DAGGERS AGAINST DIPLOMACY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000400200023-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 14, 1998
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 11, 1959
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000400200023-4.pdf164.04 KB
Body: 
~ FOIAb3b Sanitized - Approved Fo ens CIA-RDP75- ,A994 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD --- APPEND For the reasons suggested above, It Is perhaps desirable to avoid the notion of it subsidy in terms of cash paid out and think In terms of a welfare state. The evidence of .the welfare state are actions by the Government designed to improve the economic position of specific groups' or classes*of the population. AN actions of the Government, in fact, fall incomes and to create agricultural pur- chasing power, thereby improving the market for goods produced by others. There were no important failures. Un- til better programs have been proved, farm price supports have justified their position in the welfare state. They should be reexamined and amended to keep them abreast of the changing facts of the world, but. they should not be ranee of order and tranquility ate all The programs for price supports for costly activities of Government which farm products have, In fact, contributed directly b"neflt the public.- We' think of much more to public welfare than was the welfare state as one which Is Inter- planned in' the original objectives. ested in specific activities for speolije Through distribution programs, hunger t?roups of people, and, sometimes, as in has been largely eliminated in the United the case of graduated taxation, to the States and significant coritributign has economic detriment of other groups. been made to reduction of hunger in oth- The attempts of the Government to er lands. Growing farm efficiency has achieve a leveling off process both. In 'made it possible for a declining number Individual incomes and In human. wel- fare benefits some and penalizes others. The activity of the welfare state includes not only cash paid out to individuals, but als:1 the levying of tariffs, the creation of stockpiles for surplus products either'by the 'Defense Department or In the De- partment of Agriculture, marketing agreements, and the like. Perhaps It is desirable to list some of the specifio ac- tivities which seem to-fall in this cate- gory. At the head of such a list'certainly one finds the graduated income tax Older, of farmers to produce food for an in- creasing domestic population for less total dollars. This is no idle achieve- ment in a nation where inflation is the general .rule. In terms of progress in the solution of basic human wants, it seems quite likely that the farmers of the United States' who produce food have made a greater contribution than any other group in the world during the period beginning in the middle 1930's. however, and more important in its time, . Daggers Against Diplom.cy was the protective tariff. Activities un- der the antitrust laws also fall ih the - SSTENSION OF REMARKS welfare clitegory. Of the more recent devices, the following come quickly to mind: Bank deposit insurance, the eon- HON. BYRON L. JOHNSON servation of natural resources, trans- portation tubsidies, school-lynch pro- grams, Government assistance through charitable. organizations, price-supports OT COLORADO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, February 11, 1959 for farmers, defense stockpiles, alloca- Mr. JCHNSON of Colorado. Mr. tion of defence contracts to job deficit Speaker, the Members of the Congress areas. old-age and survivors pensions, should read with Interest the report minimum-wage laws, job insurance and about* the Central Intelligence Agency separation pay, and ,labor legislation by Charles Edmund. on. formerly a re- giving unusual privileges to unions. , porter for the Fortune magazine, and It Is not the purpose to evaluate these with the Foreign Service, programs. It is only proposed to show their autinuity. on the one hand, and more recently the extent of the activities of the welfare state both in direct sub- sidies and In other programs with similar objectives. Virtually every person In the popula- tion of the United States would seem to be a receiver of benefits, from one or more of these activities. The ett&e nay tion, In one way rr another, is affected by the various programs, whether for industry, for .abor, for the young, for 111e R ed, or for agriculture. It seems iri.poropriate, under it condition where rwtivitie:: of this nature have gained sucii wide acceptance as In the United ;I it es. that the pu'hlic, through its legis l:itois, should withdraw from support of- any croup 'unless that program had failed in It, objective, or an improved program was conceived. Who to the lofted States has the right to. say of nether "You t to h " e o moo This article appeared in the February 1959 Issue of the Progressive magazine: Txs CEN'RAL i'NTEI.LTGENCE AGENCY; DAGGERS AGAINST DI 'i.oMACY (by Charles Edmondson) In tile recent fiaturday Evening Post arti- cle, "The Story B.,hind Quemoy: How We Drifted Close to War," Stewart A1sop tells of the part played by the Central Intelli- geneb Agency In alnirst starting war with Communist China in 11+54 and again In 19.5. For the first time a nos::-circulation publi- cation revealed that beg;ntring early iii 1950 the CIA supported and masterminded "com- mando-type guerrillp i-lds on the fchrnesel mainland, which were sometimes mounted in battalion strength." Aleop does not, of course, tell all of the CIA's activities In heightening tens tons In the Far East. But he does describe in detail the role of "Western Enterprises, Inc." (n cover name for,.the CIA project) in raiding the mainland from Quemoy and the Tachens: "The Western Enterprisers--ostensibly sol- diers of fortune--were responsible for or~ fi ganlzing and equipping the Nationalist guer- iiin program for support of farm rAlas who raided the mainland from the' prices was designed th Improve lridividual, offshore islands. * * * Until early 1954, the incomes in agriculture, It was also de- lelaaps were pretty much their exclusive signed to equalize fitr'm and non-farlp playground, By that fejno they had settled themselves pretty comfortauly on the Islands," Although neither the White House hor Congress had yet made up its mind whether the offshore Islands belonged to Mao Tse- tung or Chiang Kai-shek, the CIA decided the matter for itself and proceeded with systematic raids against the mainland. The results, direct- avid Indirect, were enough to provoke the brink-of-war crisis of September 1954 and October 1958. The Unite..! States and the world were twice taken to the prec- ipioe by a'secret bureau whose sctivitiee are unknown to-Oongresa, the press, and the peo- ple until long ' after the event-it they are ever known. The raids from Quemoy and the Tachens are not Isolated Instances of CIA activity. They are representative. As currently operated, the CIA Is far more than an intetli. gene-gathering organization. It is an activ- let group which steps In boldly to dictate foreign policy in areas not .covered by deci- sions of Congress, the State Department, or $he White House. The CIA operstes clandes- tinelyln every counttl In the world, 113plud- Ing several where the State Departifertt and the pros are forbidden. It executes its proj- sets without concern over. the reaction of the public. The incidents It provokes are never acknowledged, yet can be decisive In shaping-or mieshaptng-publlo opinion, and foreign policy. All the machinery of government pub- licity is used to make CIA-induced incidents serve preconceived domestic ends. The pub- lic can thus be propa*andtzed into believing Whatever the CIA sad its Old Guard allies in the State Department or the military want It to believe. Not long ago *1 asked a distinguished career ambassador, "When CIA operatives. are at work in the country-to which you are accredited don't the incId4ats which they create shape policy ta. such & ,way as to take control largely out rat your hands4" "I couldn't agree with you micro,-, the am- bassador replied. , He told of CIA activities In his country which had' damaged American prestige and Influenctf over a Whole con- tinent. . ' The CIA works under the dtrebtion of the National security Council, the Illation's -.u- Proms body in deciding Military policy. Chairman of the NBC Is the President him- self and there an fifer other members: the Vice President, Secretary or State, Secreta?y of Defense, and. the Director of the Office of Defense MobUItton. The Director of the CIA 14 not a member, but as Its adviser on all intelrigdree Matters be'stts In on most important sessions and has a voice in Se- curity Couhetl disoueslona al,d decisions. According to the basic statute, the CIA's functions are limited to gathering and In- terpreting intelligence. A final catchall clause, however, authorizes-the CIA to per- form such other functions and duties re- lating to security intelligence as the National Security Council nay direct. This would not appear to agthOrise.tpe organization of guerrilla raids ? 4 * in' battalion strength or tht deployment.ot agents provocateurs in the territory of. cold war adversaries. But the CIA has engaged in such activities on a broad scale. Funds' are not lacking for any schemes the CIA may see At to adopt. In his book, "Central Intelligence and NAttvnal Security," Barry Ilowe Ranbcsa, a'geiitidal scientist at Harvard. quotes eatimatee of national in- telligence expendltures as high 88'&2 billion a year., 'Several' hundreds, of millions of dente's atlaually, ? he wrltet; 4nay be budgeted directly t4,the CIA, tith'the mar going to the Army; Air Porce, Navy, State jDapartment, and several ?ther,agenciee which also gather intelligence. Nobody ' knows 'the exact amount the CIA Sets, The Bureau of the Budget I. forbidden b# law to disclose the figure. Congress ltdelt. carefully blindfolded, Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00149R000400200023-4 1J CON 7