IMPLEMENTATION OF NSC 50
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP75-00662R000300050028-7
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
July 28, 1998
Sequence Number:
28
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 15, 1949
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 185.39 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2000/05/23 : CIA-RDOft- 0662R000300050
15 August 1949
?OR OF CENTRAL II LLTU1NCffi
SUBJECT$ implementation of XSC 50
randm dated 3 August 1949, subject as above,
ts ICA 'S, with Armstrong proposals
1. This office finds itself in fundamental disagreement with the
general principles underlying the specific recommondations in Mr.
Armstrong's proposals.
a. Are Armstrong has assumed that the specific organi-
tationa1. realign ants of C1A asndad by the Dulles report
have been specifically approved by the NSC and directed in
, approved only the "concept of CIA-
in the Dubs report as regards certain organisational matters,
and went on to state that "there may be other methods of or-
ganization which will accomplish the saw objectives".
b. . Armstrong has aes>assd that the NOCID's are ade-
quate instruments for the purpose of defining CIA's intelligence
activities and relations to the IAC agencies. On Viis point,
Yom. is in direct opposition, particularly with reference to
ID #1 and NSCID #3, both of w ich require extensive revision
in order to clarify the role of CIA in carrying out its inntae] i-
genre production responsibilities as these are visualised in the
Dulles report and in NSC 50. OU's specific objections to the
NSCID's in question are as follower
. they define National Intelligence an being
solely "integrated departmental intelligence"
and make no action of CIA's position as the
intelligence facility for the NSC;
Li . they do not provide for an adequate state-
mont of the CIA intelligence production
mission
iii. they do not Movies for adequate priority of
departtal support to CIA.
i -/, VL~ *t4,4~
Approved For Release 2000/05/23 : CIA-RDP75-00662R000300050028-7
Approved Fornelease 2000/05/23 : CIA-RDP7b0662R000300050028-7
a. ilr. Armstrong' a definition of nation 1 inte111geno ,
together with his concept of how it should be produced, Is
not, in our opinion, an sec rate interpretation even of the
existing definition, faulty as it in, as contained in NSCID #3.
2. In consideration of paragraph 1 above, it is believed that:
CIA should not enter into negotiations with the IAC
on any portion of the Arnetr'ong proposals which pertain
to internal CIA organisational matters*
B. CIA should pl"o, as first prio rityr for IAC negotiation
and NSC action, revisions of SCID 01 and NSCID #3 on the agenda
of the Standing Comittooo Revisions of the NSCID#s would Grover
mo?pt, if not aU, of the remaining questions contained in the
Armstrong proposals.
co In vier Of paragraphs 2 a and b above, the Armstrong pro.
ovals Should be withdrawn from IAC consideration.
3. ORE is in the prooee s of preparing re8ow endationa to you on
i leresntation of 50 insofar as intel33eesoe production end the
reepcrosibilities of this office are affected. These will include
organizational r+r ndatione.
4. Copies of an 'OH E proposed revision to SIC #1 w":ich has been
reviewed by the .) Intelligence Production Board are attached hereto
ter TAB A.
5. A draft of a posed revision to NSCI #3 Is in preparations
and will be forwarded upon completion* Specific caments on the four
Armstror proposals are included under TAB 13.
1 r CC`, i i3 ATI ? S s
1. That you 'advise the TAC s7
a* that the Armstrong proposals envies - e certain organitses-
tional changes which may not materialize in the final CIA
rendAtion for is 3+amsntstion
Approved For Release 2000/05/23 : CIA-RDP75-00662R000300050028-7
Approved Fo'Melease 2000/05/23 : CIA-RDPb0662R000300050028-7
b, that CIA firmly believes that ACID and NSCI D
require revision to "et the ob,jsetives of 50,, and that
the strop s*roposals should be considered in the light of
such p red ravisiona;
s, that for these reasons (]. it and b above) considers-
tion by the IAC of the rosg proposals should be deferred
until the 1AG and have completed action indicated in each
case;
that you are placing proposed revisions of NSCYA) #1
lb 13 on
2. tat you approve ti
after full CIA coordination*
revision of NSCID #1
ad: IsA&a'i
he
TAB As owed revision of MSCID #1
TAB Es 3peaifia camants on Armstrong mroposals
ORE:TB/IESsfd
Distribution:
Original to addresses
Executive
ICAPS
8/Pp
AD/ORE
Approved For Release 2000/05/23 : CIA-RDP75-00662R000300050028-7