LETTER TO THE HONORABLE EDWARD H. LEVI FROM W. E. COLBY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP77M00144R000600070011-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 20, 2012
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 26, 1975
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP77M00144R000600070011-0.pdf129.49 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/20: CIA-RDP77M00144R000600070011-0 /. goe" ? / I Zxecwive Ilz,gistry CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON,D.C. 20505 Honorable Edward H. Levi Attorney General Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Levi: 26 SEP ITI0S24, aft In my letter to you of 6 September 1975, I raised the question of the refusal of the Department of Justice to represent former employees of the Agency in the Rodney Driver, et al. v. Richard Helms, et al. case. In your letter to me of 19 September 1975, you responded by saying the Department of Justice would retain private counsel to defend Agency employees or former Agency employees but specified that this was solely in the context of the Driver case. In addition, of course, the Department of Justice has undertaken to represent Agency employees and former Agency employees in the following civil litigation matters: Bohmer v. Nixon, et al. (S.D. Cal.) (Defendants Colby, Walters, Helms and Angleton); Jane Fonda v. L. Patrick Gray, et al. (C.D. Cal.) (Defendant Colby); and Richard Bast v. Clarenc& Kelley, et al. (Defendant Colby). There is now pending another civil case, John Doe, et al. v. John McCone, et al. (N.D.C. Cal., Civil No. C-75-1211-CBR), in which the Department of Justice has not taken a position as to representation of Agency employees and former Agency employees. While there is a court-ordered stay of any action in this case, I believe the defendants are entitled to know whether the Department of Justice will represent them for the reasons 'set forth in my letter to you of 6 September 1975. The gist of the complaint is the same as that in Driver, and there is pending an application for default against three of the defendants. In recent days the Department of Justice undertook to retain private counsel for with respect to the taking of depositions by and appearances before the Senate Select Committee to Study Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. Upon learning that the Department of Justice had undertaken this action, my representatives were :100_1710 (<