CONTRACT INSPECTION REPORT PHASE I DESIGN STUDY AND DEMONSTRATION/AUTOMATIC MULTIPLE IMAGE INTEGRATION STUDY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78B04770A000200010031-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 1, 2004
• Sequence Number: 31
• Publication Date: February 23, 1967
• Content Type: FORM

^ SECRET ? CONFIDENTIAL 992
Approved F elease 2004/07/29 : CIA
CONTRACT INTION REPORT
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION & SETTLEMENT
BRANCH/PD/OL
^ NO
TYPE OF COMMODITY OR SERVICE
Pha,ae I Design Study and .tmonstrs tion/Automatic Mu1tip1 l ~- integration
Study
IS THIS AN INCENTIVE CONTRACT K YES ONO
IF YES. CHECK TYPE
O COST 0 AWARD ? PERFORMANCE 0 DELIVERY
A
^ UNCLASSIFIED
R0Pt7 - s0002001rQA11e6
? sbrua:y 1967
INSPECTION REPORT NO. (If final, so state
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROBABLY REMAIN WITHIN ALLOCATED
FUNDS EYES ^ NO IF ANSWER IS "NO" ADVISE REC-
OMMENDATION AND/OR ACTION OF SPONSORING OFFICE. ON
REVERSE HEREOF. IF KNOWN. INDICATE MAGNITUDE OF AD-
DITIONAL FUNDS INVOLVED.
HAS AN INTERIM REPORT. FINAL REPORT, PROTOTYPE. OR OTHER END ITEM BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE CONTRACTOR
DURING THE PERIOD? J2 YES ^ NO (If yes, give details on reverse side.)
HAS GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY BEEN DELIVERED TO CONTRACTOR DURING THIS PERIOD? ^ YES YYI NO
(If yes, indicate items, quantity, and cost on reverse side.) 4W
^ OUTSTANDING
2. ^ EXCELLENT
^ VERY GOOD
IF OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF
REASONS ON REVERSE SIDE.
xi
? CONTINUE AS PROGRAMMED ^
I completed, Tasr
WITHHOLD PAYMENT PENDING
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
^ TERMINATE ^ OTHER
IF TERMINATION IS RECOMMENDED OR IF THIS IS A FINAL REPORT PUT COMMENTS ON REVERSE IN NARRATIVE
FORM ON CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND CERTIFY THAT ALL DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN
RECEIVED. THESE INCLUDE, WHERE APPLICABLE. THE FOLLOWING:
PRODUCTION AND/OR OTHER
END ITEMS
DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH CONTRACTOR
21 February 1967
NOTE:
USE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMMENTS.
FINAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INCENTIVE EVALUATION.
4. ^ ABOVE AVERAGE 7. a UNSATISFACTORY
5. AVERAGE
6. ^ MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE
CONTRACTOR IS UNSATISFACTORY OR MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE INDICATE
DOES NOT
APPLY
e-66 1897 E ONsved ~a1- 5s~g WW607/29 : CIA ffed# 7 40020001On-?EGRET
Declass Review by NGA.
DOES NOT
APPLY
 ^ SECRET ? CONFIDENTIAL UNCLASSIFIED
NARRATIVE REPORT INTERIM 0 FINAL
On 20 January 196/ 9 Mecera I Ibriefad A5
They presented a simmory of their work on Phase I and recommendations
for Phase 2. They also M:bmfttad a t *t dateed. 1 Jasuzary 196''. Indica-
tions are that there is little to be pained from fabricating am automatic
multiple image integration printer under Phase P. The duality of the fib
used at TTMC is such that multiple integration of negatives would not
appreciably improve the product.
su.ubmitted a proposed change in scope for the work it Phase 2.
The change they suggested was rejected because of similar work. peiiY-
accomplished with another company under another contras..
has submitted a proposal. br a change in: scope for Phase 2 that
would do further correlation work which could be used in the Stereo Scanning
Program and the stereo cos rator program. This proposal is hein , evaluated.
kk m- - - 9AA119AWPQ -
D.UNCLASS IED CONFIDENTIAL ^ SECRET