(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-01617A006000050027-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Sequence Number: 
27
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
SUMMARY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-01617A006000050027-7.pdf216.19 KB
Body: 
Approved For f late Dept. declassification 8< release instructions on file GENERAL UK Foreign office "warning" to Sweden that if the Swedes per- might sist in following their present neutrality policy the British have to reconsider their policy vis-a-vis Sweden. According to the British Ambassador, the UK Foreign mice rejected Swed- ish arguments for neutrality by stating that., (a) no part of Europe could escape participation in a future -war; (ti) Scandinavia would not be merely a "subsidiary theater of war;' (c) the Swedish conclusion is "premature" that help would not reach Scandinavia in time to be effective; and (d) prior strategic preparations are emphatically important. in tockholrr has learn British Ambassador of a 1. UK presses Sweden on neu' li issue--}US Ambassador Matthews that the 'strategic advantages resulting from Italy's adherence to the Brussels Pact would outweigh the disadvantages. The British believe that although Icy would be a military liability, the availability of Italian bases to the western European union powers and their denial to a potential enemy are of "prime importance." Embassy London, the ritts arms services chiefs consider 2..British view of Italy's stra c position--.According to US 'Document No. 6 after havinx first voted affirmattwly the USSR resolut 3. US2osttion regard US UK co rationn on Palestine--The Department of State e has Info ei A s `o o glas, in response to his recent reports concerning Bevin's hopes for increasing US -UK collaboration on the Palestine question, that the US is fully aware of the need to work with and not against the UK, although the mutual task would have been easier if the British had not been eremely-laard in dealing with a crisis largely of their win making. Drruglas is authorized to tell Bev$n that the US will not lift the arms embargo ex- cept in conjunction' with Security Council "action or inaction." The Department indicates that the US is prepared: (a) to sup- port 'the, Ui4 cease-fire resolution with, certain modifications, NO CHANGE in Class.; ^ DECLASSIFIED Date :1-4 MAR 1978 By: 0 Class. CH~~:<