THE 'NEW' CIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000800170005-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 30, 1999
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 12, 1966
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000800170005-4.pdf115.39 KB
Body: 
' CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Sanitized -Approved For Release : IA= AUGUST 12, 19 STATINTL THE "NEW" CIA in South Victnnm should not have been Mr. YOUTVCi of Ohio. Mr, President, withdrawn loaf; ago. Instead, they op- the C.~:arat`. Intelligence Agency during crate a sort of an army of their own, In recent :, :~nrs has pcrfonned in a frighten- many instances employ.(niS Vietnamese inf: e:c.eulcr ill the judgment of many nationals, some of wliorr~ pose aS Viet- thoughtful Americans. Furthermore, tong and are said IA 1-,ave committed this .~,-cncy, which wns established for dastardly acts against the civilian pop- thc s~'te our;~ose of collecting intelligence, ulation of South Vietnam. Whether has bccanle a vast bureaucracy, and in these latter allegations are true I do not recent years has rucked up one hor- know. I hope they are not. There is rendous blunder alter another. risk however when an American intel- It is no longer simply nn h~telllgenco ligence agency employs nationals of oth- ? collecting agency, it it ever was. er nations in positions of any respons!- Wrnpped in its cloak of secrecy, it has bility. become a policy forming agency. Even its it is well-known and verified that CIA defenders cannot deny that its actions officials gave the Iate General MacArthur hove greatly influenced our foreign faulty infoi?mntion in the Korean con- policy, and in many instances to the flict. C~enerai MacArthur disregarded ' detriment of our Nntton. The CIA was his own intelligence furnished by officers never intended to direct file foreign policy of the intelligence section of his air force.. of our?couiitry, nor do influence 1t, but He was so foolish as to belteve the CIA? wns organized to be nn intelligence col- regarding the possible intervention of letting agency, not an operating or Chinese troops in the Korean war. They policymaking brnncll of our bVernment. informed him there was no possibility In spending taxpayers' money, it 1s out- of Chinese volunteers crossing the Yalu spending the entire State Department and attacking us. The result was our with our embassies and far-fltulg diplo- Armed Forces in North Korea were divid- mntlc seiwtce and Foreign Service offs- ed with a mountain range between them, clnls throughout the world. The CIA has and suddenly 200,000 Chinese volun- become asort of law unto itself. If it is ;leers" crossed the Yalu, attacked, and a watchdog for the welfare of Americans, drove back our forces despite their heroic as some of Its otriclals and employees :resistance. General MacArthur had acclaim, then truL?r it is a watchdog shortly before announced that the con- running wild without a muster. flict had ended with a glorious American What CIA operntlves have done in re- victory and that the boys would be home cent years in the Far East has in many ~' Christmas. instances been a distinct disservice to our There is a saying, "Experience keeps ` country. With more than 300,000 men,a dear school, but fools learn in no oth- oi our Armed Forces in Vietnam and er." Unfortunately, our generals appar- Thailand and with every branch of our sully have not lenl?ned the lesson of CIA Armed Forces having their intelligence'ineptne:s and failure fn Korea, in the sections, one wonders why the many.U-2 incident of May 1960, relative to the ? huIIdreds 0f CIA o?cisls sad aperstivea Bay of figs invasion, and in several oth- ti f i P th t A i -~ - er iascos n na ons o sou eas , s a, to name a few examples of CIA bungling. Mr. President, the time has definitely come for Congress to assert a more for- rnT.:Ta? r;~:rc r+1e