supervision of the in' jectives and membership,, he telligence unit. - - :goals "sound and in the pub-,; lic.interest." Senator Hruska ' said the' He emphasized, however' that he considered the CIA's,' openly. agency is in the business of ' : spying, which cannot be done! FOIAb3b -CPYRGHT CPYRGHT Approved For Release 2000/09/14: CIA-RDP75-00149R000400110007-2. .