KIDNAP RANSOM INSURANCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-04722A000200020004-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 4, 2000
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REGULATION
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-04722A000200020004-0.pdf95.19 KB
Body: 
State Dept. deqAasaffiQa s& me lame: iCISkWVWWS2tQ &H02ooo4-0 C ON IF L) MW AL ilxtAFT CA TO i All Diplomatic and Consular rests 171t04 s Department of State SWECTt Kidnap Ransom Insurance The Department has been informed that a reputable foreign inaurance firm has recently solicited some of our poets abroad, offering insurance against kidnapping and ransom, with certain limitations and conditions. Clearly, the purchase of insurance in a personal prerogative and ex- pense. However, the concept of kidnap insurance at personal expense suggests a number of problems, assns of which transcend the interests of the individual. Among these problems in the obvious question of utility. To date, moat kidnappings involving diplomats have been motivated by political considerations.-to embarrass local authorities, to gain publicity or to secure the release of so-called political prisoners. Demands for cash ransoms have been relatively rare, although it is known that terrorist groups short of operating funds do ro and kidnapping as one nource of money. Aside from being of questionable value, however, kidnap ransom insurance may actually prove to be counterproductive. General knowledge of the availability of such insurance as a potential source of easy cash CItOtfi 3 Downgraded at 12-Year Intervals; It not Automatically Declassified. CO1XDE1 TXAL Approved For Release 2001/08/29 : CIA-RDP78-04722A000200020004-0 Approved For RelewSe 2001/08/29: CIA-RDP78-04722AODM0020004-0 COt7FID T xAL 2 almost certainly would increase the vulnerability, not only of the insured but of hire family and eolloa,guca as well. Moreover, it would probably broaden the risk by introducing an incentive to the strictly criminal kidnapper or extortionist who, so far, has not been much of a threat to our personnel abroad. Other factor,, to be conaiderod include the degree to which the payment of ransom might interfere with the legal authority and ronponsibility of the host government to deal with crimes of this nature. There may well be situations in which, for any of a variety of reasons, it may be im- prudent,to bow to a kidnapper's demand. To the extent that ransom money is known to be readily available, the bargaining position of the principal negotiator is weakened. Further, the involvement of additional parties, such as the underwriter in the event ransom is paid, with the attendant complication of interests, can only add to the natural pressures and strains which must be anticipated in the iunediate post-kidnap time frame. Any discussion of this subject which may be held at addressee posts should, for obvious reasons, be very closely held. 0/Syta 3antila=ltm 0 ? Mr. Macomber C leaarancere t AID/AG/SLC M Mr, Mileski USIA/IOS ? Mr. McMictaol ~~~ .. 0/A - Mr. Donlan L/0 - Mr. Lyorly CIA CONITIDIsWTIAL Approved For Release 2001/08/29 : CIA-RDP78-04722A000200020004-0