LUSH CHARGES AGAINST REP. RIVERS DEMAND INVESTIGATION BY CONGRESS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000700020003-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 9, 2004
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 14, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000700020003-3.pdf113.71 KB
Body: 
CHARL'..3TO1, W. VA. QUETTE if.. 66,414 104,948 MAR 141961 b4/12/15..' CiA-RbP4 use. Chares Against Rep. Rivr s .:Demand Investigation by Coiigress Congress, say Washington columnists to the noteworthy, though not celebrated, Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, "'has set fact that San Diego Isn't Rivers' hometown. laudable standards which must be applied Pearson and Anderson, it should be to other congressmen, whether white or': pointed out, don't suggest black." The reference to "laudable stand Rivers would ards" is to the punishment ,meted out by , . knowingly divulge national secrets. But se the representatives to their colleague, Rep. is tinder bizarre, influence of alcohol his behavior Adam Clayton Powell, D-N. Y. The im Ii_ :o rre, they maintain, that there is what cation that these standards aren't - being sitelli e p . Ri he might do. And, they add, applied to "other congressmen" Is about snce Re Rivers doesn t have either the Rep. Mendel Rivers, D-S. C. decency or the good sense to'resign his It Is the contention of Pearson and highly delicate posts, the House should act Anderson that Rivers is an alcoholic: In on Its own In behalf of the national interest. London, the char a he was found romp- ing through a hotel corridor in his underr- The charge nst Rep. Rivers deserve y g ' ~~ ., the attention of of his associates. 'Assuming .'shorts." Rivers, to quote the columnists, the charges are valid-a matter, incidental. "is a security risk. He can be trusted with ly, Pearson and Anderson take foe granted a secret no longer than it takes him to 1Pis well known to every House member - down a few jiggers; of bourbon." the next step is automatic. There can be Rep. Rivers ,is Chairman of the. House no doubt as to which representative (Powell Armed Services Committee. He Is addition=`' or Rivers) constitutes the larger menace to ally a member of the House watchdo the nation. committee which oversees and supervises Powell was never so strategically situ- the CIA. Both posts place him in a position .. ated he could hurt his country to the extent to hear and to know some of the nation's , that Rivers in an alcoholic fog might. No profoundest secrets. issue of security was involved in Powell's Few Americans, we believe, would con- ; flamboyant ~ escapades. Security, not alco- sign these secrets to the ears of a confirm holism, is the issue where Rivers is con. ed lush - in Congress, black or white. That,r cerned, precisely because of the crucial is why, if Pearson's and Anderson's charges' nature of his congressional. responsibilities. ,are true, the House should strip Rep. Rivers,'. One can imagine how . long 'Congress of his sensitive assignments.. would tolerate 'a CIA director. or a secre- Rep. Rivers is one of the capital's most,! 'tarp of state who' eani'ged around London powerful men. In the listing of 10 cities,::t', hotel; corridors in attire, appropriate only which the Defense Department recently said - for the gymnasium or the bedroom. Among would be provided with experimental anti-' Its Own members, who are privy to the missile protection, should such a system - same Information as the aforementioned be authorized, Charleston, S. 'C., of all'. executive officials, Congress must. demand places is among those named: San Diego similar standards of discretion and sobriety. on the other hand; probably the nation's To. assert' an allegation is not to affirm most important naval base and a metropolis it. 'Rep. Rivers is, entitled to be judged by with a population just 2,800 short of: 500,000' his peers. But the charges against him are and.greater than Charleston's, didn't make.' too serious to be shushed 'up, as was the the, select 10. The failure can be, attributed - Senate's handling 'of the Bobby Baker case. Approved For Release 2004/12/15 : CIA-RPP75-00149R000700020003-3