NIS COMMITTEE MEETING NO. 133

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-05597A000400030066-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 31, 1998
• Sequence Number: 66
• Publication Date: June 10, 1952
• Content Type: MIN

Approved For Rele sw 2000/08/04: CIA-RDP78-055000400030066-8
SECURITY INFORMATION
HIS COiTtCTTI g STING NO, ],33
10 June 1952
The following were presont:
Dr. Appleton
P'Ir., Clinton
Lt, 0011. pack
Lt, Cole Louis
Mr. Shipp
Lt . Jones
Lt. Col. Rush
hk%sSion
DOCUMTHT HO. -
NO CHANCE Elsa CLASS. ^
4.rLR4Ir ai;
FLA l = -Co. TS
XT .VFW UATL:
AUTH: 3'J98
_2 _j
CIA (Vies-Chatx ,. )
State
State
IUMV
AnW
Axmr
Navy
Air Force
Air Force
S 0
Vl6W'ENs_018645
2p The V .ce.Chai.rman announced that MIS production fo ? the mouth of I 11P'
was 50 sections - Just one section under the highest previous monthly record,
He then stated t r-,at only 2 sections hr been received in D/D th:?as. far in June9
and point ,d out t3l"fat approximately 50 arore sections are needed -':o bring total
production for the year to the equl.valent of 6 complete MIS, D:scazssic --.
sealed that the . _. noses expect to achieve the 50 sections prod-action goal
in Jura,,
3, The V:p.ce Chs,i. as referred to the annul report on t:=. e NIS Progr xa
which will soon be duos and requested the members to submit c? i tents on the
various factors affecting MIS production in the: r respective ag ncies during
BY 1952. A surrrryarization of the so comments will be inelmled in the anneal
re port .
4. The Ccar ,tee member submitted their proposed rev: sloes of the
tentative FY 195:3 Production Scheeule. D/B will prepome a consolidated FY 1953
Production r`:chr-"de 1e and present it for review at the next meeting,
5? The Air Force member referred to disparities in the Chapter VIII
studies re nz tin.g s .om the fact that certain Sections 80 (Introduction) were
produced ori.or to the production of Sections 82 and 83 (Naval Forces and .Ail,
Forces, re pectivoly'). Bode Navy and Air Force contributed dt.t=.,.9' such as
strength fi. resry to them Sections 80 and those figures .saabse:quently changed.
Thus,, when the Sections 82 and 83 were produced the figures did not agree with
those shown in the Sections 80,. The suggestion was offered that the Sections 80
Approved For Release 2000/08/04: CIA-RDP78-05597A000400030066-8