LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-07181R000200050011-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 18, 2005
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 9, 1969
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-07181R000200050011-0.pdf154.48 KB
Body: 
0 0 Approved For Release J'Il.IA.RDP78.O7l81 R000200050011-0 9 April 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Language Development Program. (Language Development Program) dated 10 March 1969 was held at Arlington Towers on 7 April 69. In attendance 1. A meeting on the revised directive the office of Computer Services/sIP3. 2. The general, purpose of the meeting was to find out what ground rules, if any, the Language Development Committee has sat up to institute the Language Development Program, and also the data on which the office of Computer services/sirs was expected to support this effort. 3. The following is a synopsis of the various points covered throughout the meeting. a. 1 May 1969 is the deadline for all the Directorates of the Agency to submit their language requirements to the Language Development Committee. The Office of Training is going to sand a reminder within the weak to each of the Directorates, and a suggested format that they will follow when submitting their requirements. (NOTE: At the present time there is no sat format for inputting these requirements, and it is possible that all the Directorates will design their own format.) b. I indicated that the office of Training Language School considered the Language .Development Program as a peripheral function and their main function was to train employees in 17 various languages, not to set the language require- monts for the various Directorates. Approved For Releas4v 4 la RDP78-07181 R000200050011-0 Approved For Release 20 M-78-07181 R000200050011-0 T C. brought up the possibility of establishing a separate language record in lieu of incorporating the language requirements in the TO/Staffing system. i. Problems in the present Language Qualification Register, which in approx #35f nccurate,~iaras that employees feel reluctant to report their language qualifications for fear of being tested and results indicating that they have overrated themselves or they just don't want to be bothered with taking the test. e. The LDP Directorate 4.s reluctant to pass any information to they other Directorates. f. The Language Development Committee wants '. a nophisticated Language System by 1 Jan 1971. g. The Language School presently has a backlog of approximately 2500, employees to be tested in their language abilities. h. Definition of specific versus general language requirements, where specific indicates the language requirements are against a specific position and general indicates a stockpile of language requirements against a unit. co wort. with in meeting with the representatives o' a various directorates in setting up ground rules for the Language Development Program. J. The Language school felt that the language requirements would only have to be updated annually, and they did not have to be kept current with the T/a.: k* felt that there would be approximately 700 to 1,000 language requirements in the Language Development Program. ii[~ C~41i I -11~ 1. offered the services of Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP78-07181 R000200050011-0 25X1 25X1 Approved For Relea=QvEtw-RDP78-07181 R000200050011-0 4. In summary, the general fooling was that no specific ground rules for the Language Development Program have boon established and we would wait until I May 1969 to find out what the various directorates submit in the form of language requirements. 25X a Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP78-07181 R000200050011-0