EVALUATION OF (Sanitized)'DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT, SPAN ENLARGER-PRINTER-PROCESSOR, MODEL EPP 9-500'

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04747A002100060006-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 19, 2001
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 20, 1964
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04747A002100060006-7.pdf352.26 KB
Body: 
D RAF T Approved Fo*lease 2001/08/13: CIA-RDP78B0474 02100060006-7 STATINTL SUBJECT: Evaluation of "Description of Equipment, SPAN Enlarger-Printer-Processor, Model EPP 9-500". 1. This mechanical photo-optical device as per proposal is to use the - Bimat process to obtain the finished exploitable transparency regardless of degree of magnification. The evaluation will cover the system in two modes, (1) the photosensitive material and (2) the optomechanica.l system. 2. The Bimat process was proposed;therefore the evaluation will focus upon it as the photosensitive media although comments will be presented on other potential products later in this ft?xxm x dissertation. a.. Photosensitive material - ^ Bimat process (1) Materials - ate no reproduction type of materials SO-105, and SO-278 (8430) have been "bimatted", that is the mono- bath chemistry does not exist. Experimentation has been almost STATINTL completed for M Special High Definition Aerial Film, Type SO 243 (equivalent SO 132, 4404). This is O taking film and is not processed to a gamma, of 1.0 but to higher gammas; therefore/there is no chemistry available to perform experiments which would give qxi qualitative values were the film used for reproduction purposes. (2) Processing Time - The thinner emulsions process to completion more rapidly than the thicker characterized by the faster Aerial STATINTL taking films. of E Research Labs postulated that SO 243 could be rrocessed in 60 seconds and possibly the reproduction type film in 3C to 60 seconds. (3) Subsequent treatment - the negative and positive can be used almost immediately since they are "virtually" dry when separated after processing. If they are to be stored for any length of time or retained for archives there is a requirement for subsequent washing only for a short time. This would also require drying DECLASS REXIEW b4 N A/DOD pprove or a ease 1/08/13: CIA-RDP78BO4747AO02100060006-7 Approved Fcelease 2001/08/13: CIA-RDP78B0474&002100060006-7 consequently the necessity for more time. (4) Quality - The negative, Res. Lab., assures me is very high quality. But the xmgatt x positive formed by the sion process cannot certain much more than a. transfer of 70% of the information in the negative. (5) Roll vs cut film - The SPAN E-P-P is designed to use roll film. It seems reasonable to believe that it could be designed to STATINTL use cut film and the -people feel that it a is feasible to do Bima.t with cut film. b. Opto-mechanical system (1) The enlargement constants appear to be satisfactory. The full c2" film width will be utilized regardless of film being viewed. (2) A question arises as to adequacy of exposing light for slow photo sensitive reproduction type materials with varying magni- fications; will the 940 type light tables furnish enough exposing light? It can be expected that a ='ka there will also be ' a significant reduction in the contrast due to the diffuse light sourcex of the table itself. (3) The xzxt?mgmx continuous roll processing is not at all acceptable. Out film is mandatory. Too much waste would incur with the continuous roll film approach. (4) Regarding usage of the finished print, if .?z it is to be a working copy and there is volume xH _ Irorsr ~rsaxxxxsffra requirement for enough near real time (quickie) reproductions then this device can be of significant service. Conceptually it ?? looks good but will requi:-e considerable change in some of its elements i.e., cut 2 film handling so that individual copies can be called for, adequate Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78BO4747AO02100060006-7 light source, etc. A" seem ? a, sis after the design pha.se should be performed in an attempt to determine the efficiency of the device prior to hardware fabrication. This is in essence another "chip" printer only the chip is larger and has no data, block. 4. There are other potential photosensitive materials that are being developed, some in late stages of development, that show greater promise than the Bimat process g both from quality of output and ease of handling. They are dry processed and have a, near real time print production possibility. The Air Force has a high degree of confidence that Diazo materials (800 l/mm and 21 step grey scale) (vapor processed STATINTL in seconds) will be the reproduction standard x or them. Other processes known in house, ~~~r+, shows/ romise. At this time there are no specifics of resolution or grey scale rendition known on the }[t' in terms I . PV-Q~. It is heat processed. STATINTL the devices Q,Qi c, ~ '?~ ~Z~zL. scg r a.. Requirement for a quick print b. Real Time capability for producing the print c. d. e. f Degree of magnification required Quality of the reproduction material Quality and quantity of image producing light Weighing develo d i ment time of MM STATINTL . p ev ce " Ile d 0a, -., //Vp /I Approved F*lease 2001/08/13: CIA-RDP78BO470002100060006-7 with Bimat process against a.va.ilabilityA - dryP' 'cessed photosensitive material consequently requiring a, subsequent later development. Approved For Release 2001108P13 CIA-RDP78B04747A002100060006-7 dry`" a rove sMp-r. n of Project Type of Contract 2-0 Date Proposal Recd. /,'Clci-4'A/ la,a:iam ion I corms G /2 YL' t GL 7 (~~ 7 C r 't" sa~L c ry C ~_ v` P' s v u v -^ I- ~"/~,! 7 CATE PApproved Fo eaIZQQ;V N8A-RDP788047 02100060006-7___._ STATINTL - .:y Lundahi 19 March 64 by ATE PPROVED By DA "ONED eV NEIL- 1 20 March 1964 by TATINTI L DUE Di1T - .. J UATIE I /"~ I I I L COMPL % COMPL Oescrir: ` on o;' Equipment STATINTL Sarger-I': inter-Processor Model EPP9-500. ?you v .:;-ation with STATINTL 3. 're 'are your imm- iiate and thorough evaluation) to ?;c ',..( Mr. Lundahl. STATINTL 2` T STAFF STUDY COMPLETED SENT TO TDC TDC ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION ICOMPLETION DATE 42aJ100060006- Ig ? Minor Approved Fo.lease 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78B04210f0060007 /~ V i/V ! , 1 j -fry _-V -t-., t, i a s Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78BO4747AO02100060006-7 ed For Release 2001/08/13 '^ P78B04747A00210006000.6-7__