ALL FOR WANT OF A HORSESHOE NAIL.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75B00326R000100200018-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 13, 2002
Sequence Number: 
18
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 20, 1974
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75B00326R000100200018-4.pdf177.5 KB
Body: 
RM ?72 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS Approved F elea 3,0 rs7~jQ ig, 75%P3f6R000100200018-4 FILE INI-U a? `1 REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED i~ 1 3 s ACTION '' i 6 t 1 i s 2 O 12 17 3 13 18 4 14 19 5 1(j} is 20 25X1A S E C R ET 2e0E45Z 25X1A IMMEDIAT 25X1A IDEALIST D. I wrw 4% A 14 1F 14 E 2-X1A E. MAY 74 CITE - R YBAT SST OURIER PROBLEMS - COURIER PROBLEMS COURIER PROBLEMS ON'S DE1. R7 T,4KE SUGGESTS A STATES DECISION UP TO USAFE 25X1A SUBJ: "ALL FOR WANT OF A HORSESHOE NAIL." FOR BE BRIEFED AND 1. APPRECIATE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM, BUT THERE ARE A FEW FACTS OF WHICH YOU ARE UNAWARE. FIRST, THE T-39 WAS NOT HELD UP IN EXCESS OF AN HOUR WAITING FOR THE TAPE TO BE DUPED. THE T49 WAS TURNED AROUND IN ONE PLUS FIFTEEN. AS A PILOT YOU CAN CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THERE IS A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME CONSUMED IN TAXIING, REFUELING, REFILING (STOPOVER FLT PLANS NOT ALLOWED UNDER ICAO), AND RECEIVING NECESSARY CLEARANCES. WRAPPING THE TAKE AND DUPING THE TAPE WERE PERFORMED COINCIDENT WITH, AND NOT AFTER THOSE ACTIONS REQUIRED TO GET THE T-39 AIRBORNE. THE TAKE WAS READY AT ABOUT THE SAME TIME THE 25X1 low Approved For Release 2002/07/10 : CIA-RDP75B00326R000100200018-4 RM -72 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED ACTION 1 6 1 1 16 2 7 12 17 3 8 13 18 4 9 14 19 5 10 15 20 2gX1A 2?X1 I PAGE TWO X0309 S E C R E T T-39 PILOTS ARRIVED AT OUR HANGAR. AT THAT TIME THE AVIONICS REP REPORTED THE TAPE WOULD BE READY WITHIN TWENTY FIVE MINUTES. ALTHOUGH AWARE THE TAKE SHOULD NOT BE DELAYED, WE ASSUMED THERE WAS SOME LATITUDE FOR JUDGEMENT AS TO WHAT WOULD CAUSE A DELAY. IN VIEW OF SCHEDULED DEPARTURE OF 2325Z AND ESTIMATED TIME ENROUTE #V EFFECT # SINCE SCHEDULED ARRIVAL TIME POSSI1;u-sw'f% 4VE ftNY M FOR THE T-39, WE DID NOT SEE HOW AN EXTRA TWENTY FIVE MINUTES COULD WAS SIX HOURS PRIOR TO SCHEDULED DEPARTURE OF IN ANY EVENT, THE MAXIMUM DELAY CAUSED BY WAITING FOR THE TAPE WAS 15-20 MINUTES. 1w TO IMPLY THAT THIS WAS THE TOTAL CAUSE OF A HALF DAY DELAY AT DESTIN- 2 X1A ATION IS INACCURATE AND GROSSLY UNFAIR. THERE WAS OVER A TWO HOUR 25X1 25X1 GROUND TIME AT I Approved Fo eleaWL $IVTM : 5 3F8'R000100200018-4 NOW YOU DID NOT MENTION THIS; ONLY THE DELAY AT ALSO, THE IMPLICATION THAT THIS INFORMATION WAS DELIBERATE- LY CONCEALED I S UNWARRANTED I N VIEW OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF REF B. THE ONLY REASON IT WAS NOT MENTIONED I N REF C I S THAT IT WAS NOT 9 AND STILL IS NOT CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT. Ri$ 0 NS 1,8 l Ll ~' y 2. CONCUR THAT COURIER MOVEMENT IS OSA , HOWEVER, TOTAL TAKE MOVEMENT IS RESPONSIBILITY. IT WAS CERTAINLY NOT OUR INTENT TO BE CRITICAL OF OSA IN REF C, BUT TO SOLICIT ASSISTANCE FROM SAC BY HAVING THEM TASK THE 99SW IN ORDER TO MAKE SAC FLIGHTS 25X1 25XT I Approved For Release 2002/07/10 : CIA-RDP75B00326R000100200018-4 FORM USE PREVIOUS (44) 9-72 2820 EDITIONS Approved Fo6Releasit2(kQMVjtb: Q IA975BQ 32 8000100200018-4 REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED ACTION 1 6 11 16 2 7 12 17 3 13 18 -_--- 4 9 14 19 5 IQ 15 20 25V1 A PAGE THREE 0319 S E C R E T AVAILABLE IN THE EVENT MAC FLIGHTS DID NOT PROVIDE THE BEST TIMELI- NESS AND TO MAKE SAC GENERALLY AWARE OF WHAT APPEARED TO BE WRONG IN AN ATTEMPT TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. SENDING REF C ACTION TO SAC MAY HAVE BEEN QUESTIONABLE, HOWEVER, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN INFORMED EVEN THOUGH INFO ADDRESSEE. THERE I S A SAC LIAISON OFFICER HERE. HE KNOWS WHAT WAS WRONG AND FEELS SAC AS THE OPERATIONAL COMMAND SHOULD KNOW ABOUT IT. I AGREE WITH HIM. WE HAVE AN EXCELLENT WORKING RELATIONSHIP, AND I HOPE YOU DO NOT EXPECT ME TO PLACE HIM IN THE POSITION WHERE HE CANNOT COMMUNICATE WITH HIS PARENT COMMAND. 3. THE "TAKE MOVEMENT SHOW" COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER, HOWEVER YOU f)VER>,_OOKED THE BASIC CAUSES; A BROKEN AIRCRAFT AND LACK OF FORMAL 25X1 TASKING. TO STOP AND BRIEF THE AIR TERMINAL MANAGER ON NEL, REF E, PARA 3, SIMPLY DOES NOT GET THE JOB DONE. THE ONLY WAY THE NEED FOR EXPEDITIOUS MOVEMENT OF ~~ ~~ P~RS~V' 25X1A -r4E Sr iloN . E LZ- CAN BE CORRECTED IS TO FORMALLY TASK MAC AND USAFE. HAD THIS BEEN DONE THE AIRCRAFT THAT DEPARTED JUST PRIOR TO 25X1; THE ARRIVAL OF OUR COURIER WOULD HAVE WAITED. A S IT WAS, YOU WERE TRUSTING T O PURE LUCK T O EXPECT THE COURIER TO ARRIVE I N TIME TO CATCH AN AIRCRAFT FOR WHICH HE WASN'T SCHEDULED, AND WHICH TOOK OFF THREE HOURS PRIOR TO HIS SCHEDULED FLIGHT DEPARTURE. Approved For Release 2002/07/10 : CIA-RDP75B00326R000100200018-4 FORM 9-72 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS Approved FFo6Releas@:g2QQXQF7jAQ): Q IRPP,5BW 000100200018-4 %so REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED ACTION 1 6 11 16 2 7 12 17 3 8 13 18 4 9 14 19 5 10 15 20 2 UM A PA GE FOUR 0318 S E C R E T 4. IN SHORT, I AM INTERESTED IN CORRECTING THE SITUATION 9ND GETTING ON WITH THE JOB, BUT CANNOT ACCEPT THE THESIS THAT OUR MINIMAL DELAY CAUSED A TRAGEDY. E-2 IMPDET S E C R E T BT Approved For Release 2002/07/10 : CIA-RDP75B00326R000100200018-4