POWER CALLS PLANS FOR SAC NOT ADEQUATE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000600380004-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 16, 1999
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000600380004-4.pdf152.95 KB
Body: 
I - GPYRGHT SAC would haul m1-` Thai " CPYRGHT- ru +n dew San? ?z - A~'`i~Feser: 00380004-4 ' G n , o r Power Avoids Critic sm pen g .uate.- Gen. Thom" Pow - _i. irlln half of his heavy bomb" ULtUE sw cufua. v. -. - Sep, rvw~., a would like to i Cofnmand are "riot ad ert. i t on sources py star staff wru.r. centage or tne muat:y Poor e reputation, for being able s ',> mairts~n what . Administration.plana f01 t n';deraan adequate airborp conceal things." Future General 5ay~ senator Johnson . bum .new administration budget pro ` AskCdT f~f ~Rusaits 'te reulleda U. S. Can't Be Sure and loacaed with bombs at a ( u 'tomes, a missile attack could no Withouh~lna hucarswithout ?t_ lit- 0 warning time will be zero. Gen? Power the planes were in the ai tt comme ntin~ Wbbuildmissilrei 4 But, said Gen. Power, w en S viet Union / the Soviets have 300 intercon- told that., the ? had ng 01 ',fill tinental ballistic missiles. the only one ICBM he wa o ` fitly n }a , , a _ C2 7 7 ,on their way to 1t11-Sm within ' ' graded.' Plans for SA C 15 minutes:, Therefore, Russia it Ck'" i f "a L th h would not consider an attach wilco W h a ~ Ap ~ er a1 S sates on Soviet missiles, centaue of SAC: s 1 P wv rsnmb- Gi Id F nre rnuid be oil thl crci;,id And owcr re lied iSiuiplY. ?'I don t possible future aeterrenr Ra w resent plans for CnL b &LL.. ,,As of this very mome It was only in answer o, tlon that could happen. If wel CPYRGHT Gen. Power said, "the Stra id uestions that Gen. Power -' arc surprised then it will be a 4.1- n, r. .., .,a ., for r pleasant surprise as it will be - the controversy over new Senators had to ask him se . - .. --, ..., ,,- - l in 1963. t? hearings by the Senate vigorous critic sm ning of '1961 through the UM paredness and Space Comm t- tration defense policies, b tlwhen a missile radar ,n uc1 tees. The group is eaplori en. Power refused to folio system is completed. perhaps public witness -in a series eared to be designed -I from the begin i admit of d SAC chief. told tbenftOra wu . s~emwtawv, ??-_? -_- on airborne, alert ?auranis ww..- e Gen. Power oral the en. loaves questions whichd of the greatest, miaaile, perio !perio "How muen force %-t uxe. to nave uue v," .,,.,. ----- teiitial aggressor thinks You 1 celed-B-70 superbomber tau d- periorr, the Joint Chiefs .,. c.,nrnf.rv of Defense ,y powerful military' force to pnElelrborne alert than the aam ~- J ~??>?? ??- ___~_ .t.t nnr nr b- .. ......N? , ~a nl snnatnr Saltonstall, Republi- have left alter au ab6R ing use of ,uv wviu ..??~?~?? -- - whgt counts in deterrence,' 1 and that he would like fa the President had to take _ 4 t t- .,or nnt of view than WANGTON 5 _ Johnson, RW16Y that present plans for s ture strengthof AC are in adequate and that this county of SAC would survive a futur missile attack to permit it be a good deterrent force. sty his recent New York speec missiles could knock out SA gwiets would have this for heioe this country was pr pared to meet t. Committee Counsel Edw . Weisl pointedeut that Defe~p~ Power's calculation Was realistic" - Key to Deterrence 'That speech was submit for clearance for correctn pertinent of Defense, the St Joint Chiefs Of Starf ana .Ar Staff." Get:. Power 1'he sneech was cleared, he For Release : CIA-RDPe . en. heas opposed "to the Unuuaa, He agreed wih ? r '