ONASSIS OIL TANKERS BOYCOTTED; SAUDI ARABIAN CONTRACT SCORED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000600090068-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 17, 1999
Sequence Number: 
68
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 21, 1955
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000600090068-6.pdf102.28 KB
Body: 
NEW YORK TIAM JAN 2 1 1955 Approved For Release 2000/05/24: CIA-RDP75-00149 1Onassis' Oil Tankers Boycotted; baud i ra tan 'on race Scored fto 01 _... , Move by Major Compgnles Is Viewed as First Phase of Strategy to Destroy His Fleet Unless Pact Is Modified CAIRO, Jan. 20-Major oil compnaies have begun a boycott against the oil tanker fleet of ,Aristotle Onassis, Greek-born Ar- 1 gentine shipping magnate. They hope to force the modification of !his allegedly monopolistic oil shipping contract with the Saudi Arabian government. The boycott as described by oil circles here today is the first phase of a worldwide strategy to destroy Mr. Onassis' tanker em- pire unless the contract is modi- fied to the satisfaction of major oil interests. The projected cam- paign against Mr. Onassis Is re- ported to have the tacit endorse- ment of the United States Gov- ernment. Under the terms of the agree- ment concluded at Jiddah a year a.go today, Mr. Onassis is to ere- late a private company called the Saudi Arabian Maritime Cow- pany limited with a minimum registry of 500,000 tons of tank- ers.under the Saudi Arabian flag. Saudi Arabia is bound to compel all oil shipments from the coun- try to be carried in Saudi Arabi- ~.n Maritime Company ships with the exception of - the Arabian American Oil Company. Aranico is permitted to give preference to such of its own tankers as were carrying Saudi Arabian petroleum before Dec. 31, 1953. Transport Rates Set Transport rates, according to the agreement, "shall be in accordance with the price an- nounced monthly by the London tankers panel," but not less than the average rate, of the panel over two years ended March 19, 1954; Mr. Onassis is to pay" tax to the Saudi Arabian government of 11/2 shillings sterling (21 cents) on e.jch ton of oil shipped. The agreement was 'protested by both the State Department alid Aramco, which holds a vast sixty-six-year Saudi Arabian oil concession dating from 1933. United States officials say if the agreement is maintained there is nothing to prevent simi- lar agreements in other oil-pro- { ducing countries from creating monopolies that would squeeze the American maritime Industry from the ,shipment of American- !produced oil in vital world areas. '.Further consideration is that U,nited States tanker fleets would ultimately bee reduced against na- tional strategic interests. Aramco, whose parent.compa- vies are Standard of New Jer-' sey, Socony, Standard of Califor- nia nia and the Texas Company, charged the Onassis agreement contravened Its concession, which stipulates the oil it produces shall be sold and transported on a com- petitive basis If the agreement is enforced, company spokesmen said, Mr. Onassis would eventually obtain. complete monopoly on Saudi Ara- bian oil transport as Aramco tankers, limited to those in traf-, fic before December 31, 1953, be- came obsolete. Such a situation,, called "flag discrimination," is opposed by the oil- interests and! the United States and British! Governments as well as other in- ternational. maritime Interests. King Saud Set Deadline King Saud is reportedly much embarrassed by the reaction to his agreement with Mr. Onassis, which produced such manifesta- tions as the widely publicized i charges of corruption made by Mr. Onassis' brother-in-law and shipping rival Stavros Niarchos. Early last month King Saud requested Aramco and Mr, Ona.s-j sis to try to settle their differ-~ ences by a deadline of Jan, 1.5 after which he said the disputeI must go to arbitration. Arbitration is now in prepara- tion here technically between Aramco and Saudi Arabia and the issue is whether or not thel Onassis agreement contravenes+ Aramco's concession. Mr. Onassis, arrived here yesterday as a very much interested party although not technically a disputant, . Mr. Onassis has conferred with! top executives of Arameo and; parent companies in New York, the Hague, Dharan and Jiddah. Facing a.formidable array of oil; company power, he reportedly) has elcpressed the willingness to drop the restrictive clause against' Aramco ships in return for a guaranteed minimum oil tonnage for his ships with?the additional, proposal that Aramco use his ships under long-term charters.' 'Aramco, which produced about 42,000,000 tons of oil last year, and shipped 40 per cent of it, re-; jected the demands as excessive.! Aramco paid King Saud about $220,9 000 in royalties last year. . ifr.Onassis estimates King Saud's taxes on the proposed Saudi Ara- bian Maritime Company ship- ments would net him an addi tional $5,000,000. CPYRGHT Approved For Release 2000/05/24: CIA-RDP75-00149R000600090068-6