CONTRACT NO.: T.O. 36-1340-O

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-03424A001200130002-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: February 22, 2012
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: February 9, 1961
• Content Type: MEMO

Declassified gin Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/22 : CIA-RDP78-03424A001200130002-4
D00 ~ REV DATE 0~~ ~`= By _~6 J6 7A%- ORIO COMP opt C~ Q G T
ORIO OU133 -PAGES REtI CLASS w~ 1
JUST - NEXT RET AUTH' HR 7E?2 (`I`
ONF
I di IA L
TO: Inspection Branch/PD/OL DATE: 9 February 1961
1
CONTRACT NO.: J.A.
~
616-1VO-0
PR A Chiefs =agineering staff, OC REPORT NO.: FINAL ?
If final, so state
Contractor
Address
Commodity/Service Am Ado A? _ei,nn Classification
No. of Prototypes _21 asah Contract Completion Date: November 1960
The Contractor is on schedule x Yes No
The Contractor will remain with his allocated funds Yes No
An extension of time will be necessary Yes X No
All phases of the technical progress are satisfactory Yea 7t No
The overall performance of this contractor is: Q Satisfactory
? Subject to Improvement
0 Unsatisfactory
NOTE: If unsatisfactory or subject to improvement, indicate reasons under
comments
the ooatnaator me delivered all 23 Antennas as recnirel un er this
Comments .ti- 2ho mW sbi:p eYhibitel in the eee.true ioa/fabrioatioa of the
antenna is of poor halite. In order to espetite shipwat of the
antennas to t e fiel+dt the *4D lab will pertora the aoaessary r of
the antennas. Ca 13 Jawmy 1361 the coatYaator w advised of
Recommended Action !{.,~4~.tw this n retract.
Agency's tissatisfaatioa of the poor v9stm nship?
Date of Visit to Contractor's Plant ilk
Inspected by:
ONF DEN SAL
Division: 0"hwi-IR
Extension:
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/22 : CIA-RDP78-03424A001200130002-4