DAVID LAWRENCE AN 'ERA OF RIGHTEOUSNES'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000700270035-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 20, 2006
Sequence Number: 
35
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 28, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000700270035-1.pdf130.52 KB
Body: 
Approved'For Release 20 11 RDP75- DAVID -LAWRENCE n Maybe an "era of righteous-. abridged, directly or indirect- and professional affiliations of h f d 1 overnment members of both houses whole system of education in. pro em is _a,,,,,,,,, ,,,,r... ~denial of the money. that federal money is being federal government. public money and use its own _r n- ;,,,torment or discretion without cries of suspicion being voiced inga {he broad wishes of the assumed the right to withhold benetiting tram iE. , . s,:ai, .,ut' b.h a I There are, of course, some school boards which pparent-? :.'states, counties and cities. The A 'n contraven. federal government has. no "watchdog committee' to, ? . and cities. It maintains t a ;,,,,++ on i 'been any parallel to the The sums involved in the would hardly e a equa Plenty of' federal money, r cases that have recently been the Department of Health, Y in the headlines are trivial ' Education and Welfare today moreover, is going into pro)- !,''in comparison with the billions ... insists that it doesn't use its ects in different parts of the of dollars that are flowing' power to intervene in the country which are-politically ti. from the federal government slightest in the handling of ' ,beneficial to senators and j to the states and cities, with ,education by states, counties -representatives of those same'' h t 4 states But there has never the security of political parties -.. g , and officeholders. +,. in the educational processes ` flagrant cases are publicly b d to For ' exposed. are distributed to all parts of e p the United States to protect-' -'amendment that the federal. ;.punish its own ? members overnment shall not interfere unless to be sure, some ness" has been inaugurated. ly, by t e e era g Unfortunately, the limelight This proposal is being spon- should be disclosed. Codes of has been mistakenly focused sored also by Senators George ethics have been proposed, but on subsidies given to private - ? Smathers, D-Fla. and Sam J. no machinery for pursuing ' t organizations to protect Ervin Jr., D-N.C., and Rep. ? any violations. is mandatory. national security. Very little is Robert Sikes, D-Fla. This is undoubtedly due to the known by the public, however, But even a declaration political nature of Congress about the huge subsidies that through a constitutional itself and the unwillingness of 41, leadershi of a party to e f to prevent federal control of might not a ec they m pubhc?'schools. It would de- ,. with the exercise of discretion. federal function: Thus, far,., ,;~h,,,.~_ there has been no constitution-3 ,tutional amendment designea new consL,tiuLwc,n, aiuCUw"ol'~ here as if it were an accepted rfere t' 1 ' t f America, which is supposes to ouic,ais Lu W ILU,,,nu r,., ..~ . , pressure b the federal be the responsibility of the funds appropriated by Con- ?, Y i t-ca nna to rin cn for what government to change - a', taught, the kin of educational 'or,,. some time. e e ,. ~'r -A +hnnnalifien.'! been members -,of Congress,+.,,usUrpau0n.ofpoweri'.~;rt +. ciare that the rignti , uc eacu ?? my Avuo, a. w-...... - J. ' state to determine the subjects'' ing funds to school systems . , ; . _al.'. challenge presented to pu .1 th r have ?' an end ? to what is plainly. ; 4.