MISSION 1030 PHOTOGRAPHIC EVALUATION INTERIM REPORT (PEIR)

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040128-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 25, 2008
Sequence Number: 
128
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 2, 1966
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040128-4.pdf224.85 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 TOP, SECRET T 0 P S E C R E T 020010Z '2 2 0 9 Z SUBJ: MISSION 1030 PHOTOGRAPHIC EVALUATION INTERIM REPORT (PEIR) 1. NUMERICAL SUMMARY MSN NO AND DATES: 1030-1, 9-14 MARCH 1966 1030-2, 14-19 MARCH 1966 LAUNCH DATE AND TIME: 9 MARCH 1966/2202Z VEHICLE NUMBER: 1622 CAMERA SYSTEM: J-29 PAN CAMERA NOS: FWD LOOKING (MASTER) 182 AFT LOOKING (SLAVE) 183 S/I CAMERA NOS: MSN 1030-1: D94/100/107 MSN 1030-2: D82/195/102 RECOVERY REVS: D81 AND D159 2. CAMERA SETTINGS FWD LOOKING 0.275 INCH SLIT, WRATTEN 25 FILTER AFT LOOKING 0.175 INCH SLIT, WRATTEN 21 FILTER 3. PERFORMANCE SUMMARY A SMALL PORTION OF THE PAN PHOTOGRAPHY FROM THIS MISSION IS Top SECRET Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 4 APR 12F5 v #rrnmatull , 25X1 Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 . 0 CONSIDERED TO BE AS GOOD AS ANY OBSERVED IN RECENT MISSIONS. HOW- EVER, MOST OF THE MATERIAL WAS OF DISTINCTLY POORER QUALITY THAN ANY RECENT CORONA MISSION. THE REDUCTION IN OVERALL QUALITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO SEVERE ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS AND HIGH ORIGINAL NEGATIVE DENSITY. THESE CONDITIONS ARE DISCUSSED FURTHER IN PARA 5, COMMENTS. ONLY ONE RESOLUTION TARGET DISPLAY WAS IMAGED. THIS HIGH CONTRAST TARGET, COVERED UNDER POOR WEATHER CONDITIONS, INDICATED ALONG TRACK (IMC) AND CROSS TRACK (SCAN) RESOLUTION VALUES OF ABOUT FOR BOTH CAMERAS. THE QUALITY OF MATERIAL FROM THE TWO PAN CAMERAS APPEARED ON THE AVERAGE TO BE COMPARABLE. 4. ANOMALIES ANOMALIES INCLUDING THOSE REPORTED IN THE REBIND 42 MESSAGES REF A, B, AND C) WERE REVIEWED. A. POOR IMAGERY FROM STARBOARD HORIZON CAMERAS CAUSE: THE STARBOARD H. 0.'S PRODUCED POOR BUT USABLE IMAGERY VERY EARLY IN THE MISSION. AS THE FLIGHT PROGRESSED THE STARBOARD H.O.'S CONTINUED TO DEGRADE TO A USELESS CONDITION. THEY BEGAN TO CLEAR ON PASS D98, AND AFTER D132 APPEARANCE WAS NORMAL. IT IS NOTED THAT ON MISSIONS WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS NOT YAWED AROUND, NO DEGRADING EFFECTS WERE OBSERVED ON THE H.O.'S OR STELLAR CAMERA MATERIAL. ACTION: NONE INDICATED ON THE BASIS OF PRESENT DATA. B. MISSING END-OF-PASS MARK ON MASTER INSTRUMENT. CAUSE: REVIEW OF THE PRE-FLIGHT MATERIAL INDICATED THAT Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 0 0 THE EOP MARK WAS PRESENT PRIOR TO LIFT OFF. THE MARKER LAMP WAS LOST DURING ASSENT, PROBABLY DUE TO VIBRATION SINCE IT WAS NOT PRESENT ON ANY FLIGHT PHOTOGRAPHY. ACTION: NONE INDICATED. C. AN EMULSION SCRATCH REPEATING AT 6 1/4 INCH INTERVALS WAS EVIDENT THROUGHOUT THE INDEX RECORD OF 1030-1. THE SCRATCH WAS LOCATED 5/8" FROM THE CAMERA NUMBER EDGE. CAUSE: THIS IS A PROCESSOR DEFECT AND THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM HAS BEEN CORRECTED. ACTION: NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED. D. RAKE LINES IN THE LATTER PART OF 1030-1 AFT CAMERA MATERIAL. CAUSE: THIS DEFECT COULD ORIGINATE IN MANUFACTURE, OPERATION, OR PROCESSING. ACTION: UNDER INVESTIGATION. E. CHARACTERISTIC ANOMALIES THERE ARE CERTAIN CHARACTERISTIC ANOMALIES THAT ARE CON- SIDERED INHERENT TO THE OPERATION OF THE CORONA SYSTEM. WHILE THESE ITEMS WARRANT ATTENTION TO PREVENT FURTHER DEGRADATION, IT IS NOT FELT THAT SPECIFIC ACTION ITEMS SHOULD BE ASSIGNED. A SUMMARY OF THESE ITEMS AND THE DEGREE OF DEGRADATION IS PRESENTED BELOW. (1) SCRATCHES IN THE FORMATS OF BOTH PAN CAMERAS WERE NORMAL. (2) RAIL SCRATCHES FROM BOTH PAN CAMERAS WERE NORMAL. (3) RAGGED FORMAT EDGES FROM SCRAPED EMULSION WERE Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040128-4 9 GREATER THAN NORMAL. (4) STATIC DISCHARGE ALONG THE EDGES OF BOTH PAN CAMERA FILMS WAS LESS THAN NORMAL. (5) LIGHT LEAKS AFFECTING BOTH PAN CAMERA FILMS WERE LESS THAN USUAL. (6) PLUS DENSITY ELECTROSTATIC STREAKS ON BOTH STELLAR FILMS WERE NORMAL. (7) MULTI-DIRECTIONAL, PLUS DENSITY STREAKS APPEARED INTERMITTENTLY THROUGH FRAME 78 OF THE 1030-1 STELLAR MATERIAL. THIS CONDITION IS NORMAL. 5. COMMENTS A. BOTH THE PET AND THE PI'S FEEL THAT THIS MISSION WAS BADLY AFFECTED BY ATMOSPHERICS. IN MANY TARGET AREAS THERE WAS A SEVERE HAZE LAYER THAT DRASTICALLY REDUCED CONTRAST AND IMAGE QUALITY. AN ANALYSIS OF THE INDEX MATERIAL BEARS THIS OUT. IN THIS ANALYSIS THE NUMBER OF CLEAR FRAMES WERE NOTED. THOSE WITH A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF CLOUDS OR OBVIOUS HAZE WERE NOT FURTHER ANAL- YZED. THOSE THAT WERE CLEAR WERE BROKEN DOWN INTO SNOW AND ICE, AND TERRAIN CATEGORIES. THE DATA PRESENTED BELOW CLEARLY ILLUS- TRATES THE LOW PERCENTAGE OF CLEAR INDEX FRAMES OBSERVED, AND THE EVEN LOWER PERCENTAGE OF CLEAR TERRAIN FRAMES OBSERVED. 1030-1 (TOTAL INDEX FRAMES - 422) TOTAL CLEAR FRAMES (10 PERCENT OR LESS CLOUD COVER) 65 OR 15 PERCENT CLEAR (WITH SNOW AND ICE) 58 OR 13 PERCENT Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040128-4 Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 Wn. CLEAR TERRAIN 1030-2 (TOTAL INDEX FRAMES - 444) TOTAL CLEAR FRAMES (10 PERCENT OR LESS CLOUD COVER) CLEAR WITH SNOW AND ICE 7 OR 2 PERCENT 75 OR 17 PERCENT 23 OR 6 PERCENT CLEAR TERRAIN 52 OR 11 PERCENT FROM THIS ANALYSIS IT IS OBVIOUS THAT A VERY SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE TARGETS WERE IN CLEAR AREAS. B. ON MISSION 1030, THE MEASURED D-MIN VALUES WERE HIGHER THAN ON PREVIOUS CORONA MISSIONS, EVEN WITH A LOWER PERCENTAGE OF FULL PROCESSING. THE TEAM IS CONCERNED, BUT UNCERTAIN, AS TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS FACT. IT IS NOT EASY TO DEFINE WHAT IS AN OPTIMUM EXPOSURE, BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF CORRELATION BETWEEN MEASURED DENSITY VALUES AND MISSION PERFORMANCE. THE CORRELATION BETWEEN MEASURED DENSITY VALUES AND MISSION PERFORMANCE IS NOT A STRAIGHT FORWARD MATTER. VARIABLES SUCH AS ATMOSPHERICS, SLIT WIDTH, SOLAR ALTITUDE, LAUNCH TIME, ETC., CAN AFFECT BOTH DENSITY AND PERFORMANCE IN DIFFERENT WAYS. THE PET FEELS THAT UNTIL FURTHER RESEARCH REVEALS MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATING TO OPTIMUM EXPOSURE LEVELS, THIS QUESTION WILL REMAIN ESSENTIALLY UNANSWER- ABLE . C. BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF CORRELATION BETWEEN MTF RESOLUTION 11 DATA AND MISSION PERFORMANCE, THE TEAM RECOMMENDS THAT UNDER- 2 5X1 TAKE A STUDY TO EVALUATE THE CORRELATION BETWEEN MTF RESOLUTION VALUES AND THE FACTORS RELATING TO THESE MEASUREMENTS. Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78BO4558AO01200040128-4 Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040128-4 D. THE PET RECOMMENDS THAT PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSIDER THE USE OF A WRATTEN 23 FILTER IN PLACE OF THE WRATTEN 25 ON THE FWD LOOKING CAMERA. SUFFICENT QUANTITY OF FILTER MATERIAL AND FILTER FACTOR INFORMATION HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED TO AP. T 0 P S E C R E T Approved For Release 2008/06/25: CIA-RDP78B04558A001200040128-4