NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

LETTER TO(Sanitized)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430018-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 13, 2001
Sequence Number: 
18
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 26, 1973
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430018-3.pdf50.69 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/05/06: CIA-RDP75-00793RQr0100430018-3 STATINTL STATOTHR 26 February 1973 #5 Dear Ray, I am startled to learvjjthat my wife is pestering you concerning our divorce arrangements and is asking you to provide priviledged treatment for tser lawyer. I do not feel that my professional relations with your firm enters into the divorce proceedings. My lawyer in the States is an associate o whom you endorsed and recommended in July 1970, as a lawyer w o had had connections with the firm. works STATOTHR with in the same legal firm, He may no ave ever worked for your firm, but evidently if my wife's lawyer is going to be made ppivy to matters related to my professional life, it would seem normal that you get in touch with my own STATOTHR lawyer, to check matters out with him, so as to avoid con usion tH-a-F could be prejudicial. STATOTHR STATINTL I don't see why U.S. lawyers should invo ve the firm in these divorce matters any more than the lawyers could have. I am mailing a copy of my W-2 form for 1972, which ought to satisfy my wife's demands, which should have simply been made through the lawyers, The 1971 income had already been communicated. Thus I do not see that you need to be involved,,. I personally do not feel that the firm should Iget involved in matters that are purely personal and that do not relate to my professional life. Initially the divorce was to have been obtained in nd we were both dealing with awyers, who could obviously not come running to you. My wl e d not follow-up on these proceedings and the matter is now under Maryland Sincerely yours, STATOTHR STAT8Tffl ?TATINfL STATINTL STATINTL Approved For Release 2002/05/06 : CIA-RDP75-00793R000100430018-3