CASE COMPROMISE TO DOMINICK AMENDMENT TO SECTION 515 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZATION ACT (S. 3390)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP75B00380R000100020004-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 3, 2003
Sequence Number:
4
Case Number:
Publication Date:
June 21, 1972
Content Type:
MFR
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 138.91 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 20041e TI ,
~i I t tv!
mor,,7A
003808000100020004-9
OLC 72-0736
21 June 1972
SUBJECT: Case Compromise to Dominick Amendment to Section 515
of the Foreign Assistance Authorization Act (S. 3390)
1. Miss Cheryl Klein, in the Office of Senator Dominick, reported
to us today that she had received a call from John Marks, on the staff of
Senator Clifford Case (the author of Section 515 of the Foreign Assistance
Authorization bill), and stated that the Senator did not want Dominick's
amendment to come to a vote on the Senate floor and they were prepared to
offer a compromise, striking Laos and North Vietnam from the Section,
leaving its application only to Thailand. Marks commented that they felt
their section might well be in jeopardy in conference anyway.
25X1
2. Miss Klein told Marks that the Senator was tied up in a Committee
markup session this afternoon and she was not sure when she could get to
him. I told her that I was quite certain a compromise along the lines
suggested by Marks would take care of the Agency problem with respect to
the ut that this raised a larger question as to whether the
application of the section to Thailand creates any problem for the Administra-
tion. I told her that I would be in touch with the State Department on this.
25X1A 3. After talking with Messrs. FE Division,
25X1A and OGC, I subsequently talked wit Mr. James Halmo and
Mr. Marshall Wright, in the State Department, and advised them of the
25X1A
compromise offered by Case's office. also communicated this
information to Chuck Darris and Mark Pratt, in State, with the suggestion
that it be brought to the attention of Ambassador William Sullivan.
Approved For Release 200/%' l
0006*C, 11/7/2003
Approved For Release 2004/ f :~CIAR P7gB00380R000100020004-9
4. After consultation with the Director, and Mr. John Lehman, of
the White House staff, and with the agreement of Mr. Wright I called
Miss Klein back and suggested a revision of Section 515 which would be
acceptable to the Agency. It would strike entirely Subsection (b) and change
former Subsection (a) to read as follows:
No funds authorized under this Act shall be made
available by any means by any officer, employee, or agency
of the United States Government for the purpose of financing
any military operations by foreign forces in Thailand unless
Congress has specifically authorized or specifically authorizes
the making of funds available for such purpose."
I told Miss Klein that they were obviously negotiating from a position of
strength and should hold to this language as a minimum position. I pointed
out, however, that a final decision to accept Case's compromise should come
from the State Department.
5. I also suggested that in preparing a position for Senator Dominick
they should state that while he feels Section 515 should be stricken from the
bill entirely the agreed language would satisfy his principal concerns and he
would be willing to leave the final decision with respect to Thailand to the
conferees. I pointed out that Senator Stennis took this kind of a position on a
similar provision in this legislation last year and the measure was stricken
in the House/Senate conference.
6. Later in the day Miss Klein called and said she had spoken briefly
to Senator Dominick about the handling of the amendment and he had indicated
his agreement with striking Subsection (b) of Section 515 and deleting reference
to "any provision of law" as it appeared in Subsection (a). She went on to say,
however, that he was thinking of requesting four hours for debate on the amend-
ment and requesting a secret session of the Senate in order to allow a full
discussion of the matter. I told Miss Klein I thought this was much to much
time (that a half hour of debate on each time seemed sufficient) and that I
thought requesting a closed session of the Senate was a big mistake. She said
she had talked with John Goldsmith, of the Senate Armed Services Committee
staff, about the four-hour time limit and both he and Ed Braswell, of the staff,
felt that the Senator should allow only enough time for the presentation of the
statements of the various members who supported the bill.
Approved For Release 2004
0I r` ',J00380R000100020004-9
25X1A
Approved For Release 2004/01/14: CIA-RD P7 B00380R000100020004-9
7. She said she had some difficulty with the Senator's reasoning for
such a long debate period and for a secret session and would take this up with
him again in the morning. I told her that we would consult with the Director
on the idea of a secret session and we would talk further tomorrow morning.
Deputy Legislative Counsel
25X1A
Distribution:
Original - Subject
1-OGC
I -
OLC/GLC:mmc (22 June 1972)
Approved For Release 200411` I . C~'1~''- i 7 03808000100020004-9