(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000400460025-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 8, 1999
Sequence Number: 
25
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000400460025-4.pdf132.32 KB
Body: 
Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-00149R000400460025-4 CPYRGHT CPYRGHT CPYRGHT miring to ecace and a half since the CIA was established to coordinate the work of all governmental units which gather and evaluate information about what is going on all over the world. 'there has never been any controversy. over the claim that there has to be a cer. tain amount of cloak-and-dagger secrecy about such an agency. Few ever ques- tioned the contention that it could not accomplish its task if it had to work in the glare of Congressional revelation. hence, there is acceptance that Con gross as a whole shouldn't even know ,.how much money it is voting to the CIA. The agency's funds are tucked into unex-' plained items in appropriations for other governmental departments. No effort is made by most members of Congress, to find out how many people CIA has around the world. It is accepted by most of them that the agency has more em- ployes and spends more money than does the State Department. `iti.r?ank' 1irrrbassadors? that agents of the CIA, through their secret activities, are more influential in many foreign countries than is the am- bassador from the United States. It lends support. to the charge that the CIA agents have more influence on the formulation of foreign policy than does the State' Department. For years, there has been a demand for the establishment of a "watchdog committee" of Congress to monitor the CIA. A few years ago, such a move was spearheaded by Mike Mansfield, now the Senate majority leader. Like other such efforts, the Mansfield move came to noth- ing. portant voice in formulating foreign poli- cy disturbed many senators when John Foster Dulles was secretary of state and his brother, Allen W. Dulles, was director of the intelligence agency. Unhappiness over the power of the agency reached a peak with.the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Its critics charged that CIA took the direction of foreign affairs out of the hands of two presidents and' with led the nation to the abortive Cuban ven lure . Adverse criticism of the CIA is typified by the title of a book written in 1964 by David Wise and Thomas Ross, "The In- visible Government." Details of the current effort to give plicated as they sound. Actually, there already are three "watchdog" commit.. tees. One is the group, already mentioned, composed of seven senators from the Armed Services Committee and the Ap- propriations Committee. There is a simi- lar eight-nieniber committee in the House of Reprc,,cntativcs. In addition, there is a Citizens Ad- visory Committee of eight members. It Is headed by Clark Clifford, who, ever since he was Harry S. Truman's White House counsel, has been flitting between a prosperous Washington law practice and chores for whomever happens to be president. The current proposal which has stirred up all the bitterness is sponsored by Min- nesota's McCarthy. It proposes that the current Senate watchdog committee be revamped to give membership to three senators from the Foreign Relations Com- iittee, three from the Armed Services ommitt.ee and three from the Appropri- tions Committee. McCarthy and his supporters won the` irst round of their fight. They got the Foreign Relations Committee to approve he proposal by a vote. of 14 to 5. The next and more perilous stage would be when and if, the Senate gets a chance to act on it. The first danger facing the proposal is that Sen. Russell will move to send the neasure to the Armed Services Commit- cc, of which he is chairman. The argu- ent for such a referral is that because he legislation creating ,the CIA, along ith the Defense Department, was han- led by the Armed Services Committee, 11 matters affecting, it must also go to med Services. ..t I Should the measure go to Russell's mmittee, it wilt receive 'A,-prompt CPYRGHT irlal. If the Senate votes- with McCarthy td Fuibright in refusing to send the bill Armed Services, there still is the prob-.. in of getting the Democratic Policy, In that connection, it.t 'worth noting-. at one of the 14 members of the For.', gn Relations Committee who voted toy ring out the measure was Majority'. Bader Mansfield. Another was Russell iana senator Is classified among the 't Charge Frain Lays n. putting f their own committee on the watchdog roup have been associated with the awks. They were Democrats Frank J. ausche of Ohio and Stuart Symington ra ourke B. Hickenloopcr of -Iowa, Frank arlson of Kansas and Karl E. Mundt of Lausche backed up hie vote with an. ssertion.-on the Senate finnr that while t ess to;leak vital-data. Her 'name' has been used. to support per- he contention that Sen. Russell has around' 16 ' discriminate PYRG; IT Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP75-001498000400460025-4