LETTER TO DAVE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75B00159R000200150003-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 10, 2005
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 14, 1971
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75B00159R000200150003-1.pdf58.52 KB
Body: 
Approved Fowlease 2005/1f e DRAFT 14 July 1971 concerning the U-2, I would like to propose another solution which mayi. alleviate the commitments of the Air Force fleet, and result in an overall improvement in the utilization of the total resources. In- stead of transferring one aircraft to the Air Force, the CIA through judicious scheduling and aircraft utilization, can accept the NRO Cuba photography requirement with our present total resources. This should increase the flexibility of the Air Force fleet in that it would release the aircraft presently used for this mission to support other requirements. While this arrangement would significantly increase the commitments of our Edwards Detachment and would quite probably require a relocation of assets, I feel that it is within our capability. If this distribution of assets is not feasible and it becomes" necessary to move one aircraft to the Air Force, we will almost certainly be required Dear Dave, In reference to the letter you gave me at lunch the other day 75 B001 0000200150003-1 25X1 to bring one aircraft back to the U. S. to meet i the training, maintenance and contingency requirements. This would be testing of equipment which is then utilized by the entire U-2R fleet. necessary as a large portion of our effort at Edwards is devoted to systems L_ here USAF review(s) completed. 75B00159R000200150003-1 oil .Z'P9 NRO r i@Wo iffiWfW~e 200513 Approved Foolease 201 ?1 ~E bP75B001S000200150003-1 Page 2 and like systems are completely tested and evaluated by our Edwards Detachment and then used throughout the U-ZR inventory. Without a third aircraft at Edwards we would quite often have periods where one aircraft was out of commission and the other aircraft configured for specific tests and not available to fulfill our contingency requirements. 25 Approved For Release 2005 13SMtP75B00159R000200150003-1