BI-WEEKLY PROPAGANDA GUIDANCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-03061A000100010012-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 23, 1998
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 14, 1959
Content Type: 
PERRPT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-03061A000100010012-8.pdf441.92 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/03/03 ' CIA-RDP78-03061 A960100010012-8 14 September 1959 Approved For Release 2007/03/03: CIA-RDP78-03061AO00100010012-8 Approved For R Ceele ase 20 133., The Great Leap Backward 1959 78-03061 AODO 100010012-8 The cb munique of the Eighth Plenary SScasioon of the CCE Central Committee reportedly, heat in Lushan. .Kisn, si from 2 to l6. August was made public on Z August. The co n unique a4mlts to i4ncompeteaat planning, erroneous statistics and weaknesses in the economy. It propoises l-arge scale retrenchment in econornic planning for 1959, admitting, for example, that 1958 go ;la for grain. production were too high by 3516. It adds that co. sid rab1e oppo ai.ti.on to the c nirnune system still exists in China in the torn of -"right opportunist ideas" which "overernphast the seriousness of certain defects which -xcurred in the `great leap forward' and its cox mune mo re nents. " TThis charge appears to have been directed not only at cadres on the working level, but at elements of top leadership and gives evidence of dissension within China"* ruling hierarchy. Finally, the communique demands that the party o}rercome rightist tendencies. "put politics in command, fully mobilize the manses, go all out, and .trive.to fulfill and overfulfill this years leap forward p"inn." Although there is evidence that the Chinese Communist economy is badly it need of adjustment and. althougb planning and production errors promise untold hardships for the Chinese people, there is no present evidence that the economy is a failure or is likely to founder be ause of admitted errors. 25X1 Approved For Release 2007/03/03: CIA-RDP78-03061AO00100010012-8 14 September 1959 Approved For Release 20 DP78-03061A00 100010012-8 .134. Interniationai Development Association s zscre+aised monetary stabil$ty ha-s opened the possibility of more extensive European Participation in long term lending to underdeveloped countries. The creation of IDA will shift some of the available European funds into long term loans. 25X1 the meeting of the Governors of.the World Bank in '% ashington in late September. Multilateral aid extended through international organizations is highly appealing to underdeveloped countriesi since it avoids the political overtones implicit in bilateral aid. The existing organization, the IBED, makes loans only for economically sound projects and requires repayment in hard currencies. Since the underdeveloped countries need large amounts of capital and find it difficult to borrow money on "bankers terms". it has long been desirable to create an international institution which would fill this gap. In 1949 a Special. United Nations Fund for Economic Development (SUNFED) was proposal which would provide low interest, long term loans for development purposes. Although supported by many.of the underdeveloped countries, some of Western Europe, and the Soviet bloc, the U.S. and the U.K. have consistently, opposed it. It is feared that SUNFE would not provide adequate control over the use of money and that the U. S. Congress would not support a rneaatngful U. S. ,contribution. IDA, which would be administered by the World Bank and not the UN, is designed to assure a more effectively administered method. of providing cheap development loans allowing long term repayment* partially in soft currencies and lour tntervat rates. During late 195.7 and 1958, the . leveling' out of the 'world's economic activity has temporarily shifted the U. S. balance of payments to a debtor, position. There has bean 'a resulting gold flow to Europe which has considerably strengthened the current dollar and. gold reserves of the European countries Thi t The United States Government will propose the creation of a new internatio a1 town agency, to be known as the international Development Association (IDA), during Approved For Release 2007/03/03: CIA-RDP78-03061AO00100010012-8 Approved For Re ase 2007 135. Crisis its Sino-Lrdian .Relations 3061A b $195 iens#On between India and tle Chinese Peoples Republic (CPR) has inure: se slmad'l's race the Tibetan, revolt in March 1959. The Chicoms have declared Ir diasi and 7 tbetan currency illegal in Tibet. harrassed Indian traders and "firms s ; t A"_ Indian pilgrims stay out of Tibet. All actions are violations of the 1954 trade agreement ? between India and the CPR. Reports that Chicom troops were massing on the Bhutan border coupled with propaganda statements emanating from Lhasa that the Bhutanese, Sikkimese and Ladakhis ""must again be made a united family under China" -hr aught forth Prime Minister Nehru's statement that India would defend Bhutan and Sikkim against invasion. On 25 August a detachment of Chicom soldiers invaded the Subansiri Division of the Northeast Frontier Agency (NEFA) and captured. the Indian post at Longju. Nehru'- angry reaction to this incursion followed bar the announcement that Indian defense forces would man the entire border was received enthusiastically by the Indian people. On ? September Nehru submitted to Parliament a white paper revealing the deterioration of relations between India and the C} R since 1954 despite the facade of friendly coexistence during this period. Chicom border violations relate to Chicom' 'Icartographic aggression'. wherein 30, 000 square rniles.of Indian territory are shown as 'elonging to the CPR. India has officially protested the .inaccuracy of the Chacom maps. The McMahon Line is firmly recognized by India as the border between Tibet and India. The CPR has never formally ratified the agreement (1914) establishing the Line. However. Nehru stated that when Chou .En-Lai visited India in 1954, he had given Nehru to understand that he agreed to the Line. Border incidents along the Himalayan frontier have been occurring for the past nine years and probably have been intensified at then tune because the CPR wishes to prevent Indian Influence in Tibet. The CPR's evasiveness and bellicosity in settling border disputes is illustrated by her negotiations with Burma and her 4 September note to Nehru denying Chicorn aggression in NEFA and accusing India of a border violation in the same area. India"*' current problems with the CPR on the northern frontier may encourage India and Pakistan to adjust their outstanding differences, most important of which are the kCashmir and Indus waters disputes. 25X1 Approved For Release 2007/03/03: CIA-RDP78-03061AO00100010012-8 Approved For Release 136. European Cooperation and Integration `14 September 1959 78-03061 A000100010012-8 The Post-World War II movement towards the integration of Europe has culminated in the formation of the European Economic Community (EEC) and the associated Coal and Steel Community (CSC) and EURATOM. Recent developments on the European scene have revealed the fragility of these organizations before the forces of nationalism. The CSC has been faced with the task of resolving the coal glut in Europe. Its High Authority recommended that production controls be established and import quotas be fixed to relieve the pressures from excess coal production which was particularly serious In Belgium where lags in closing down unprofitable mines contribute to overproduction. This recommendation of the High Authority was turned down by the CSC Council primarily at the instigation of the French and Germans. Although there would have been technical difficulties in enforcing the High Authority's recommendations and although a general program of controls is contrary to the advantages of a free market, the decision was a distinct setback to the cause of European integration. The smaller countries fear this is an example of a growing tendency for the submergence of their interest to those of the larger countries. The Ruhr industrialists are not particular enthusiastic about the Common Market (EEC). siding with the general position of Erhard that a larger free trade area with less supranational overtones would be superior. Adenauer continues. ardently to favor integration. The French, returning to their traditional nationalism, are somewhat equivocal over the Common Market. The French Premier Debre has long been an opponent of the integrationist movement. The final factor is the formation of the grouping known as the Cuter Seven: the UK, the three Scandinavian countries, Portugal, Switzerland, and Austria. This group hopes to associate itself with the Common Market through some form of Free' Trade Area. Such proposals were previously rejected by the French, who have little to lose economically by the exclusion of the Outer Seven. The Germans on the other hand, have extensive economic interests with the Seven and there is considerable pressure for arriving at soar: satisfactory relationship between the two groupings. 25X1 Approved For Release 2007/03/03: CIA-R?P78-03061A000100010012-8 Approved For Re F lease 2007/03/03: CIA-RDP78-03061A0.P01000'I _6- 1959 137. The CENTO Ministerial Council Meeting Athree-day meeting of the Central Treaty Organization Ministerial Council (CENTO officially became the new' name of the Baghdad Pact on 19 August 1959) will open in Washington on 7 October. The Council Meeting--scheduled at the January 1959 Ministerial Council meeting in Karachi, long before the Eisenhower-Khrushchev exchange visits were arranged--will occur between Khrushchev?s visit to the U. S. and Eisenhower?s return visit to the Soviet Union, probably to commence the second or third week of October. It is possible that the CENTO Council meeting might be interpreted in Moscow and elsewhere as a U. S. manifestation of the "position of strength" policy which Communist propaganda for many years has condemned as the principal deterrent to an easing of Cold War tensions. The Baghdad Pact, an outgrowth ? of the 244 February 1955 Turkish-Iraqi Treaty of Mutual Cooperation, has been a major target of Communist propaganda against those aspects of U. S. foreign policy manifested by overseas military bases and military pacts such as NATO and SEATO. Moscow?s decrease in propaganda against the Baghdad Pact-CENTO nations following Iraq's withdrawal from the Pact in no way implies any diminution in its antipathy toward such pacts. Four of the five original member nations--Turkey, Iraq. Iran and Pakistan--comprised the "norther tier"of nations defensively arrayed against possible Soviet military aggression. Iraq's withdrawal following Quasimas 1958 coup d?etat resulted in the transfer of the organization's headquarters to Ankara. Great Britain is the only non-Middle East nation with membership in CENTO, The U. S. while not a member, participates in three of CENTO?s four committees, notably the military, economic, and counter eubver#ion committees. The U. S. also provides some personnel for the international staff. In addition to military aid, the U. S. has provided $27, 67 million to various economic projects sponsored by the organisation. Despite considerable pressures from CENTO memberre the U. S. does not intend to join CENTO because the Middle East Doctrine and bilateral pacts with the Middle East members of CENTO afford all the U. S. support that formal U. S. membership would provide. CENTO in its military aspects, has a senior planning staff, but there is no unified command structure as in NATO. The agenda for the Ministerial Council meeting has not been announced, but is not expected to feature other than normi4xi CENTO economic, and military affairs. ;t y lity. Approved For Release 2007/03/03: CIA-RDP78-03061A000100010012-8