CONDITIONS IN PAYROLL BRANCH, FISCAL DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP78-04718A002000260001-2
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
8
Document Creation Date:
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
November 12, 1998
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
October 2, 1956
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP78-04718A002000260001-2.pdf | 718.47 KB |
Body:
14118A002000260001ar
,OCT 2 i9 6
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director (Support)
SUBJECT : Conditions in Payroll Branch, Fiscal Division, Office of the
Comptroller
1. On September 18 the Inspector General received an anonymous letter,
addressed to him by name and title, alleging a seriously deteriorating situation
in the Payroll Branch, Fiscal Division. This letter alleged among other things
that personnel were being driven to the point of exhaustion, that overtime was
excessive, that unsound changes were being made in basic procedures, that morale
was terrible, and that most personnel were seeking to escape through resignation
or reassignment. The letter concluded with an indication that Congress would
probably be informed of these "slave conditions" unless some changes were made.
2. Knowledge of conditions in the Comptroller's Office already in the
possession of this Staff, plus the evident sincerity of the complaining letter,
resulted in an immediate spot investigation of conditions in the Payroll Branch.
This investigation included personal interviews with all personnel in the Branch
present for duty, discussions with the Chief of the Fiscal Division, with the
Acting Comptroller, and with representatives of the Management Staff familiar
with the area. Reference was also made to the earlier Inspector General's Survey
of the Comptroller's Office and to last year's Management Staff report on the
Fiscal Division.
3. This investigation revealed a substantial basis for many of the allega-
tions contained in the letter of September 18. The conditions uncovered are
discussed in detail below. Specific recommendations for the correction of
deficiencies are set forth at the conclusion of this memorandum.
DISCUSSION
A. The Payroll Branch by its very nature has a number of inherent problems
which will always have some adverse effect on morale. The impact of these factors
will vary according to the quality of supervision, but will always be present to
some degree. Among these factors are:
1. Low Grade Structure
The Payroll Branch has a T/0 of 25. Of these, 17 are GS-5's or
below. A Wage and Classification audit made as a result of the IG's survey
of the Comptroller's Office in 195+ resulted in the upgrading of four super-
visory positions. These upgradings have provided some additional incentive.
However, the fact remains that the personnel of Payroll Branch are predomi-
nantly limited to GS-5 positions. This low grade is particularly hard on
several married men with families recruited into the Branch during the past
Approved For Release 2000/0 x,~ ~
4 8 G*1 ( 00j2 0001- 01
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 : CIA 8-04718AO02000260001-2
The work in the Payroll' Branch consists of an endless two week
2. Routine Work
cycle of auditing and posting information from T&A's, hatching T&A cards
according to type, processing personnel changes, and other related routine
operations repeated endlessly upon thousands of similar accounts. At
first there may be some challenge in learning the intricacies of the work,
but for the more intelligent an onerous routine soon develops. In a sense
this problem will become more acute as the Agency completes a full change-
over from the manual system of computing pay to an exclusively machine
system. Several personnel who were well satisfied with the manual type of
payroll work are seeking transfers to escape from what is characterized as
the drudgery of feeding machines.
3. Limited Opportunity for Advancement
Payroll work does not particularly equip one for advancement into
other areas of responsibility. It is essentially an operation within itself
and once one has been tagged as a payroll clerk it is difficult to obtain
broader assignments or advancement elsewhere in the Agency. The chronic
shortage of personnel in the Branch contributes to the difficulty of ob-
taining assignments elsewhere because supervisors are understandably re-
luctant to release personnel without suitable replacements. At the present
time there are five people in the Payroll Branch seeking assignments else-
where in the Agency without much prospect of success.
4. Inexorable Deadlines
It is a simple fact that the Agency expects to be paid on time
every other Friday. No failure to meet a deadline would create more havoc
than a failure on the part of the Payroll Branch. The personnel, especially
the more conscientious, operate continuously under the pressure of this
deadline. No excuses justify failure. At the present time the Branch is
operating at 80 per cent of capacity with the prospect of losing several
more individuals without replacement in the near future. New personnel
take time to train. When the Branch is consistently under strength, little
time to train new people is available and increasingly the full burden of
meeting deadlines falls upon the few old hands. In addition, there are
seasonal influxes of summer employees, there are changes in bond deduction
procedures, there are retroactive pay increases, and in fact there are always
additional problems thrust upon the Branch which must be dealt with within
the inexorable two week deadline. Some employees are not temperamentally
suited for pressure of this nature and undoubtedly some loss in personnel
stems from this factor.
5. Inordinate Turnover
At the present time, only 20 of the authorized T/0 of 25 are on
board in the Branch, not counting usual absences for leave and sickness.
Three of these are resigning, one is going on maternity leave, and five
others are seeking reassignment. Since the first of the year, 13 other
individuals have left the Branch either through reassignment or resignation.
Approved For Release 2000/04/20: CIA-RDP78-0 c7ON$ 9239P 60001-2
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 ? CI~ -04718,6993000260001-2
This constitutes an inordinate turnover which seriously affects the ability
of the Branch to perform its mission. The work of the Branch, though not
overwhelmingly difficult, nevertheless requires considerable time in which
to develop sufficient proficiency to handle the large volume of work expected.
Furthermore, this inordinate turnover increases the burden both in mental
strain and in physical overtime on the few individuals who constitute the
hard core of the Branch.
B. In addition to the foregoing morale problems generally characteristic of
most payroll units, the Payroll Branch in this Agency faces two additional problems
resulting from its unusual and secret responsibilities.
1. Recruiting Difficulties
Surprisingly enough, there are some individuals who by temperament
and interest are favorably disposed to payroll work. These individuals are
not large in number but happily they do exist, usually among the ranks of
the older working women. The backbone of the present Payroll Branch is
composed of about five such women, some of whom have been with the Agency
and its predecessors since 191+5. The goal of recruiting should, of course,
be to obtain as many of these individuals as possible. Unfortunately there
are several obstacles to realizing this objective. For one thing, there is
the delay in security processing which often means that an individual
specially recruited for payroll work will find and take another Job of a
similar nature before his clearance is approved. This means that the Pay-
roll Branch is forced to take many individuals from the Clerical Pool whose
aptitude and interest in payroll work are low. Furthermore, many of these
clerk-typists were drawn to the Agency by the lure of intelligence and the
prospects of overseas duty. When individuals of this nature find themselves
assigned to the Payroll Branch they frequently become disaffected and resign.
One resignation occurred during the course of the investigation for
precisely this reason. The individual concerned was an attractive young
woman from California with over two years of college and a background in
technical writing. Placing her in Payroll Branch, though perhaps under-
standable because of the personnel shortage, was nevertheless an extreme
case of misassignment as she resigned from the Agency within 90 days
seriously disaffected. In a DD/P area division she probably would have
been a happy and contented employee. The Agency cannot afford repeated
instances of such misassignment. The solution requires greater coordina-
tion between the Comptroller and the Director of Personnel to insure that
the Payroll Branch is given a legitimate opportunity to obtain from the
Pool those individuals who by temperament and background are most apt to
adjust to payroll type work. The problem is acute for there are only eight
people out of an authorized strength of 25 who are reasonably content in
the present Payroll Branch. Unless recruiting is intensified and more
properly directed, the Branch is faced with an insoluble personnel problem.
3 _ CONFIDENTI
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 O4718A002000260001-2
Approved For Release 2000/l 4718A2
2. Lack of Agency Administrative Discipline
In addition to its other problems, the Payroll Branch is to a large
extent at the mercy of unit T&A clerks throughout the Agency. Payroll pro-
cedures require that all T&A's be received in the Payroll Branch by 3:00 p.m.
on the Monday immediately following a Friday payday. In addition, if the
Branch is to expeditiously process and post the information from the T&A's,
such information must be accurate and entered according to standard in-
structions. Errors in T&A's require the payroll clerks to go through a
time-consuming process of checking back with the originating component in
order to correct the T&A's and insure that personnel are properly paid.
It is an undeniable fact that in this Agency, T&A's are frequently late
and characterized by widespread errors and omissions. The Management Staff
report issued in the summer of 1955, pointed out this deficiency in detail
and further concluded that the efforts to institute machine posting of leave
data in the summer of 1955 failed primarily because errors in the T&A's were
so widespread and frequent that an unacceptable amount of time had to be
devoted to manual corrections.
The Chief of the Payroll Branch considers his number one problem to
be the inaccuracies in the T&A's and the failure of Agency administrative
personnel generally to adhere to the provisions of applicable regulations.
He further complains that existing regulatory issuances, particularly Tenta-
tive Regulation 20-650, are vague and imprecise, and that his efforts to
tighten administrative procedures have been unsuccessful. In this area of
administrative efficiency the Agency compares in a markedly unfavorable way
to the FBI. Much of the success and low cost obtained by the FBI in its
payroll procedures stems from the tight discipline within that organization.
This is not discipline purely for the sake of regimentation but discipline
aimed at making the work of all individuals easier. Agency efforts to date
to obtain greater accuracy and promptness in the submission of T&A's have
been unsatisfactory. The Payroll Branch suffers as a consequence and is,
of course, personally powerless to correct the situation.
C. The foregoing paragraphs point out problems generally characteristic
of the Payroll Branch in CIA. Taken as a whole, they are serious and require
corrective action. However, they are not in themselves the sole cause for the
recent demoralizing and chaotic period which among other things led to the
September 18 letter of complaint. The cumulative effect of these generally
recognized factors set the stage, but it required a serious supervisory error
to precipitate the demoralizing conditions uncovered in this investigation.
1. For the past several years the Office of the Comptroller, in
collaboration with the Management Staff, has been giving serious thought
and study to changing the Agency vouchered payroll system from a manual
"exception" basis to a machine "computation" basis. Studies have been
prepared and consultations held with other Government agencies, notably
the FBI, the Navy Department and the General Accounting Office. In April
of this year a staff study was submitted to the Comptroller recommending
the introduction of the computation system. The study not only recommended
the introduction of the computation system but also called for the transfer
of the Payroll Branch from Fiscal Division to the Machine Records Division.
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 : CIA-RDP78-0471
001-2
Approved For Release 2000/04/20: CIA-RDP78-0471 8901 -2
Introduction of the computation system was apparently approved but
decision on the physical transfer of the Payroll Branch was withheld
pending a trial of the computation system.
2. At approximately the same time, because of continuing low morale
in the Payroll Branch, a new Branch Chief was recruited from the Machine
Records Division. This new Branch Chief took over in May 1956, and in
June, under his direction, the computation system was instituted. The
personnel of the Branch were divided on the desirability of the change
but in general were willing to go along with the computation system as
such. However, the change to the computation system was accompanied by a
further and more drastic change to a functionalized breakdown of duties
within the Payroll Branch. Prior to that time, each payroll clerk was
assigned a vouchered area or block of payroll cards for which he or she
was solely responsible including all processing from the receipt of T&A's
through final posting. This was known as the block system and gave each
payroll clerk a goal and a sense of responsibility and pride in the successful
administration of a particular segment of the total Agency payroll. The
functionalized system, however, was predicated on the belief that every
individual performs a particular phase of the payroll procedure more ef-
ficiently than some other segment of the procedure. The object therefore
of the functionalized system was to have those clerks who audited fastest
do all the auditing; those who filed fastest do all the filing; those who
operated adding machines most efficiently do all the adding. The intro-
duction of this functionalized system completely demoralized the Branch.
Not one of the 19 individuals interviewed, other than the Branch Chief,
had anything good to say about the functionalized system. In fact, without
exception they blamed the effort to introduce this system for the recent
chaos in the payroll system, for the excessive low morale, and for most of
the other troubles of the Branch.
3. These troubles proved to be numerous. For one thing, under the
functionalized system no one person was responsible for a given block of
accounts and therefore no one was able to answer inquiries with arrassurance.
The vouchered payroll of the Agency became a sort of grab bag with each
clerk doing a piece here and a piece there. Pride in work was destroyed
and in its place bickering and complaining about who was doing the most
work became common.
11. Even more serious was the excessive overtime imposed on the Branch
in an effort to make the system work. Since July 1 the Branch has worked
1,440 hours of overtime. This is over 16 per cent of the total working
time of the Branch. Furthermore, this additional workload was not carried
by all personnel of the Branch equally. Five of the Branch personnel
present for duty worked little or no overtime mostly for good and sufficient
reasons. The remaining 15 had to carry the entire load. The amount of over-
time worked by some of these individuals is staggering. One woman worked
149 hours of overtime in this three month period. Six others worked in
excess of 100 hours of overtime in the same period. There is no question
but that this onerous overtime resulted in frayed nerves and overwrought
personnel.
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 : CA-RD~P78-0471001-2
:Approved For Release 2000/04/20 TlAMDff78-04718W6&f?4a2SQ1-2
5. It is true that overtime was placed on a voluntary basis and that
no one was verbally pressured to contribute to the overtime work. However,
when the work is there and must be done the conscientious employee feels a
compulsion to do it. Within payroll Branch the pressures of the work and
the inexorable deadlines compelled the performance of overtime. In the
face of such conditions it is specious to say that overtime is on a "volun-
tary" basis. Some individuals appreciate some overtime as a means of earning
more money; however within Payroll Branch some of the most conscientious
employees, including section chiefs, worked themselves to near exhaustion.
6. Furthermore, the inability of the payroll clerks to deal effectively
with telephone requests for information added to the sense of frustration
induced by the functional system. Many people expressed the belief that
some recent resignations for "personal reasons" really had their source in
the confusion and demoralization associated with the functional system. As
an example, one of the most hard working and capable of the supervisory
personnel in the Branch has submitted her resignation effective October 20.
She states as her reason that she must drive her son, who is an Agency em-
ployee with a badly damaged heart, to work. Since she does not have a
parking space she must leave home at 6:00 a.m. the morning in order
Care-
him to work and then secure a parking place along
ful discussion with this employee revealed that she has no other job and
will have to find one when she leaves the Agency. She loves payroll work,
has two sons in the Agency and basically does not want to leave. However,
she is overworked and distraught by conditions and feels that only a resigna-
tion will solve her problem. Her loss will be a serious blow to the Branch
and the reasons behind this resignation are certainly not consistent with
the Agency's repeatedly expressed interest in the welfare of its people.
This may well be a case where a parking space should be provided for com-
passionate reasons. If this personal problem is solved it will probably save
a valuable employee for the Agency and will in addition have a very healthy
effect on morale in the Branch generally.
7. The Branch Chief recruited from Machine Records Division in May,
cannot be held primarily responsible for the chaos created by the functional
system which he introduced. He is a young GS-9 whose entire experience lay
in the machine records area. He viewed the problems of the Payroll Branch,
at least initially, in terms of his previous experience and to him such
experience indicated that the functional system had much to offer in in-
creased efficiency. He may have also felt that the decision to introduce
the computation method of payroll tabulating inferred introduction of the
functional division of work as well, although the two by no means follow.
Inquiries indicate that the Management Staff, though favoring the computa-
tion method of tabulating payrolls, is opposed to a functionalized. division
of work. The Management Staff further advised that not even the FBI with
all its efficiency and discipline has undertaken a functional division of
work because of its adverse effect on the morale of the payroll clerks.
8. Even though the personnel in the Branch opposed the Branch Chief's
decision to introduce the functionalized division of work, many of them
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 : Cl -RDP78-0qpG2__. mM60001-2
Opa IQ
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 . - DP78-0471WOM"0001-2
nonetheless sense his sincerity and determination and feel that he has
opera-
the makings of a good Chief once he has learned more about payroll
tions from the non-machine point of view. The Branch Chief, himself,
after three months of experimentation realized that the functional.ized
method would not work and on 24+ September, without any knowledge of the
impending IG investigation, he abandoned the system although retaining
the computation system of tabulating. The Branch Chief feels the system
failed because of poor Agency discipline resulting in an unmanageable number
of errors in T&A's, and because of his inability to mobilize a total team
spirit within the Branch. Actually the system failed because it is so
inherently contrary to the human values concerned in payroll work. The
personnel in the Branch felt very strongly that they were being sacrificed
to the machines, and that the system was so disorganized that they could
take no pride in their work.
9. Irrespective of the reasons, it is clear that the system failed
completely and that in the process it nearly tore the Branch apart. The
inescapable fact is that a new Branch Chief was permitted to introduce a
fundamental procedural change opposed by responsible members of the Branch,
contrary to the views of the Management Staff, and apparently without the
knowledge of higher echelon supervisory personnel. The Branch Chief sin-
cerely felt that he was doing the right thing for the benefit of the Agency.
He may have felt that he was expected to make this change. The record is
unclear on this point, however it is unmistakably clear that at the Division
Chief level and higher there was a serious supervisory failure in not being
aware of the change, in not exploring it fully, and in not passing judgment
upon a decision so crucial in its impact on the morale and well being of
20 people. The error here must be ascribed primarily to supervisory levels
higher than the Branch Chief concerned.
10. With the abandonment of the functionalized system, the major cause
of the recent unrest in the Payroll Branch has been removed and in fact was
removed prior to this investigation. The Branch Chief is sincere and capable.
He has learned from this mistake and if properly supported in the manner
recommended below he should be able to bring the Branch to an acceptable
level of performance. However, in order to prevent any recurrence of this
unhappy situation and in order to insure continued improvement in the Pay-
roll Branch, the following recommendations are made.
RECOI. NDATIONS
A. It is recommended that:
1. The DDS admonish the Comptroller for the supervisory failure within
his organization resulting in the chaotic and demoralized conditions in the
Payroll Branch in recent months.
2. The DDS direct the Comptroller and the Director of Personnel to
confer and establish procedures which will insure that the Payroll Branch
is given a legitimate opportunity to recruit personnel from the Pool who,
by temperament and background, are most apt to adjust to payroll work.
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 : Cl -R 718A002000260001-2
9ONVIDENTIA
? Approved For Release 2000/04/20: CIA-RDP78-04718AO02000260001-2
3. The DDS take such measures as may be necessary to improve admin-
istrative discipline within the Agency including the tightening of
administrative procedures and the enforcement of applicable regulatory
issuances.
4+. The D S direct the Comptroller to examine the equity and Justifica-
25X1 A9a tion of Mrs. need for a parking space in the Alcott Hall
area and take action to provide such a parking space should the facts so
warrant.
rlc
Inspector General
Distribution:
Orig. & 1 - Addressee
25X1A6a
Approved For Release 2000/04/20 CIk-T DP78-04718A002000260001-2
M. r"r CONFIDENTIAL