RATIONALE IN SUPPORT OF THE AGENCY'S RETIREMENT POLICY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-03091A000200020015-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 27, 2000
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 16, 1968
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-03091A000200020015-0.pdf142.52 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/28. ` 1A- DP78-03091 000200020015-0 16 April 1968 SUBJECT : Rationale in Support of the Agency's Retirement Policy 1. I am not yet satisfied that we have the kind of statement on rationale which we need to support retirement at age sixty, to which we generally subscribe. I believe that our rationale paper should answer at least the following questions. I also believe that if it answers these questions adequately, it should be good enough to support the policy. The questions are: a. Why does CIA generally have to be young and expect and require its people to retire earlier than normally required by the Government in general and earlier than required by law for the systems in which we participate? (I think your state- ment and several others answer this question fairly well. ) b. Why is it that we adopt the same mandatory retirement age for the Civil Service System and for the CIA System? Why couldn't people who are serving under the Civil Service System serve longer than those under the CIA System ? Since we do have two systems we must rationalize the establishment of an upper limit of age sixty for both. c. Why don't we make exceptions to the general policy for individual career services or selected groups or occupa- tional categories? Why is it that we feel ORR. or Logistics personnel must retire at age sixty? Why don't we recognize printing and reproduction employees as a category, or chauf- feurs or receptionists or some others? 2. I think the first two questions can be answered affirmatively. I suspect the third question may have to be answered by recognizing Approved For Release 2000/08/28 : CIA-RDP78-03091A00020002Q015 S xa 25X1A SEVET Approved For Releas000/08/28 : CIA-RDP78-0309110200020015-0 the varying degrees in which the policy applies and by concluding that it would be extremely difficult to administer a system with a long list of exceptions. I think you can also argue that the tempo of the Agency must be geared to a single pace and that the flexi- bility which we must attempt to maintain would have to be handled on an individual case basis. L. K. White Executive Director -Comptroller 25X1A Approved For Release 2000/08/28 CIA-RDP78-03091A000200020015-0 Approved For Relea 2000/08/28 : CIA-RDP78-03091MOO200020015-0 e', -;t:, Approved For Release 2000/08/28 : CIA-RDP78-03091A000200020015-0