SPY STORY: OUR MAN IN THE KREMLIN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000600250058-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 18, 2000
Sequence Number: 
58
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 2, 1965
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000600250058-9.pdf106.32 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 200 / /26!,:' 9N' R' 6 5-00149R000600250058-9 ROGERS REPORTS: Spy !tar by WARREN T'"ASHINGTON: From time to time we learn that side, iLis.just abad, if not worse, on the other side. one of the latest reminders is the case of Oleg Pen- kovsky, currerttly being highly publicized. PenkoYSliY was a Soviet colonel, a much-deco- rated war hero, a higp,-ranking intelligence officer, an i`tsidcr in Russia's missile program, n, anti- mate of 'generals and m shals- in short, seemingly an u egated success in the Soviet UniO i hier- He even married * b'oss's archy . slaughter-that Is, the daugliter of a general-and. thereafter quickly trc.anie; in iii'-'own words, 'one of t lw privilege But in 1963 he was arrested, t:rtod, convicted and executed as a ROGERS for the United States and Britain. By his own admission, in a remarkable auto- biography which he somehow managed to write, he was the West's man in the Kremlin-"Henceforth I am your soldier, pledged to carry out everything which Is entrusted to me." The revelatigns in his "The Penkovsky Papers," being published this month in the United States, sent tremors through the intelligence _ can1miW y, here and inthe two other capitals'directlyy affected. 7P111zlicly, there will be no comment, as is traditional with operators in the never-never land of sE'Jw1aPx. 1=3w, privately, the sources involved hrs. c iicr r authentiei.tY, in. so f:ai as t,hr cdata Ieiit ii.,elf to t sh vkin ;, ROGERS Penkovs y represents disgusted with the Soviet system and with its poli- tics. On our side, this is the kind of talk we are used to hearing from Americans who take to the streets with banners protesting in favor of civil equality or against policies in Viet Nam. Yet it is astonishing when a man of such stature goes round the bend and into the chasm of treason. Perhaps this says something for our tolerance of these irksome demon-' strations as a safety valve. From the West's point of view, his timing was just about eH1 perhaps the worst months of 1961 and 1962, years of the cold war. That .was when Khrushchev built the Berlin Wall, resumed nuclear testing and threat- ened the world with nuclear war by sending missiles, into Cuba,. There was no more fortuitious time for; he United States and Britain to have a pipeline into the,'Kreniliii, providing up-to-the-minute data. on Soviet troop dispositions, nuclear capability and` missile- strength. We know now why Secretary of Defense McNa- mara was able to talk so knowledgeably about such matters. He. had it cold, straight *qm Penkovsky. In great measure, this takes"ueh of the sting out of the atomic "leaks," typified by the celebrated Nunn-May and Fuchs defections, which have so embittered the West. On the ourface at least, it would. seen we got the best of the nasty bargain. Ever r, the Soviets have been revising, reshuf- 1,1in7, Wig and hiring throughout their intelligence or;'anizati on, Beyond that; the incident demonstrates cocr more how heavily the unscheduled and unexpected fi;ure in the deadly game of intelligence. Both the United States and the Soviet Union, .4s the 'leaden of i.wo systems in conflict, spend billions of dollar. ud risk untold lives trying to ferret out the other secrets. In the end, one individual with his nose out of joint, for reasons of his own, hands them ovo.r on a platter. Our Man in the Kremlin Approved For Release 2001/07/26 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000600250058-9