WE HAVE JUST COMPLETED A THOROUGH REVIEW OF ALL FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SELECTION OF A SUITABLE WHEEL DIAMETER FOR THE MODEL 1 BLOWER.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 18, 2012
Sequence Number: 
36
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1.pdf344.15 KB
Body: 
I Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/09/18 : CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1 v./A / r- I \-1 r, , ?, ? I -1 Dear Sir: , We have just completed a thorough review of all factors influ- (encing the selection of a suitable wheel diameter for the Model 1 blower) In view of your impending visit here on February 27,.we are summarizing our findings in this letter, to aid in the discussion of blower per- formance, power requirements, and the associated burning rates. Information on motors and switch gear for 50/60-cycle operation is not included, but will be discussed on February. 27. From the data shown in Table 1, we believe that a 15-1/2-inch wheel diameter is an excellent choice for this application. It meets all of the power requirements and maintains the desired burning rate, except for an 'estimated reduction of 5 per cent in burning rate at the 50-cycle i speed when a long stack is used. A wheel diameter larger than 15-1/2 inch would require a motor larger than 7.5 hp for 60-cycle operation (in addition to good 50-cycle operation). This 5 per cent reduction in burning rate can be avoided if the diameter of a long stack is increased to about 24 inches to reduce gas velocity and pressure drop. The "long stack" assumed for this calculation would be equivalent to about 160 feet of straight, round: pipe of 16-inch diameter, or 50 ft of pipe with four 45-degree elboris and three 90-degree elbows, similar to that installed on your first Model 2 unit. The short stack used for the calculations is a straight length of 16-inch- a- OR ? -----:.- TYPE 0 ir 1 ORIG CLASS 41____ PAGES _7- REV CLASS (-1 AUTHI MI 184 JUST ?----- NEXT REV - Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/09/18: CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1 Declassified and Approved ForRelease2012/09/18 : CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1 -2- diameter pipe, 6 feet long. Of course, intermediate lengths of stack would result in intermediate burning rates between +3 per cent and -5 per cent A of normal for 16-inch-diameter stacks. A 21 foot length of straight 16-inch pipe has the same flow resistance as one 90-degree elbow. The term,:..normal burning rate, in Table 1 represents the average rate from past experience with the second Model 1 unit for the 60-cycle, 5500 rpm blower with the 14-1/2-inch-diameter wheel. The average rate depends upon the type of paper, of course, but it is assumed that any variation of air flow will result in a proportionate'variation in burning rate, regardless of paper type. Barometric pressure, altitude, and air temperature affect air density which, in turn, influences air flow, pressure, and power require- ments of any blower. It was decided that burning rates would be based on blower performance with air at 80 F and at .a barometric pressure normal for 1000 ft altitude. Suitable corrections were applied to experimental data and to the data supplied by the blower manufacturer to convert all data to this base condition. Experimental burning rates were obtained under essentially these conditions. turther information on the effect of much higher altitudes will be discussed on February 27. Figure 1 is a set of curves showing the relation of blower horsepower and static pressure to flow rate and to flow resistance of the incinerator and stack. The upper curves show the relation of horsepower to flow rate for three wheel diameters at 50- and 60-cycle motor speeds. The intermediate curves show the relation of static pressure to flow from Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/09/18 : CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1 "17 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/09/18: CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1 varies directly as the air mass flow rate. This assumption has not been verified experimentally, but is reasonably accurate over the narrow range of interest here. All of the values in Table 1 were obtained from Figure 1. As you can see by study of Figure 1, if the blower is to be mounted on the motor shaft and driven at synchronous speed, increasing wheel diameter increases power consumption and flow rate. To eliminate the 5 per cent reduction of burning rate under the worst condition a slightly larger blower wheel and considered for 50-cycle operation would require use of.a larger motor to cover the power requirements for 60-cycle operation. We believe that it may be preferable to use a stack of larger diameter and low flow resistance for those few marginal installations where the 5_per cent reduction in burning rate may occur, and where it is undesirable. r Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/99/18: CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036-1 pRAF-c 74 ;LE: . 0 45/1 A/M/ . R475 Declassified I I and Approved ( -, , 4.A/D I For . POWEV:?. I Release ' * 1 r-----4..,...,.._ 2012/09/18: REG1U/REEN7S 4 P r ? CIA-RDP78-03642A001600040036--1 - - - - 1 I ( 1-- ) n ? . . .. c . . . . 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111 nche r ; . a fr, 64)0,4 skPri f Rro,Derls.. st?ck ei x i hi u a6 re/Aocae.,1 /s? e/d As exeee- ? )? )3 kil hp, ?erly, i .6;?lec, 144 ? Mo Mc; fir, ,870 er- fr- er ,71-Deed7/ r.t.* olDere://rly. Is eise,/ cgif)4/0 Ina/ wA; a/ o is eis /s e. i4' o Aee../ diame 7 tie? , , cAon,es; scin e 4hopie/ailifer. doryeri 4 doeis ralio ei 4...),/ aii4/ ni;),7 evinel) y , rit3h1 tiolver s. see procedure eviieh is qt nol r) a../Aen dem-)loer 7,-, wAe.t.) dmiloer- aloes et-- , ,ye/es 1 pow co+ehol 4Aer is s ,sAck.* /A e, m exece /o is /07 no7 :. 1.5--fr:/67 ' 6 o 35bo 59 2900 6o 3 0 50 P900 6o 3' 5-o o Bzirnif- dlhiper g=""201'1,7 Rale VD ch..-ilc. 0 1-13 +3 3 Bier Power hp 6.7 -73 6,8 6.E3 Ogpe SeiliT N. 2 3 . 3 5 ezernong gat< '70c6r2ge -74 3 -/-.- 3 5- 5' Slower, Dap er Power. Seti-ini hp Ho. 4:8 3 .5-.6 .5 . 674 3 . -,? - - T - ' Lt ?, Bqrnin9 Rare %chglye -74 3 i /-3 7L3 I . .1-` 3 Blown^ Power hp ? 8,6 c.6 8.6, 8. Dail:per Seriv AA. I Z 2 Barrenly Rate % chauf -1- /3 74^ 3 1- 3 ? Eskuier Power hp 6.7 -73 6. 8 6.6 .04m.per* thirvoinj Self/n*9 Rate A/0 % 114 er -25 -26" -2S 3-2s " Blowd, Denc volt Powee Seti-M..1 hi ND . ei, ??(c) 9.6 ??) (Q) 8.4 (S',6 0 Norrnol st4c1- Q.)