NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

ISRAELIS BUILDING BARRIER IN CANAL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75B00380R000400010012-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 2, 2005
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 18, 1973
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75B00380R000400010012-8.pdf105.39 KB
Body: 
WASEJJ U:ruty rvai 18 NOV 1973 Approved or Re e 2 / S9 : CIA-RDP75B00380R000400010012-8 Israciis r er in Canal War Was Hinted By Michael Getter Washington Post Staff Writer A Central Intelligence Agency report late in Sep- tember warned the White House. of a strong possibility that war might soon break out in the Middle East, ac- cording to reliable sources. The CIA evaluation, based mostly on unusually large Egyptian maneuvers near the Suez Canal, did not go so far as to predict flatly that an invasion was certain. But the signs were viewed as sufficiently ominous to be immediately passed along at very high 1 e v e 1 to the Israelis. Tel Aviv, however, report- At that time, Kissinger said tion of only 'certain officials, under questioning that "... all reportedly warned that the the_ intelligence at our dis-) 1 b f e Oct 6) and all t September maneuvers this c. oa posy the:iutelligence given to us by ! Year were different and more foroien countries suggested ominous than the past. that there was no possibility Informants say there were of the outbreak of a war." Sources say there is no quoation that in the period be- tween the end of September - after the Israelis had chal- lenged the CIA warning-and, just a day or so before the war actually started, the Unit-!, e States had accepted the Is- many more troops involved than in the past, more ammu- nition being used and stock- piled, a much greater logistics build-up and, perhaps most im- portantly, more field commu- nications being hooked up and operated-something which occasionally can be listened in racli view that "they knew ` on by electronic sensors. best" and there was no cause The transfer of officials for alarm. !within the Defense Intelli- But Kissinger's assertion', gence Agency, according to that the intelligence available one source, came about be suggested "no possibility of cause of some strong objec. the outbreak of a war" is re- tions voiced by these officials garded by a number of sen- before the war started to the ioc- officials both in and out of validity of these danger sig- edly disputed the American the` intelligence field as an nals. interpretation of Egyptian overstatement at the very At his Oct. 12 press_ confer- ,teem in which Israeli inter- : ligence is held in Washing- ton and the closeness of the other parts of the intelligence tendency to "fit the facts into Israelis to the would-be war community such as the State existing preconceptions and to, zone, the Israeli assessment Department, while not making make them consistent with was quickly accepted here. outright predictions of war- what is anticipated." As late as Oct. 4, just two fare, were certainly express- By and large, the prevailing days before the war began, ing-wariness. view since the 1967 war had the joint U.S. Intelligence The most difficult, and some been- that the Arab armies', Board, made up of represen- say impossible, part of intelli- would never risk another hu-+ tatives from several intelli- gence work, however, is the miliating defeat at the hands of gence agencies - including difference between gathering Israel. CIA-took a common position facts and estimating inten- th6t hostilities were unlikely, tions. It is this difference that according to informants here. Kissinger sought to emphasize The readiness to accept the at, an earlier Oct. 12 press con- Israeli view, the failure to heed ference when he _ was ques- some unusual danger signals tion.ed about the apparent in anti the general surprise of telligence failure in not pre-: the.. Arab attack has caused dieting the attack. considerable post-war concern, Kissinger said then that both within the administration - both U.S. and Israeli intelli- I and the intelligence commu- gence had been aware of the nity. pre-war build-up of forces in Within the Pentagon's Egypt and Syria. He explained that Egyptian army maneu- Defense Intelligence Agency?! vers on the west side of the it. has been learned tliat the !Suez Canal had been carried three top men--an Army co- I out during September in each loner, Navy captain and senior l of the last 10 years. He indi- the Ian Middle official-who Fast intelligeheadednce caged that three times during the I the week preceding the war, branch were transferred out ! asked of those jobs in the aftermath assessments had been from U.S. and Israeli intelli- of the fighting. gence agencies and that each At the same time, however, time they concluded that .the' existence of the earlier - "hostilities were unlikely to CIA warning, roughly one to the point of there being no two. weeks before the fighting - chance of it." started, seems to suggest that Yet the earlier CIA report, the. intelligence community which informants say was con wag not totally as flat-footed which at Secretary of State llenry A.I tained in the more highly clas- sources here suggest that ?gence assessments". . the xi mVeid cF106 Rel 6,2005/06/08?teQIA*RE)P46'B0OP80ROO0400010012-8 25 press conference. . -ports that come to the atten-