THE NATIONAL RESOURCE INFORMATION ACT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75B00380R000700020001-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 2, 2005
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 22, 1974
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75B00380R000700020001-6.pdf727.61 KB
Body: 
4g /v13 5-- May 22, 1974 Approved FocgtAMENIMA19ftakaltiPP7SENA Cities which will lose Federal sewage works grants for fiscal year 1975 due to executive impoundment [Funds lost in thousands] Westfield Lapel Portland - Alexandria ? Westport HaMMOnd Trail Creek 2794 1239 364 867 33 4050 1425 Scott County RSb 2250 Lebanon 1440 Paoli eo French Lick 67 Auburn 930 Greencastle 3310 Orleans 38 E. Barthlomew R$D 3375 Milan 45 Hope 112 Michigan City 2063 Town of Pines 895 Zionsville 38 Trafalgar 450 Redkey 188 Parker City 45 Campbellsburg 81 Selma 749 ? Broolwille Marion 20 Matthews ? 7 Avilla 21 Brennen 027 Jackson Cty. RSD 225 DiIlaboro 14 Huntertown 18 Ingalls 445 EXHIBIT 1 M 10, 1974. Re Municipal Sewage Works s ants?State of Indiana. MT. FRANCIS MAYO, - Regional Administrator, Env nmental Pro- tection Agency, Chicag 11. DEAR MR, MAYO: On M 9, the Indiana Congressional DelegatM and their aides met with Lieutenant G ernor Robert Orr and representatives of e Indiana Stream Pollution Control Boar discuss problems that exist with the M cipal Sewage Works Grant program in In a. Of special con- cern to us were the p ? lems associated with the expenditure of remaining $41.3 mil- lion In FY '73 fed funds that must be obligated before Ju 30, 1974. The Stream Pal ? ion Control Board rep- resentatives descr d 20 projects totalling less than $26 mill that have met all major grant requireme and appear likely to re- ceive a grant be e the June 30, 1974, dead- line. Eligible cts remain to be developed for purposes of ncumbering the remaining $15 million. T remaining 28 communities on the MPL Sat are listed as eligible for FY '73 money ppear unlikely to qualify for any grant ot than step 1 planning money. Review of t FY '74 MPL through 143 does not reveal flicient number of communi- ties that c fully qualify for grants. There- fore, it is arent that expenditure of the $41.3 milli within the eligible 143 on the MPL is ve unlikely. The re ns for the problems in obtaining a outride number of eligible projects are as follow 1. Th -delay in the development of an approve priority rating system and MPL for the t program. 2. late (February 11, 1974) publica- tion nal conetruction grant regulations and late publication of guidelines for fac plan preparation and infiltration- Intl(' _requirements, prohibited an early, timely response on the part of communities and consultants. ? There are projects beyond 143 on the L that have plans and specifications co leted and are prepared to commence co ? ruction. It would seem desirable to us to ard grants to these communities. The communities would have been funded b on the Board's original FY '73 MPL. The ? mmunities were advised of their polluti. control needs la the plan of implemen ion and proceeded to qualify for funds direct result of that requirement. Sever are under Stream Pol- lution Control B orders and two under U.S. EPA 180 da- .otice orders. A few com- munities are u er a sewer ban because of over loaded t tment plants and develop- ment has be restricted. The communities sincerely be ed that they would be funded and proce d to invest considerable sums of money engineering. At this time, the 1972 a dments and the subsequently promu ted regulations resulted in a re- vised iority rating system. e are clear Indications that this se- qu a of events produced significant in- c. ties. We were advised by the Stream Pol- on Control Board representatives that ere are projects beyond position 143 on the PL that are ready to proceed and should be considered for available FY '73 grant funds in priority order. These projects deserve every consideration. We urge your reconsideration of the pres- ent situation which not only penalizes the citizens of Indiana, but also delays the Im- plementation of the objectives of the Mu- nicipal Sewage Works Grant program de- veloped by the U.S. Congress. VANCE HARTKE, BIRCH BATH, U.S. Senators, RAY J. MADDEN, EARL F. LANDGREBE, JOHN BRADEMAS, J. EDWARD RousH, ELWOOD H. Hmids, WILLIAM G, BRAY, JOHN T. MYERS, ROGER H. ZION, LEE H. HAMILTON, DAVID W. DENNIS, WILLIAM H. HIIDNUT III, Members of Congress. THE NATIONAL RESOURCE INFORMATION ACT Mr. WILLIAMS. Mr. President, the need for decisive action on many short- age problems and natural resource is- sues is confronting us now as at no time in the past. Recent events in the energy field and with basic industrial materials have highlighted many other problems which we will continue to face. For ex- ample, the expected shortages of food in many parts of the world?aggravated by uncertainties over the availability of fertilizer?must be one of the priority issues with which all policymakers must deal, as must be population control measures. We can no longer afford to consider these various decisions in isola- tion from each other. The recent rejection of the U.S. aid proposal at the U.N. special session on Third World resource and economic problems is unfortunate. Nevertheless, we must urge that an active Participa- tion in the formulation of new policies In these critical areas continue. Our national self-interest requires that we insure that these policies are coordinated g,JO 000700020t07,9l S 8869 with domestic economic conditions to avoid negative effects both at home and abroad. A wheat deal, for example, should not inevitably result in higher prices and dislocations in the domestic economy. Planning ahead and combin- ing foreign policies with domestic eco- nomic realities can help to avoid disas- trous programs, while insuring the maxi- mum amount of cooperation. Among Federal agencies, there are ex- amples of a lack of coordinated policies. The near-embargo in 1973 of soybean exports has been criticized by the Gen- eral Accounting Office as a decision that ignored consultation between the De- partment of Commerce and the Depart- ment of State?resulting in consequences which counteracted several established policies. The GAO reported that the soy- bean embargo worsened an existing world food shortage, ran counter to efforts to increase exports, had adverse effects on the balance of payments, and also depressed domestic agriculture. Other such conflicting actions lately have involved the Agriculture Depart- ment and the Cost of Living Council in disagreements over the relative needs for increasing agricultural exports and the stabilization of domestic food prices. The United States must take an active role in this effort by virtue of our enor- mous stake in the world community and the international economy. We have 6 percent of the global population and consume at least 27 percent of all raw materials?including 34 percent of the energy resources. As the world's largest exporter of food, our policies in part determine the well-being of millions of people around the globe, while, on the other hand, the United States is directly affected by the export policies of other nations. Our reliance on foreign sources for energy and mineral materials has demonstrated the necessity for coopera- tive policies. The nations of this world are becoming increasingly interdepend- ent so that inflated prices and withheld supplies have a ripple effect throughout all economies. Present shortages result from a com- bination of at least seven factors: First, the United States has been rely- ing increasingly on foreign sources for petroleum and certain other scarce min- erals. In the 1970's, growing demand and worldwide competition for these re- sources has caused a problem of con- straints on global supply. The Arab oil embargo, following the outbreak of war in the Middle East, in particular, strained the capacity of U.S. energy in- dustries to adjust to a very significant interruption of foreign imports; Second, the effects of the Arab oil em- bargo also reduced allocations to users of petroleum-related products; Third, some industries, including those producing metals, petrochemicals, and textiles, are emerging from a prolonged period of overcapacity and depressed prices, which makes them unable to meet sharply increasing demands; Fourth, economic price controls were imposed at a time when some commodity Approved For Release 2005/06/09 : CIA-RDP75600380R000700020001-6 S 8870 Approved For IklOtsigatOMIN2 acmau97.5Eameito00700020001-vay 22, iJ)74 prices were at long-term or seasonally -- low levels; Fifth, demand for durable goods has been increasing; Sixth, some 1973 crop yields were lower than expected, or were limited by acreage allotments; and Seventh, exports of many commoditieS have expanded rapidly duk to favorable overseas prices. Proposals before the Congress which would establish broad policies and a com- prehensive mechanism for ;averting fu- ture shortages and resouree crises de- serve our immediate attentien. The Na- tional Resource Informaidon System, which is embodied in Senate bill 3209, the proposal which I must 'veer for ime plementing a sophisticated ?and credible organization to accomplish _the complex task of monitoring and analyzing our re- source scarcity problems. As originally drafted, S. 3209 would establish a Bureau of Resource Information inathe Depart.; ment of Commerce. This office was mod- eled on a similar provision in the Energy Information Act, which in tarn was pate terned after the functions c the Bureau of the Census, as an independent and highly credible source of ratviata and in- formation analysis. However, I have concluded as did Sen- se ator NELSON, the sponsor of this Na- tional Resource Information Act, in re- cent testimony on the bill, that a new and altogether independent agency?prefer- ably one responsible to the Congress? would be the most effective institutional setting for such an important function. Senator NELSON testified ths(t the mission of this agency would be to monitor the use of all resources and to. collect data so that country would know,- What and when to conserve, jiow much to produce, how to avoid shorfages or gluts cauSed by ignorance, and when to begin sig. nificant research programs. The report just released bi the General Accounting Office on the Government's ability to cope with shortaas concluded that, for the future, basic commodity problems 'have not even been adequately defined, let alone agreed upop." The GAO, has also tentatively endorsed the idea of making the agency an independent unit. An independent agency mould give the necessary objectivity and integrity to the gathering of information 'Which would then be used for determininy policy, not only by decisionmakers threughout got- ernment, but in the priVate actor and on the international level. This common base of data reporting and statistical analysis is crucial if we are top make sense out of the present conflict pf facts and policies which are often generated for special purposes or to -suppnrt foregone conclusions or decisions. Rent criticisni of the validity of the Consumer Price Index?CPI?and the Whcdesale Price Index?WPI?shows them to be exam- pies of another problem with economic data. Many of these problems could be over- come by a new and independent agency addressing itself to contemporary and long-range questions on resource infor-; mation. A new agency might involve totally new personnel, or it could take the form of selected reorganization in order to create the most effective and efficient operation. But questions about organilational arrangements or an af- finity for exiSting programs should not obscure our thinking about the?best way to approach this issue. Although much useful work is being done on thisnroblem, our activity has been fragmente4 and tn- caordinated with regard to infermation capabilities for planning and policy- making. Thisehas been documented in the introductory statement on the National Resource Information Act. Computer technoiogy, for instance, is not being used to its fullest advantage in maintain- ing and coordinating Government data gathering programs in the natural re- source S fielcl, especially for the sharing of unique or costly informationactivities. Thus, an information shortage affects our ability to anticipate, avoid, or man- age shortages of materials. Too much confusion, too many conflicting facts and arguments have slowed our efforts to come to grips with our current dilemmas in energsy, environment? and economics. We clearly do not have the kind of ad- vance Warning and step-by-step planning needed for the future. Coneern over the long-term_ avala- bility of some commodities focuses on in- creasing consumption rates worldwide, when contrasted with decreasing amounts of known reserves of nonrenew- able minerals, and the potential threat of the formation of cartels to withhold supplias for a variety of reasons. Of the 14 to i8 basic raw materials considered necessary for an industrial society, the United States depends on imports for more than half its supply of six of them: aluminum; chromium; manganese; nickel; tin; and zinc, One principal fac- tor for some imports has been their lower cost conipared to economically-exploita- ble resources in the United States. The U.S. Geological Survey has com- pleted the first overall assessment of the Nation's mineral resources in 18 years and reported a "mineral crisis." Many known mineral deposits are seriously de- pleted and future supplies have either not yet been discovered or are too deep to be economically mined. Minerals for which "large" or "huge" resource bases remain, include iron, coal, uranium, pe- troleum, aluminum, copper, zinc, lead, manganese, nickel, gypsum, sulfur, and molybdenum. "Small" or "insignificant" reserves are reported for tin, asbestos, chromium, fluorine, mica, and mercury. For these and most of the remaining 50 or sio mineral commodities, U.S. abil- ity to Meet projected needs will depend on increasingly sophisticated, yet eco- nomical, technology; recycling and con- servation in mineral production and use; and imports. In addition, many minerals are being lost or wasted because of in- sufficient economic incentive for their re- c Wee ry: The final report of the National Com- mission on Materials-Policy in June 1973 outlined the following summary direc- tives fcir policymakers: First strike a balance between the need to produce goods and the need to protect the environment by modifying the materials system so that all resources, including environmental, are paid for by users; Second, strive for an enuilibrium be- tween the supply of materials and de- mand by increasing primary produetion, by accelerating waste recycling, and im- proving efficiency-of-use of materials; and Third, manage materials policy more effectively by recognizing the complex interrelationships of the materials/en- ergy/environment system so that laws, executive orders, and administrative practices reinforce policy and do not counteract it. The National Commission's studies re- veal that? Extensive interdependence exists among the nations of the world for raw materials land that] . . . lrilo major nation nor group of nations is completely self-sufficient in all raw materials essential to an industrial Econ- omy Using data from the Geological Survey, the Commission found that domestic production remains the primary Source of materials for the United States, al- though the Commission notes that ix, the last 20 years the percentages of imports, In the aggregate, for domestic consump- tion "have grown slightly" as a percent- age of domestic consumption. This trend is anticipated to continue, accordir g to the report. However, the Commission recommends relying on market forces to determine the mix of imports and do- mestic production, but with the proviso that? Where costly and dangerous reliance upon Imported materials ... the Government-Must intervene. Two problems found by the Commis- sion which are related to the domsstic minerals posllion of the United Slates vis-a-vis its Imports are that?the pro- portion of recycled materials is declining, and?policy formulation for materials management Is "handicapped by Made- _ _ quate, inaccurate, or inaccessible ir f or- mation." Population increases indicate a dou- bling time of about a generation fox the present population which will necesatate a doubling of food production in the next generation unless that growth rate is reduced. Otherwise we can anticipate no !solu- tion whatever. The same spectre son- fronts us for minerals, fuels, and other nonrenewable resources; although in this case, most of the resources are of faille quantity and eventually will be depleted. In light of such projections, with their assumptions Of present rates of increase and based on known mineral resources, we cannot sit idly by while such pro- phesies, if reasonably accurate, arc al- lowed to fulfill themselves. We cannot allow it to happen in the absence of an examination of our consumption and growth patterns to determine our re- sponse with new policies designed to meet such challenges. It Is for these reasons that I call for urgent action on the Na- tional Resouree Information Act. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent to print information on this issue in the RECORD.. There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: Approved For Release 2005/06/09 : CIA-RDP75600380R000700020001-6 May 22, 1974 Approved FDrAktimESSWANVWCW.151)PNWRHOR000700020001-6 S 8871 SELECTED U.S. MATERIALS POSITIONS Materials (and uses) Forecast annual growth in demand Percent of consume- tion imported Percent of product exported Percent of consume- tion recycled Materials (and uses) Forecast annual growth in demand Percent of consume- tion Imported Percent of product exported Percent of consume- tion recycled I. Mica (sheet) (electrical items) 7.0 100 46 0 10. Titanium, rutile (pigments, metals, 2. Platinum group '(alloys and catalysts)_ 3.0 100 24 22 ceramics) 5.0 86 1 3. Chromium 1 (alloys, compounds) Ilmenite 18.0 (a) . political or environmental uncer- Sponge 35.0 26 tainty 5.0 100 15 12 11. Asbestos (concrete, tile, abrasives, 4. Strontium .(electronic tubes, fire- work; zinc refining, ceramics) 5. Cobalt (steel alloys, chemical uses) 4.0 100 (2) 0 insulation) 12. Tin (tinplate, solders, chemical alloys) heavy reliance on overseas sources 0 85 " 63 0 nickel is substitutable 2.0 98 6