MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE 303 COMMITTEE 11 MAY 1966

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75B00159R000200060062-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 21, 2006
Sequence Number: 
62
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 12, 1966
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75B00159R000200060062-6.pdf151.82 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/07/08: CIA-RDP75BOO159R000200060062-6 25X1 NSC review completed 12 May 1966 NRO review(s) completed. S B T: Minutes of the Meeting of the 303 Committee, 11 May 1966 P S02n hero 3ostow, Ambassador Johnson, Ho Vance, and Admiral L'.aborrn 25X1 and ibis o Albert Wheelon 1e A tide ranging"4iscussion took place on various aspects of ddaling with the possible deployment of OXCARTO 2 It became apparent that although the target breakdown for North Vietnam was well suumarized statistically, a qualitative analysis .of these targets had not been attempted. The acceptability of the fact that 11 targets would remain uncovered had, also not been determined. 3. General Taylor felt that a statistical and qualitative analysis should also be done for the South China targets in order to obtain a more complete.pictureo General Taylor also made the point that we were addressing (in the proposed deployment of OXCART) the question of surprise attack by China rather than tactical improvements in the war in Vietnam. 4, , Mr. Rvstow raised the question of whether, if the decision, were made to bomb POLL in North Vietnam, this would have the corollary effect of raising our requirements for observation. Mr. Vance thought the answer was yes General Taylor felt that the bombing of POL in North Vietnam was not a consideration in the deployment of OXCART. against that'need the increased risk discussed "but pointed out that you would, have to weigh in :para' 5 of SNIE 10-2-66. "A P 1 .U. S. Course of Action.".- ction. ": Also present were General Maxwell D. Taylor, Also I I I Y+ n ~'t }1 i MOR I/i n F Approved For Release 2008/07/08: CIA-RDP75BOOl59R000200060062-6 Approved For Release 2008/07/08: CIA-RDP75B00159R000200060062-6 u.Gt'a: ode 7. Ambassador Johnson raised the question: Why do we make the'decision now if the-recommendation is for a September deployment? Admiral Reborn underlined the fact that he had always stuck to the 30 day stretch as the safest time factor for a deployment. General Taylor raised the question: If we are going to make a covert deploy ,aunt is there any other better time than right now? Will there ever .be a more propitious time? 8e Ambassador Johnson made the point that the principals had not sufficiently addressed themselves to cover and contingency prob lems. The elaborate cover plans-were to a'.certain extent. self delu- sory. It was one thing for. the pilot to have memorized a set story but. quite another for the U.S. Government to know exactly how'it felt and what.it was going to say. 90 The Executive Secretary queried whether the camera complex now available was not far superior to that maintained in existing systems. The retort was, yes, there was a marked improvement in resolution in the OXCART system. 100 The Executive Secretary indicated a major factor in the deployment decision would be the negotiations with foreign govern agents for emergency landing rights. He particularly cited Japan d b or assa with its traditional proprietary interest in Okinawa. Am Johnson said this was a puzzler, and he wanted to think and discuss the Japanese aspects with his colleagues. : 11. General Taylor reminded the principals that they should not forget to address themselves. to the basic question: Is now the best time for deployment? 12. What then, in conclusion, did the meeting decide? First, there would be a qualitative judgment on the target question in regard to Worth Vietnam and a statistical and. qualitative judgment on the ..target problem in South China, r~'' Second, the principals would do their homework on just what posture the USG would take (i.e. contingency statements) in'regard to deployment of OXCA1T .and its planned uses. Third, Ambassador Johnson would explore the problems surrounding deployment to Okinawa that might arise with Japan. When the aforementioned problems have been assessed, then the Committee would be in a . betters pooition to pose the entire problem to higher authority.. Motributidn Hr., Vance ? C OP Y Y" c - SA L .Admiral Reborn , ;i } }. t - Dated: 12 1Vlav 1966 ID Approved For Release 2008/07/08: CIA-RDP75B00159R000200060062-6