LETTER TO HONORABLE JOHN O. MARSH FROM W. E. COLBY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 31, 2005
Sequence Number: 
45
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 19, 1975
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4.pdf580.53 KB
Body: 
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ,, Approved For Release $O)WlltlL- -br',,g!*RQR7 M00144R000600150W4 19 July 1975 OILC 75 1673 Honorable John O. Marsh Counsellor to the President The White House Washington, D. C. Dear Jack: As George Cary mentioned to you the other clay, we are becoming increasingly concerned over the number of House committees which, under various assertions of jurisdiction, are pressing us for information and are demanding various documents having to do with matters currently under investigation by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Operations and the Department of Justice and which, of course, will be looked into by the newly reconstituted House Select Committee on Intelligence. (I am enclosing copies of correspondence we have received from the various House committees. As I believe you. know, I am attempting to cooperate to the fullest extent possible with our regular oversight Subcommittees and with the Select Committees of the Congress in these matters. A. fractionalization of these inquiries, however, among a number of congressional committees will proliferate much sensitive information under conditions which will preclude any reasonable security control. I have made initial contact with Chairman Pike, of the new House Select Committee and hope to have further discussions with him at an early date at which time I will express the hope that he will be able to assert the jurisdiction of the Select Committee in these areas and convince his colleagues that they should defer other inquiries at least Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 until the Select Committee has completed its work and filed a report. This would not only serve to minimize the dissemination of sensitive. intelligence information, but would also eliminate duplicative efforts within the Congress and conserve the time of Executive Branch personnel who are necessarily the subjects of these inquiries. I would appreciate whatever efforts the President and you feel appropriate with the leadership of the Congress and with the Chairmen of the Committees concerned in order to assure a thorough, yet responsible, approach to this situation on the part of the Congress. George Cary will continue to keep you posted on this problem and I would appreciate your letting him know of any efforts that you feel can be exerted in this direction from the White House. Sincerely, cc: General Scowcroft Mr. Rod Hills Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - General Scowcroft 1 - Mr. Hills 1. -DCI I - DDCI 1-ER 1-OGC L--l- -- 011C OLC /G LC: jmd (19 July 1.975 2 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 V VANK CHURCH, IDAHO. CHAIRMAN JOHN G. ToW.?.N, 7e.XA9. VICE CHAIRMAN -'PHIUF 4AHY, MICH. HOWARD H. RAKER, JR.. TENN, w'.N.TE' F. MONDALE. MINN. BARRY GOLOWATER. ARR. , `' ~ ZNO}AIUONLNS ON. KY. Alojm HARD vead.k ai elealse 2005/11/21: CIA-RDP77M00144R$00600150045-4i'/" r' hit S. SCHWKER, PA. GARY HA%I COLO. SELECT COMWTTI_f1 TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS w) fl- RESPECT TO I N'C[:LLI GENCE ACTIV ITIf-.% (PURSUAH'( TO S. RES. 21. 44TH CONORS4S,) WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510E July 16, 1975 Mr. William Colby Director of Central Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Virginia Langley, Virg Dear Mr. Colby : Further review by the Select Committee has led to the identifica- tion of additional materials on the budgeting and management of intelligence programs needed in the Committee's study. Attached is a list of such materials, together with a listing of materials re- quested In earlier letters from this Committee and not yet de2.'.vered.., We have also included a,statement of general issues which have gaided selection of these requested materials, together with a set of specific questions to which written responses are needed. Accord- ingly, we would expect that materials which you deem pertinent to the listed issues and questions will be supplied, even if they have- not been specifically requested. `..[he issue statements also should. prove useful to your staff in responding to ongoing interviews by the CGS::., ttee staff. Your early response to this request wil.l be greatly appreciated in expediting the next phase of the oirinLttteG' s study. / Frank Church Chairman 1, John Tower Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 I . Sr TR7F CT - (7 tC.,!'\TI'7F1TTo r n r. --If rrrXs nR Ti, i Pi, f'r_-f'r,^Nrr^ nr .Yr~r r rr c A. Ceneral I ,3ues As one aspect of its -responsioilit;ies under S. Res. 21, th Committee will undertake a broad review of the o ,anizationai fTu nc_ tions and budgetary planning; and progrming for intelligence. The inquiry will address the following, issues: 1. Is there unnecessary duplication of expenditure and of-- fort in the collection and processing of intelligence info.li _ tion by United States agencies? 2. What is the nature and extent of Executive Branch ova:rsight on the budget, plans, and prop of intelligence activities,? 3. What should be the nature and extent; of Col esszona:l, fi- nancial oversight? For example, what budgetary info_ t_i.on should be presented to Congress on a regular basis? 1. To what degree should budget and financial data for the intelligence agencies be disclosed to the public? B. Questions on the General Issues The Committee has already received considerable into !a.t_Ion on these issues from the Central Intelligence Agency in the fo. of brief -i ngs, meetings, and documents. Hence, the Committee has only a few specific questions at present on which written responses are ex- pected. (The first three sets of questions pertain both to the max- ageria.l roles of the Director of Central Intelligence with respect to the intelligence community, and with respect to CIA.) 1. ' What is the process by which intelligence collection arid production requirements are generated? Once established, how do such requirements affect major operational and resou ce allocation decisions within the intelligence coirmuni ty, con- sidering ove:m.11 budgetary constraints? 2. What specific measures has the DCI taken In itplement.Jn- the coam pity resource management role cif the Director of Cen-- tr.-:d Intelli ence? What is the history of develorrr? ent of these manage-pent ar. angeirents? ?drat kinds of plan-i n inputs and outputs are involved? 'To Mhat extent Is the DCS and i rl - telligence community subject to an annual. 0M3 cellsing on ou u C- lays, as are other federal agencies and pro ams in :tag l_eenta- tion of the Pr.? ~ tdent's budget? What recon-Imendations has the Agency made Tir'_! h rega C~ to identifying strengths 'ar' s'F:?a!uiess `s of the DCI .r eeso u z ce zranaJement role and desi r Approved For Release. 2005/11/21 : CIA-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 Approved For Release 2005/11/21 -C?A-RDP77M00144R000600150045-4 t are the reccrrmenda11?icn n3 of of, Cent ral ?1.1.1-once with respect to such ma G Uers as organiz tIon o4 the intelligence corrn .trait ,bud ge~~ procedures, and Executive and Confessional oversight? 4. To what extent has the Central Intelligence Agency de-.- veloped, for its own programs, a pe:rfo.ance budget which.. relates proposed outlays to specific goals , measures of' ac-_ complis_hrent, and analysis of cost-effect: ven ~~s` In th1 clandestine service budget, how does top r=~~znagement assure: itself of a complete picture of covert action conducted in foreign areas and periodically assess results In tears of costs and risks? How does this process compare with t:ork managerial review of covert collection? To what, extent is the CIA's experience applicable to the intelligence c nuntty? C. Document Request In conducting its review, the Corsnittee requests the follo-Ar docur. ent s 1. The Central Intelligence Agency's 1976 budget request to the Congress. CIA budget submissions to the President for each of the years 1965-1976. 2. The Central Intelligence Agency's budgetary plhnriins : pro-- j ections for its programs in the outyears 1.977--1980, In sup port of the President's 1976 budget request. to the, Congress. The projection should include whatever bac'oip detail ha:;: been: developed -- e.g., by program activity, ; ,eog4 r phic area, cover,: action, covert collection, etc. 3. Intelligence Resources Advisory Ccrrmi_ttee (IR411C) planning documents, produced in each of the years since 1972, shQIing past, current, and future budget outlays for proems of the U.S. intelligence community. 4. The annual Consolidated Intelligence Budget for the years since 1972, and any similar documents pro uced in the 1963-1972 period by such agencies as the National. Tiil;ellig.-~nceIResources Board (TMIB) and the National Intelligence t'~ ag i t Eva? r aIon (NIPE) staff. - 5. The 1976 budget allowance letter to the flCI ..,row. Cz?t. sne.- cifyin g dollar and manpower ceil:ir?,-;s ura".1 ty p: ograms. Any similar docu ri.en s imso s: r!_ t. ~::k ~l. 'i C > 4cl yn ti