NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

LIE TESTING PERIL SEEN BY PROBERS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000400150010-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 29, 1999
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 12, 1964
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000400150010-4.pdf70.26 KB
Body: 
Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP WAS}UNGTON POST AND TIMES HERALD APR t ?. 1964 I,ie Tes~ng `~' 4~Pe~il ~~en Probers'. the device in interpreting physical signs-as recorded. By David Kraslow The Loa Anielel Tlrnss congressional committee investigating use of the lie detector by Federal agencies seems to have established this basic point: Be wary about polygraph (lie detector) examinations. Not because there Is anything wrong with the machine---as a machine-but because of strik- ing ,testimony 'that most of the people who operate the "ma chines have no business doing so. Contrary to what may be ,.popular belief, the polygraph `does not detect lies., That is "done by the person operating On-e source close to the com- mittee does not rule out the possibility that the committee will recommend that the Fed- eral Government abolish the use of the polygraph for job applicants. "At the very least," he Bald, "the committee will recoiri- mend tough Government-wide standards for polygraph' test- ing." The committee is clearly dis- turbed by the absence of cen- tral control in the Government over the use of what Inbau said could be a "dangerous" Instrument in the hands of an unqualified or unscrupulous examiner. changes induced by various;. Inbau, It should be noted, , questions. stanchity defended the poly- In the words of chairman' five aidsprovidedbthe exam in- John E. Moss (D-Calif.) of a, er is qualified. The difficulty House Government Operations; is that even experts disagree Subcommittee: "The human on what constitutes a qualified being Is the, lie detector, not. examiner. the machine. Then the is this observa Polygraph testing has grpwn tion of Prof. Fred E. Inbau of within the Federal Govern- the Northwestern University being men paid with to little the attention rc e. Law School: "Eighty per cent The practice. of the persons operatin T Moss committee's inquiry g poly- appears to be the first under- graphs do not measure up to taken on Capitol Hill on a the standards we feel' are required." Government-wide. basis. Neither ststatement was cha4- According to the committee's lenged er Lg.'the committee's study, 19 Federal agencies, em- 639, , hearings last week. The effect th peyipg g the used ra. phexaminers was that a committee that al- year ended e- i3 ?0the fiscal ready was hostile to the use of Yed June 3, 1963, . lie detectors is even more so More than 23,000 tests were with expert testimony on the given, largely by military in. ,record.' ..~ te11 ence,and police agencies. FOIAb3b' CPYRGHT Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00149RO0d400150010-4