JOURNAL - OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP76M00527R000700080039-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 20, 2006
• Sequence Number: 39
• Publication Date: January 8, 1973
• Content Type: NOTES

Approved For Release 2006/09/25 : CIA-RDP76M00527R000700080039-4
Journal - Office of Legislative Counsel
Monday - 8 January 1973
Page 3
10. (Internal Use Only - LLM) Mr. Richard Schultz, Associate
Chief Counsel, House Internal Security Committee, called and said that he
and the Chief Counsel, Don Sanders, had reviewed with Chairman Ichord
the possibilities of tightening up on the Scarbeck statute through an amend-
ment to the Internal Security Act of 1950 which is under the Committee's
jurisdiction. Schultz said that while Chairman Ichord was sympathetic to
our problem, he felt that the chances for success would be better in the
context of the overall revision of the Criminal Code which is being considered
by the Judiciary Committees. I told Schultz that we, of course, value the
Chairman's advice and that our motivation in raising the matter with him was
in the interest of exploring all reasonable alternatives. (See Journal of
10 November 1972).
11. (Internal Use Only - LLM) Called Ted Kazy, House Post Office
and Civil Service Committee staff, to determine if there had been any clarifi-
cation through legislation or otherwise of the maximum rate of compensation
to consultants under 5 U. S. C. 3109. Kazy said that he was unaware of any STATINTL
action in this regard and that it was only recently that the staff became aware
of the Comptroller General's opinion. This information was relayed to 0
STATINTL
we needed some relief. ;-. s .,..
S 4. {~
Approved For Releas 8O6`/t25" CIA-RDP761M1fb0'527ROb070
Brasco (D. , N. Y.) had reintroduced his labor management bill in the Federal
service as H. R. 13. It was agreed that we would study it for its impact on the
Agency and that we would no doubt be calling upon him if it was determined that
Office of Personnel.
In response to my question, Kazy said that Representative Frank
a;J !"_ ONLY