'LISTEN YANKEE' REVISITED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 6, 2004
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 19, 1963
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0.pdf680.51 KB
Body: 
JAN 91963 Approved For Release 2004/02/10: CIA-RDP75-00 BOOKS AND THE 1L "Listen Yankee" Revisited by Samuel Shapiro "My loyalties are conditional upon my own convictions and my own values.... Both of these lie more with the Cuban revolution than with the official United States reaction to it. The policies the United States has pursued and is pursuing against Cuba are based upon a profound ig- norance, and are shot through with hysteria. I believe that if they are continued they will result in more disgrace and more disaster for the image of my country before Cuba, before Latin America, and before the world." - C. Wright Mills, Listen Yankee (1g6o) Despite his successful academic career, C. Wright Mills did not fit the conven- tional pattern of a professor of sociol- ogy at a major American university. For one thing, his work was always intense- ly committed and personal; he shied away from foundation grants and asso- ciation with research organizations that turn out studies of public opinion, mar- keting research, and similar directly use- ful subjects. For another, he was not content to mark out a small area within his discipline and spend his life map- ping its boundaries and filling in de- tails. And, finally, he never accepted the pleasing image of a righteous, prosper- ous, and conflict-free America that was a product of full employment in the academic profession during the 1950's. Instead, as the years went by and the Cold War continued, Mills grew more irreverent, more alienated, and more critical of the faults he saw in Ameri- can society. Mills' boldness, his concern for big problems and pivotal situations, and his willingness to take intellectual risks are all evident in Listen Yankee, the shortest and next to last of the eleven books he wrote or edited. As his critics were quick to point out, he lacked most of the usual qualifications requisite for op -A-I~ z'f writing about the Cuban revolution. He had visited Latin America only briefly, in 1959 and 1g6o, knew little about the area's history or social structure, and had never visited Cuba before his brief tour in the summer of 1g6o. He did not speak Spanish, and allowed himself to be guided about the island by partisans of the revolution; he did not interview or obtain information from any gua- jiros (peasants) or workers, from op- ponents of Fidel, or from members of the PSP (Communist) hierarchy who were rising to key posts at the time of his arrival in Havana. Listen Yankee, therefore, was not a cool and careful sociological study, but a polemic along the lines of Common Sense or J'accuse, an unusual and pas- sionate statement to have come from an academician. Despite Mills' explanation that for the most part he was serving only as a spokesman for the revolution- aries, for "the hungry nation bloc [as] a voice that must be heard" by, the American public, his book was pretty generally dismissed as a piece of fidelis- ta propaganda: "Mills is dishing out ... the official Castro line; and ... he expounds it with a mixture of bluster, revolu- tionary rhetoric, and downright falsehood which could not be im- proved on by Fidel himself"- Charles Rolo, The Atlantic, Febru- ary, 1961. "The book is . . . naive in the ex- treme . . . or . . . purposefully de- signed to create a false impression about the . . . current situation in Cuba." - Kevin Corrigan, Catholic World, March, 1961. "Tedious and repetitious, the book reads like translations of Castro's in- terminable and paranoiac brain- washing tirades against the United tortions and untruths ... that have been printed in the Communist Par- ty press for more than twenty-five years.... With absolutely no at- tempt at objectivity, Mills parrots these absurd accusations." - Jules Dubois, The Saturday Review, De- cember 17, 1g6o. When Harper's published a chapter (December, 1g6o), its editors were care- ful to label it "a piece of propaganda - uncritical, emotional, oblivious of the faults of the Castro regime." Even pe- riodicals like Dissent and Encounter were hostile to the argument of Listen Yankee; as Mills put it, in the last letter he wrote to me, "I expected to be beat on the head by the mass media, but I did not expect that the entire intelli- gentsia of this country would reveal so fully their moral cowardice." Reading the book over again today, with the perspective derived from two more years' development of the Cuban revolution, it is possible to see that Mills was sometimes led astray by his informants, or at least did repeat in- accurate things which they told him. Since his book had such an extraordi- nary circulation (hundreds of thou- sands of copies in this country, ioo,ooo more in four editions in an authorized translation issued in Mexico, and at least one counterfeit edition published in Peru - all most unusual for a serious book about Latin America), it is worth pointing out some of the errors of fact which Mills did not correct or criticize: Listen, Yankee: The middle classes "failed complete- ly to do anything real about the Batista tyranny." Comment: This is unfair to the thousands of middle-class Cubans who risked their lives in clandestine work in the cities, to such middle-class martyrs as Jose Antonio Echevarria, who led the attack on the Presidential Palace in 1957, to the 170 middle-class youths who took STAT STAT STAT Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0 part in the assault on the Moncada bar- racks. Castro himself is of middle-class origin, the son of a well-to-do Oriente landlord, married for a -ime to the sister of a Batista official. 'What. did you [Yankoes] do - about the weapons, for example, the Yan- kee Government kept sending. .. to Batista? US arms shipments tc, Cuba, totaling less than $ii million botween 1945 and 1958, were doubtless an error. But these shipments were halted in March, 1958. Medical doctors are with and for the revolution. The Cuban Emergency Relief Center in lv[iami estimates that 1,300 of Cuba's 5,000 MD's had left tae island by the end of 1961, and more continue to ar- rive in Miami every week. "We are already [August, 1960] be- yond the point where [American economic pressure] c Auld hurt us in any real way." On my most recent %isit to Cuba, in August, 1962, the loss of $600 million in imports from the US was painfully apparent; there were severe shortages of food and every kind of consumer goods. It is not at all clear if a viable economy can be built up relying on Approved For Release 200ffE 2f J 8fAuf 75-00149R000500250012-0 markets and sources of supply that are 10,000 miles away.. The Soviet countries are buying su- gar. And that is because theit? stand- ard of living is increasing. There is thus a rational economic relation be- tween These Soviet countries and countries such as Cuba. . . . The greater,gemand in the world market will increase the price of sugar. Ernesto Guevara himself has pointed out that the USSR produces enough (beet) sugar of its own, and that it would be cheaper for the Russians to increaseproduction at home rather than rely on Cuba's antiquated and ineffi- cient industry. And despite a disastrous 1962 Cuban crop of only 4.8 million tons (which was exceeded as far back as 1925), the world price of sugar has been hovering at about 3 cents a pound all year. Ours is the first agrarian reform in the world which began right away with an increased production.... For the first time in the history of Cuba, the rural population is going to have plenty of good clean chicken to eat at a price they can afford.... By De- cember, 1960, we figure we'l have about do (state) farms, producing some 6 million chickens a month; in 1961, we'll double that. ,!another Dream Song INRA's figures, like those issued by the Chinese during their Great Leap Forward, arequite unreliable. There has been some increase in production of food in items like rice and beans. But the agrarian reform has so far been un- able to make up for the $i8o million in food normally imported from the US. Rice, beans, fish, eggs, meat, milk, but- ter, and most other foods are tightly rationed. As for chickens, Cubans are entitled to only one a month, and don't always get it. Castro's most recent statement its that Cuba is producing only 2 million chickens a month, "and will double that in 1963." -Speech to the Federation of Cuban Women, El Mundo, October 3, .L962. "Next year -1961-- we are going to have a ore million ton steel plant." No such plant is cur:rently in operation, or even under construction. Even Pro- fessor J. P. Morray, an enthusiastic de- fender of the regime, estimates that steel production will be only 250,000 tons in 1965. - "Cuba and Commu- nism," Monthly Review, July-August 1961. Our Prime Minister went to Wash- ington right after the insurrection, but he was just given the cold shoul- der, and certainly no help. Even his request for quite minor financial con- sideration was turned down flat. This bit of fidelista mythology has been refuted by Felipe Pazos, Castro's first National Bank President, and by Rufo Lopez Fresquet, his Minister of Finance. They accompanied Fidel to the US in 1959, and have reported their surprise and disappointment: when he specifi- cally ordered them not to ask for Amer- ican help. - Daniel James, Cuba: The First Soviet Satellite in the Americas (New York, 1961) Filling her com ,act and delicious body with chicken p?iprika, she glanced at me twice. Fainting with i:iterest, I hungered back and only the fact ofher husband and four other people kept me from springing on her or falling at he.- little feet and crying "You are the h attest one for years of night Henry's dazed .!yes have enjoyed, Brilliance." I advanced upon (despairing) m:rspumoni. - Sir Bones: is stuffed, de world, wif reeding girls. - Black hair, cc mplexion latin, jewelled eyes downcast ... The slob beside her feasts ... What wonders is she sitting on, over there? The restaurant buzzes. She might as well be on Mars. Where did-it all go wrong? There ought to be a law against Henry. - Mr. Bones: there is. JOHN BERRYMAN We Cuban revolutionaries of the 26th of July Movement are much more advanced than the Communist Party ever was or is today.... We are using them rather than the re- verse.... The Communists as a po- litical party have very little impor- tance in Cuba. Even in the summer of 1960, when Mills visited Cuba, PSP (Communist) influence was considerable and grow- ing. By 1962, INRA, Havana Univer- sity, the trade union federation (CTC- Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0 Approved For Release 20d4ffiu1`/tb ~itIA41k1JP75-00149R000500250012-0 the largest newspaper were all headed the only legal political party, and The basic argument of Listen Yankee, however, like the Cuban revolution it- self, cannot be dismissed so easily. De- spite errors of fact that were doubtless inevitable in a book produced in such haste, Mills also noted down a great many truths about the revolution, truths which the American people and their leaders have not been able to bring themselves to recognize even yet. On re-reading the book in Cuba during the summer of 1962, I was surprised to see that much of what Mills wrote still seemed applicable, even after two years of continuing cataclysmic change. To compensate for the brevity of Mills' Latin American experience, he had the advantages of a gifted observer's eye, an understanding of the process of so- cial change, a familiarity with radical thought, and a sympathetic sociological imagination to help him interpret the revolution. He made many errors, but on a number of crucial issues he was right, and far more experienced Latin American scholars and journalists wrong; and it is important for us to understand why. To begin with, Mills made the most of the weeks he spent in Cuba. Before ar- riving in Havana he read everything he could on the island's recent history, in- cluding US Commerce Department re- ports on sugar and the International Bank for Reconstruction's surveys of the economy. While his contacts were limited to middle-class intellectuals, he did travel from one end of the island to the other, and interviewed many of the men who are still running the re- volution: President Osvaldo Dorticos, Education Minister Armando Hart, Ernesto Guevara, then head of the Na- tional Bank and now Minister of In- dustry, Carlos Franqui, editor of Revo- lucidn, Major Rene Vallejo, INRA chief of Oriente province, and others. And he knew how to make the most of these meetings. Robert Taber, himself an ex- perienced reporter formerly with NBC, wrote me last July that Mills ". . . was the most thorough, pene- trating, and all-round best inter- viewer I've ever seen, including any journalist you'd care to mention, and most psychiatrists.... When he got through, subject and he were both wrung dry, he because of remark- ably intense concentration, watching subject like a hawk for every ex- pression. In the end he knew a more about the subject than the sub ject did, of that I'm sure. It was a pleasure and wonder to watch him work." by "old militants," and the Union of Young Communists (UJC) had clearly become the road to future influence. "We Cubans' aren't afraid of any idea; so we are going to be really free.... We believe that minorities should have the means of expressing their opinions." Cuban newspapers, the university, the schools, the publishing business, and all the organs of intellectual life are anything but "really free" at the pres- ent time. Mills' informant could argue that it is American pressure that has led to the clamping-down on free dis- cussion. Listen Yankee says nothing about Cas- tro's promise to restore the -1940 con- stitution, his pledge of "genuine rep- resentative government" and "truly honest elections," his guarantee of "just compensation of expropriated owners" of land to be turned over to small holders. Theodore Draper, Castro's ablest American critic, has shown quite clearly (in Castro's Revolution: Myths and Realities) that el lider ma'ximo promised one kind of revolution, and delivered quite another. Listen Yankee might seem, therefore, to have only the limited value of telling us what Cuban revolutionaries were thinking and saying in the summer of i96o. Even Draper admits that it is a "peculiarly useful and exasperating work" on this score, so faithful a record that he was able to guess at the names of many of Mills' informants. "Catching superbly the color, flavor, and intensity of the revolutionary thinking and emotion, [Mills] has presented with fine accuracy what Castro and his friends think and what makes them act the way they have been acting toward the United States.... The author has been emi- nently successful in putting across this 'voice of the Cuban revolu- tion'." - Tad Szulc in The New York Times, December 4, -1g6o. But if the book were no more than an honest and intelligent piece of journal- ism, it could be regarded as only an interesting but unimportant footnote to Mills' scholarly career. Putting together what he was told and what he saw, Mills concluded that the revolution had accomplished many needed reforms, that it was popular with a majority of the Cuban people, and that it was permanent, i.e., could not be destroyed by outside pressures. In view of the subsequent unsuccessful invasion of the island by aacked group of Cuban exiles, it is clear that President K?enneedy. would have done well to listen t.9 CJs, Jnormants: "Your government is dreaming of some kind of indirect military action, secretly supported mercenaries and Batista henchmen; something like they did in Guatemala a while back. . But the ending isn't going to be the same, we can assure you of that. It won't work again.... We will not flee the country as Batista did. We are determined to fight to the end. Any one who is here in Cuba for just a little while sees clearly that this is just a fact." This was in print while American news- papers prated about Castro's "hysteri- cal" talk of an invasion, and even be- fore Professor Ronald Hilton of Stan- ford University revealed the existence of an American base at Retalhuleu in Guatemala. On the (,gr.... nva- sion and its, probable failure,.,MjI1 w s c P -4 and the mass media, the joint Chiefs of Staff, and the President of the United States_=e ~noott.2lenty of Latin American experts, wi~`th vastly more knowledge of Cuban affairs than Mills, insisted, and still in- sist, that Castro can be overthrown and the old pattern of American domination of the island resumed. "I have the feeling that economic pressures will make Fidel Castro un- popular in the long run.... When things hit bottom, the United States will lend $500 million to a new Cu- ban Government on the pledge that the confiscated properties will be returned or the former owners in- demnified. American capital will re- enter Cuba." - Daniel M. Frieden- Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0 Approved For Release 2004)OW f'GEv4C gROP75-00149R000500250012-0 berg;, "History Wi I Not Absolve Castro," The New Republic, October 10, i.96o. "To remain in power, Castro will have to massacre m Est of the coun- try's 6.5 million peo ,le." - Jules Du- bois, The Pontiac Press, November 11, 1961. People who write tr is way, as Mills pointed out, simply CO not understand revolutions. We can, as Senator Engle of California has engagingly suggested, "take the top six feet off of all of Cuba with one air strike, and all that's built on it, and all that lire on it." But we cannot reverse a soc al revolution and restore the old order of things in Cuba. Another theme of L'sten Yankee was Mills' insistence on Castro's humani- tarian goals and achievements. On my own visits to the island in 1g6o, 1960- 61, and 1962, I sari continuing evi- dence of concern for the immediate wel- fare and future well-being of what had formerly been the despised lower classes. Indeed, the Communist techni- cians from Eastern Europe I interviewed in Cuba usually criticized the regime because it was too easy-going, too con- sumption-oriented, too committed to such "impractical" projects as housing, hotels, and tourism - "not enough work and too much cha-cha-cha." No one can deny that the press in Cuba today is muzzled, that the trade unions z.re becoming organs of the state for enforcing production goals, and that grave injustices have been and are being committed by a small group of men with absolute power. Nevertheless, the positive social accomplishments of the past four years have won continu- ing support for Castro from what I be- lieve is still a substantial majority of the Cuban people. It would be easy but meaningless to present testimony to that effect by such uncritical eulogists of the regime as Leo Hubermman, Paul Sweezevr, and Professor Morray. But consider the following observations, all of them supporting Mills' view, and all of them written by men whose attitude toward Castro ranges from mildly criti- cal to bitterly hostile: the program turns out in practice;-.,_ there is no getting around the fact that for the poor, illiterate, landless, outcast guajiros, the cooperatives represent a jump of centuries in liv- ing standards. They also represent a vast increase of constructive activity in the rural areas that were formerly the most backward and stagnant part of Cuba.... For the first time in Cuban history a leader has given [the peasants] a sense of human dig- nity and political importance, and they have paid him back by revering him." - Theodore Draper, "The Runaway Revolution," The Report- er, May 12, 1960. "I'm one hundred percent better. Be- fore, there was not work. Now there's work all year. Now we are eating - rice, eggs, beans.... If this is Communism, let it come." - An unidentified cooperative farmer in Pinar del Rio, quoted in Time, June 20, 1960. "Seven thousand new school class- rooms have been completed this year.... Uncounted millions have been spent on the building of public beaches and tourist facilities - a pet project of Dr. Castro-leading even some of the Premier's most devoted followers to wonder about his sys- tem of revolutionary priorities."- Tad Szulc, The New York Times, August 3, 1g6o. "No less than 86 percent of our sample did approve of the present situation in Cuba and ... one half of these ... revealed themselves as really fervent supporters of the pres- ent government.... We feel reason- ably confident in predicting that, had a national election been held at the time of our survey, Fidel Castro would have won by overwhelming odds." - Lloyd A. Free, Attitudes of the Cuban People Toward the Cas- tro Regime (Princeton, 1961). "The story of the transformation of Cuba from a friendly ally to a Com- munist base is - in large measure - the story of a government in Wash- ington which lacked the imagination and compassion to understand the needs of the Cuban people." - Sen- ator John F. Kennedy, in a speech of October 6, ig6o, reprinted in In- 196o "No matter what one may think of the theory behind Cuba's ",and-re- form program and no matter how Enrico's Brother Enrico's brother married a strange lady, the Earth, no other bride he needed; she labored, brought fcrth fine sapling children; he laughed at times and offered firm red apples to his friends: "My grandchild this," he'd say, "this saucy redhead; or this blond fellow with the pointed head," pointing a pear. Enrico's bi other's heart tired suddenly one sunny morning as he was sawing for his winter reading. They gave him a harp. He had never favored the harp and played it awkwardly. They taught him songs and this v% as more to his liking. He was maker of songs in his Earth-love days. But after it million years of tingling the harp and singing and singing the songs and watcF ing the myriad myriad newcomers come, Enrico's b ?other sought and asked the officials: "How are my children in that lovely place?" The officials were friendly enough, they studied the charts; at last and slowly they turned their haloed heads and spoke as one: "It seems to be gone," they said. JOHN RUSSELL MCCARTHY Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA=RDP75-00149R000500250012-0 Approved For Release R(2QA4/g2/1J, :1c,-RDf75-00149R000500250012-0 ter-American Economics Affairs, Journey to Cuba," Dissent, Summer, Winter, 196x. 1961. 1961 "The agrarian reform program, the heart of the original revolution, is, to use the most reticent adjective, a splendid piece of work ... undoubt- edly a success in the improvement of people as well as of statistics.... What is most impressive ... is the change made by the revolution in people's attitude to life." - "Cuba in Mid-Revolution," The Economist (London), January 7, x961. "The Fidelist government does have achievements to point to. In the course of a short two years it has built thousands of first-rate schools; it has led an intense (and remark- ably successful) campaign to eradi- cate illiteracy; it has constructed rural settlements which, for the first time, offer modern, sane and even comfortable housing to a growing number of its coo perativistas.... A strong majority of the rural popula- tion still seems willing to follow Castro's lead." - F. R. Alleman, Fo- rum Service, February 11, 1961. "Castro and Guevara are literally adored ... by the large number of poor and humiliated Cubans, especi- ally the Negroes. They see these two leaders as saintly and honorable men, dedicated to removing injus- tices and discrimination, to which the Cuban Negroes had been sub- jected." - Joseph Newman, The New York Herald Tribune, March 23, 1961. "If Castro has enough time and money to create a higher standard of living among the peasants as a re- sult of this truly revolutionary [land reform program] he will go down in Cuban history as a greater patriot than Jose Marti.... Not merely for propaganda purposes . . . but be- cause it is deeply and sincerely be- lieved, the Cuban regime emphasizes that justice and dignity are for the poor and small and colored as well as the rich and big and white.... Al- most all the peasants still support Castro, as do the very poor and the Negroes in the city population. The intellectuals are without doubt in his camp." - Daniel M. Friedenberg, "A "The concrete cubes of peasant houses, with electricity and running water, are replacing the former squalor of palm leaf thatched huts. ... Living standards are rising and unemployment is dwindling." - Tad Szulc, The New York Times, June 25, 1961. 1962 "The explanations offered for Cas- tro's failure to hold elections are on the whole reasonable. The Revolu- tion has been unquestionably popu- lar with a large majority of the Cu- ban people, and few revolutionary governments ... have held elections until considerable time elapsed after they came to power." - Dennis H. Wrong, "The American Left and Cuba," Commentary, February,1962. "Though greatly diminished, the re- servoir of idealism and expectancy that Castro began with still exists among many campesinos." - Time, April 27, 1962. "Cubans partial to the revolution ... take pride in modern housing de- velopments that have sprung up, mainly on palm-dotted fields but also around several cities. In Ha- vana ... they will point at the East Havana suburb, with its up-to-date apartment buildings etched on the bright horizon. Rolling through the countryside, one sees acres of small concrete-and-brick homes, designed to replace miserable huts," - AP dis- patches printed in The New York Times, June =o and June 13, 1962. "The eradication of prostitution and gambling (much of it controlled by US gangsters), the quick social re- forms - these made a deep impres- sion on all those in Latin America who had been hoping for progress in their own countries.... Castroism still represents a formidable rallying point for Latin America's destitute masses." - George N. Fenin, "De- mocracy's Last Chance in Latin America," The Saturday Review, August 18, 1962. "Low cost modern housing, replac- ing wretched slums, has benefited N ACCOMMODATION FROM I THE NEW REPUBLIC Briefly: you may purchase any book recently reviewed in The New Republic for 20 percent less than its retail price. Some of these books are listed in the coupon (below) with the bookstore prices and the lower rates to which you are entitled as a reader of The New Republic. Your check must accompany the order. (We cannot bill you, be- cause the bookkeeping and cler- ical costs would be prohibitive.) You may order direct from us, as shown below. Mail to ----------------- THE NEW REPUBLIC shipping department 1244 19th Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. Please send me a copy of each book I have checked off below. ^ Lessing: The Golden Notebook (retail price - $5.95) PRICE: $4.76 ^ Biddle: In Brief Authority (retail price-$5.95) PRICE: $4.76 ^ Powers: Morte D'Urban - (retail price - $4.95) PRICE: $3.96 Sitwell: The Queens & the Hive (retail price - $7.50) PRICE: $6 ^ Purdy: Children Is All - (retail price - $4.25) PRICE: $3.40 ^ White: The Points of My Compass (retail price - $4.00) PRICE: $3.20 TOTAL: * * My check for this amount is en- closed. Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0 Approved For Release 2004/012110.1-E6iIltt r75-00149R000500250012-0 But the United States, Mills argued, could only exacerbate the problem and drive Fidel to tyranny by continuing its hostile attitude toward his regime. Re- peated statements by American officials that "Communism in'this hemisphere is not negotiable" (Adlai Stevenson), and that "we do not recognize the Cas- tro regime in Cuba, and never will" (Douglas Dillon), are fine for home consumption, but hardly the basis for a viable Caribbean policy. With the Al- liance for Progress so far an admitted failure, fidelismo is still what Mills said it was," a major alternative to . . . misery elsewhere in Latin America." The intellectuals in President Ken- nedy's entourage have tried to brush aside Mills' assertion (in The Power Elite and The Causes of World War III) that a small group of men with vested interests controlled American domestic and foreign policy, and that they based their rule on "violence and . . . inept opportunism." But it remains for them to explain why the Cuban policy pur- sued during the last two years of the Eisenhower Administration and the first two years of the New `Frontier fell into such a monolithic pattern. Eisenhower cut off the Cuban sugar quota; Ken- nedy shut off the last trickle of trade. Eisenhower broke relations; Kennedy kept our embassy in Havana shut. is- enhower authorized the training or 'a banes ~~f anti-C:astro xeugees by the CIA; Kennedy sent them ashore in the y of Pigs. The faces (except for the ever-present head of the FBI) change. Eisenhower, the Dulles brothers, and Sherman Adams are yre laced by the Kennedys, McCone,rt ur Schlesing- er, Jr. and fc(jeorge Bundy. Buts our Cuban,ains the, same. This wou'Yd" be understandable, perhaps, if that policy were successful, But our hostility has so far succeeded only in driving Fidel further' into the Soviet camp; his first official announcement that his was a. "Socialist" revolution came immediately after our tragi-comic invasion of April, .:196-1. As Mills warned, State Department ,a . ! :? - icyma;ershaveght a out what they most feared - the intrusion of Russian Communism in the tsar bti an. y , -- it rI~ : , .n. MIT ls` asic conclusions about astro, then, have not yet been proved wrong. He felt also that the inadequate Amer- ican reaction to fidelismno was sympto- matic, that "on the shores of Cuba the whole international posture of th thousands of Cuba--k families. So has the health program. Clinics have been established throughout the countryside, and medicine has reached some remote areas for the first time.... Giant strides have also been made in education.... More Cubans are eating; more regularly than was true in pr,!-Castro days. No report on Cuba pretending to a rea- sonable degree of objectivity can avoid the judgment that Castro's re- gime has achieved significant gains for its people in tl.e realm of social service." - Donald Grant, "Castro's Cuba Today," "'he Progressive, September, 1962. These reports, and others like them, should not of cour;e lead us to any blanket endorsement of a totalitarian regime; similar stories regularly came out of Mussolini's :Italy, Stalin's Rus- sia, and Hitler's Germany. Castro's dic- tatorship could become a brutal tyran- ny. Mills himself was aware of this, and frank in expressing his fears: "I do not like such dependence upon one man as exists in Cuba to- day', nor the virtually absolute pow- er that this One mi.n possesses .... Any moment of such military and economic truth might become an epoch of political and cultural lies. It might harden into any one of sev- eral kinds of dicta orial tyranny." ~,jb the author of numer- c ous S ? r tV - t l s pit pol- io i;n Latin ,fume, cz, hqA_ us IOU,, his l assistant pro f essor of Amer- ican history at , ' l! an State Univer- ,y, The Detroit free Press charges that the issue of academic freedom was raised by his disco ssal, and students have set up a committee for his rein- statement. Dr. 51 apiro's article is drawn from a f wt 9 in$,.vo_lu,me: The New Sociology : Essays on Social Theory and Social Values ",Honor of C,~?tjvlills, edited by Irving L. Horowitz, John Be?ryman, a member of the English faculty at Brown Univer- sity, has published several books of poems. John Russel. McCarthy, a Cali- fornia poet, makes his first New Re- public appearance with this issue. United States of America has . . . col- lapsed in utter failure." Even before Kennedy's election Mills predicted the attempted invasion, the unsuccessful Alianza, and the inability of the new Administration to deviate in any essen- tial way from the policies of the old in Latin America: "You're coming up against the economic and political struc- ture of the United. States." Re-read in this light, Listen Yankee fits into Mills' thought as a significant part of its structure. Here, he believed, was a possible escape from the sterile formulas of the past, from the warfare between impotent: liberalism and vul- garized ;Marxism. The Cuban revolu- tion, he thought, was a new and inde- pendent movement, with a great deal of prom'se in opening a new road to socialism., one free of the dogmatism and sectarianism of orthodox Commu- ist movements elsewhere. During the last year of his life he hoped to return to Cuba to see how the revolution was progressng, and perhaps to begin a broadly based study of what he re- garded as one of the most promising social experiments of the ig6o's. And it was fitting that his last book, devoted to a consideration of the varieties of Marxism, should have concluded with Ernesto Guevara's "Notes for the Study of the Ideology of the Cuban Revolu- tion." f can similarly end with some of the advice that Mills hoped we would listen to before it was too late: "No matter what you believe about Communism, there is only one way you can counter it. You must begin really to compete with that influence in positive, constructive ways. And that can only mean in technical and cultural and economic and political ways. If you really tried, perhaps you might win . . . . Cuba is your big chance. It's your chance to estab- lish once again what the United States perhaps did once mean to the world. It's your chance to make it clear how you're going to respond to all the chaos and tumult and glory, all the revolution and bloody mess and enormous hopes that are coming about among aP.l the impoverished, disease-ridden, illiterate, hungry peo- ples o:F the world in which you, Yankee, are getting so fat an drowsy." Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000500250012-0