EVALUATION OF JOTS IN THE OPERATIONS COURSE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-06096A000400030010-4
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 11, 2000
• Sequence Number: 10
• Publication Date: February 4, 1965
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Relea9000/08/3 P78-06096800400030010-4
4 t.brsary 1",5
#INDUK FGA: Director of Training
6UOJOC'T: Ovaiuation of JOT* in the Operations
Course
25X1A
1. Junior Officer Trainees attending the Operations Course
a are destined for assignment to the Clandestine Ser-
vices upon successful completion of that training. In assigning
these junior officers to cosponents of the C. b., information
on and evaluation of their respective performances in the Oper-
ations Course would be sort useful.
:a. Students La the Operations Course fall into these
major categories:
a. The JOT who discovers early in the course that
he has no affinity for C. .3. operattoam and decides to
withdraw. Sucb action should be encouraged whenever any
doubt uAists in the mind of the trainee concerning his
fitness for C. S. work.
b. The student wuu is di aatory and lethargic, who
is unable or unwilling to soot deadlines, who is obvio sly
disinterested or wao.e actions are prejudicial to good
order and discipline should be dealt with appropriately,
i.e. removed from tam course.
c. The remaining students should be evaluated
periodically during the Operations Course and at its
conclusion. The rating or grading of the trainees
should be related to the substance of the Operations
Course and the ability of the student to understand,
absorb and digest the material presented. It is
suggested that such training staff evaluations be
conducted at the end of six, 12 and 16 weeks. The
ala and twelve week reports should concentrate on
identification of the students whose performance 1s
below acceptable standards. The l$th week evaluation
should include all students, directed toward the
totality of the trainee"s performance in the course.
Approved For Release 2000/040%FiRE P 096A000400030010-4
 Approved For Release 2000/08/30 : CIA-RDP78-06096A000400030010-4
BEST COPY
A VAILA
Approved For Release 2000/08/30 : CIA-RDP78-06096A000400030010-4
 ILLEGIB
Approved For Release 2000/08/30 : CIA-RDP78-06096A000400030010-4
Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2000/08/30 : CIA-RDP78-06096A000400030010-4
 Approved For Releafte 2000/08/30 GP78-06098'1000400030010-4
25X1A
25X1A
25X1A
5. I am recommending that at the next meeting of the CSTB the
DTR tell the membership that OTR is willing to ume its re onsibility
for the formulation and presentation of the CI Course.
However; since OTR does not have a qualified Chief Instructor, the CS
should accept a high priority personnel requirement and make a qualified
individual available at the first opportunity. If this is done we
shall be able to start our first course as scheduled on 29 November.
cc: C/OS/TR
CH/OS/TR
Approved For e1ease' 2000/08/30 : ~ 06096A000400030010-4